Your Oxfordshire
Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting 'OXFORD NEWS' to 80360 or email »
Dominatrix: Pervert had taste for nettles
11:39am Saturday 17th May 2008
By Funny Mummy »
A dominatrix has told how shamed driving instructor David Aston talked of his taste for underage girls as she whipped his private parts with stinging nettles.
Dominatrix Annie Jones, 51, said she first met Aston around 10 years ago when he employed her sexual domination services.
She said: "I could tell he was strange from the start.
"He was only about 21, but he wanted me to wrap stinging nettles around his groin and also to punch and kick him.
"He used to talk about liking very young girls, but I didn't think he was doing actually doing anything with them.
"I will tell police if I think someone is doing is something illegal.
"Now I know what he was doing, I wish I'd done more."
Mrs Jones said she last spoke to Aston around six months ago.
She said: "He was going to come and see me again, but then I didn't hear from him - I thought he must have been getting his pleasures elsewhere.
"I was really shocked to hear what he had been doing with young girls, but in some ways it doesn't surprise me because he was so strange.
"He should go to jail for a long time."
Your Say YourOxford
alan page, says...
2:00pm Sat 17 May 08
On the one hand society is w----g itself silly over such fantasies and on the other banging people up for making these fantasies real.
Its rather perverse and twisted.
no name, says...
2:17pm Sat 17 May 08
member of the public, says...
2:41pm Sat 17 May 08
the parents should be ashamed that their children behave in this way as they are as much to blame. they arent victims they wanted to go through with this and they must pay their concequences .
alan page, says...
2:47pm Sat 17 May 08
no name wrote:I totally agree, but look at the kind of lifestyles celebrities are busy promoting via the media.
yes people may have strange fetishes like that there are many worse one than that. he is allowed to explore what turns him on but i think the whole context with being interested in young girls is a bit over the top. girls as young as 12 are dressing themselves up trying to appeal to an older age group. people need to look at other sides as well girls will try and be slags alot of them will go out drinking and smoking and will have sex will anyone. they should be better educated and their parents should bring them up to know that selling your self like that is digusting the parents should be ashamed that their children are acting in this way.
If kids don't have role models then they are going to imitate their direct surroundings.
But who is society throwing up? Promiscuous junkies who flaunt the law as they see fit and do nothing except get shitfaced and earn megabucks.
Is it really any wonder some kids behave like **** if that is what the adults around them are behaving like?
Some arsehole on here was against banging up some drug addicted wretch who was selling Class a drugs because they had kids of 18 months and 9 years old. If that kind of behaviour is tolerated, then people have no right to complain if kids imitate their elders.
anonymous, Oxford says...
2:51pm Sat 17 May 08
Mr Ison, England says...
3:09pm Sat 17 May 08
I can only assume Justice Hall does not consider the defendant to be a Paedophile,at least not one cast from his own mould.
Julie, says...
3:36pm Sat 17 May 08
Anon, Witney says...
3:52pm Sat 17 May 08
If this case teaches us anything, it's that the Internet is a very dangerous place if not used correctly and safely.
I would urge all parents of children under 16 to block these 'chat room' sites and have strict parental controls in their Internet settings so that this sort of thing will never happen again!
the parent, says...
4:03pm Sat 17 May 08
did, and will do again given the opportunity, is disgusting, the girls played a part in this i don't disagree, but they put there hands up to that and faced the consequences of their actions..that pervert couldn't even do that, he lied from day one about what he did, to get himself off the hook..he derserves everything coming his way.you can blame the girls, the parents, the media..whoever..but it comes back to the point, he preys on young girls, he knew they were underage and he didn't walk away, he went back for more knowing that..
oxford, says...
4:22pm Sat 17 May 08
there where more than 1 girl with him at the time they could of easily legged it if they wanted but they chose to meet a 2nd time! this shows that they wanted to do it . i agree it was wrong but you dont know what was going through his head at the time he could of been going through a tough time and did a stupid thing that he has been paying for for the last 2 years. he has a family to support and they must be hurt too. i think he has suffered enough and that a prision sentence is unfair i hope you can see this if he was dangerous why would the police let him off why didnt they put him in prison straight away? why was he still able to teach ? he isnt dangerous people make stupid mistakes in their life and i feel that he should be given a 2nd chance threats and anger is a childish way to handle the situation it make you seem as bad as the case. but i think you should understand that your child decided to do this she had the time to say no when she was chatting to him by the net and before they met or after the first time they met. you need to seriously think about this . your child is to blame as well she isnt stupid. i think the judge should of given something to the girls as well they were drinking and smoking which is illegal. you must of known your child was doing this .
DanOxford, says...
4:47pm Sat 17 May 08
Some arsehole on here was against banging up some drug addicted wretch who was selling Class a drugs because they had kids of 18 months and 9 years old. If that kind of behaviour is tolerated, then people have no right to complain if kids imitate their elders.
Some ar*hole on here frequently compares grown adults CHOOSING to take recreational drugs to adults abusing vulnerable children.
The same ars*ole on here frequentlky states that taking 'professionally posed' (as opposed to seedy amateur????) photos of children is harmless, and waffles on about renaissance art to justify it.
Unbelievably, the same ar*hole thinks that a mother who has been caught dealing drugs, has been tried according to the law of the land, placed under strict supervison and told that she will be jailed INSTANTLY if she reoffends shoud be locked up in one of our over-crowed prisons and her children separated from theior mother and their siblings and placed into local authority care.
Fortunately, this ar*hole doesn't live in Oxford and doesn't know what the f*ck he's on about , eh Alan?
parent of one of the girls, says...
4:48pm Sat 17 May 08
Urticaria, says...
4:49pm Sat 17 May 08
DanOxford, says...
4:50pm Sat 17 May 08
Mr Mears, Shephards Bush says...
5:10pm Sat 17 May 08
Naturist Justice, Phone Booth says...
5:19pm Sat 17 May 08
Justice Hall should have his private parts thrashed with Stingers by young girls.
It's the latest craze among the Country Lifers.
L, Oxford says...
5:24pm Sat 17 May 08
Major Bumsore, in the bushes says...
5:31pm Sat 17 May 08
peter, oxford says...
5:39pm Sat 17 May 08
Donna Anne Salad, ouch that would hurt says...
5:42pm Sat 17 May 08
B-S-M, Learner says...
5:44pm Sat 17 May 08
Mike, East Oxford says...
7:05pm Sat 17 May 08
Major Bumsore wrote:Sort him out?
Bring back corporal punishment.. that'll sort him out
He will think he has died and gone to paedo heaven!
Hopefully not a rash decision.
fashion critic, paris catwalks says...
8:21pm Sat 17 May 08
L wrote:nice socks!
Is it just me finding this highly amusing? If it wasn't for the underage girls that is. The picture where the dude is running is priceless
Ho! Ho!, Laughing my head orf! says...
8:23pm Sat 17 May 08
Urticaria wrote:Cracking! Deserves a wider audience, that one.
Stinging nettles? It must have been a great relief to him to end up in the dock
paul, oxford says...
8:25pm Sat 17 May 08
alan page, says...
12:47am Sun 18 May 08
DanOxford wrote:Well Dannyboy your the one who believes that drug addicted dealers make perfect role models arent you? And that having crack and all that other crap around the place will have no impact on a child's view of the world.
Alan Page got worked up again: Some arsehole on here was against banging up some drug addicted wretch who was selling Class a drugs because they had kids of 18 months and 9 years old. If that kind of behaviour is tolerated, then people have no right to complain if kids imitate their elders. Some ar*hole on here frequently compares grown adults CHOOSING to take recreational drugs to adults abusing vulnerable children. The same ars*ole on here frequentlky states that taking \'professionally posed\' (as opposed to seedy amateur????) photos of children is harmless, and waffles on about renaissance art to justify it. Unbelievably, the same ar*hole thinks that a mother who has been caught dealing drugs, has been tried according to the law of the land, placed under strict supervison and told that she will be jailed INSTANTLY if she reoffends shoud be locked up in one of our over-crowed prisons and her children separated from theior mother and their siblings and placed into local authority care. Fortunately, this ar*hole doesn\'t live in Oxford and doesn\'t know what the f*ck he\'s on about , eh Alan?
So again,Dan, what social harm is created by somebody downloaded professionally posed pictures of naked children? None whatsoever. They might just as well be downloading Carravaggio paintings for all the harm it causes.
What do drug dealers and paedophiles have in common? They are both predatory scum and both have a body of pseudoscientific evidence used to claim their influence as harmless.
Both parties blame prohibition for the evils, both blame media hysteria instead of taking responsibility for their actions.
Your the one who condones drug dealing, your the one saying that police resources could be better spent elsewhere than rounding up criminals.
Even here, instead of addressing the point I made about celebrities presenting appalling role models by resembling walking Medicine cabinets you would rather take cheap shots at me than face up to the stupidity and vacuity of your position or the question of adult responsibilty to kids in general.
alan page, says...
12:54am Sun 18 May 08
DanOxford wrote:Don't have to as he has come out of his immature druggy haze and is now back as the funny guy he used to be before he started listening to degenerate scum like you.
And Alan- this story wasn't about drugs- FFS go to counselling with your 'druggie/ junkie' family member and work through your 'issues' so you can stop hijacking every story on here with your personal drug- related problems
Maturity will reach you one day.May it give you a good kick up the arse!!
DanOxford, says...
11:23am Sun 18 May 08
DanOxford wrote:To put the record straight:
Alan Page got worked up again: Some arsehole on here was against banging up some drug addicted wretch who was selling Class a drugs because they had kids of 18 months and 9 years old. If that kind of behaviour is tolerated, then people have no right to complain if kids imitate their elders. Some ar*hole on here frequently compares grown adults CHOOSING to take recreational drugs to adults abusing vulnerable children. The same ars*ole on here frequentlky states that taking 'professionally posed' (as opposed to seedy amateur????) photos of children is harmless, and waffles on about renaissance art to justify it. Unbelievably, the same ar*hole thinks that a mother who has been caught dealing drugs, has been tried according to the law of the land, placed under strict supervison and told that she will be jailed INSTANTLY if she reoffends shoud be locked up in one of our over-crowed prisons and her children separated from theior mother and their siblings and placed into local authority care. Fortunately, this ar*hole doesn't live in Oxford and doesn't know what the f*ck he's on about , eh Alan?
"Well, I suppose putting her kids into care at (our) vast expense wouldn't have helped anybody and I imagine she'll be effectively finished as a drug dealer now and the 150 hours unpaid work may go some small way towards the woman making a positive contribution to the society that (presumably) has paid for her to have three children and sell her neighbours drugs."
I opposed her being seperated from her kids because it would cost me money to do so.In terms of my best interests it is better for kids to grow up being nurtered by drug dealing smackheads than placed in the care of people who may act as suitable role models whilst the mother got herself clean and found proper work to do.
It is more cost effective for children to be neglected by smackheads (sorry "recreational drug" users)than for them to have a fair and adequate upbringing.
Of course my support for drug consumption is part of the problem here. But, as Kinsey observed in regards to kiddyfiddling, this woman is one of a tiny minority of individuals who have fallen foul of drugs.
As in the Kinsey findings,for the vast majority, it is simply harmless fun.
oxford, says...
5:32pm Sun 18 May 08
she is only repeat what has been sed in the papers this article is aload of crap . people love to sell stories for money.
a former pupil of mr aston, oxford says...
6:27pm Sun 18 May 08
Osama Bin Laden, Tel Aviv says...
7:28pm Sun 18 May 08
lisa, oxford says...
9:15pm Sun 18 May 08
Mr Ison, England says...
10:16pm Sun 18 May 08
Seems to me a new law could solve the problem.
I surpose the law could also ban young boys from whipping older womens paps with the same.
One Of The Girls., Oxfordshire says...
10:57pm Sun 18 May 08
Mr Ison, England says...
11:32pm Sun 18 May 08
Maybe they could liase with BBC scriptwriters as they do now.
Rachel Bennett, Wallingford says...
12:48am Mon 19 May 08
L wrote:You would run like that with a bunch of nettles wrapped around your tackle!!
Is it just me finding this highly amusing? If it wasn't for the underage girls that is. The picture where the dude is running is priceless
Swampsnake, Oxford says...
11:34am Mon 19 May 08
former pupil, says...
7:55pm Mon 19 May 08
mr aston is a nice and caring man he would never do this on purpose its a mistake that he has made everyone makes mistakes but in different ways and as the girl sed they have all played a part in this so both sides are guilty but this case is out of hand especially by the press they love anything like this and blow it all out of perspective.
my feelings are with mr aston and his family.
former pupil, says...
9:24pm Mon 19 May 08
The girls knew what they were getting into if not the first time but certanly the second time. If they didnt want to carry on when they first met him then why didnt they just kick and run. The young girls these days want to be all grown up but when it comes down to it they are just little girls, so watch out boys you could be the next victim.
bob, Oxford says...
10:42am Tue 20 May 08
alan page wrote:Evidently Mr Page has done his internet research very thoroughly indeed.
And yet the internet is full of legal **** sites feeding incest fantasies and old men having it away with girls who look decidedly underage but aren't (files on record), school uniform fetishes etc. On the one hand society is w----g itself silly over such fantasies and on the other banging people up for making these fantasies real. Its rather perverse and twisted.
Anon, Oxfordshire says...
11:00am Tue 20 May 08
Stinging nettles? It must have been a great relief to him to end up in the dock
Genius
a pupil of mr aston, oxford says...
12:00pm Tue 20 May 08
Anony, Oxford says...
2:53pm Tue 20 May 08
Your sayYourOxford
Add your comment
Register for a FREE thisisoxfordshire account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
Asron tries to flee the photographers at Oxford Crown Court
But appears more relaxed later
Dave, Oxford says...
12:19pm Sat 17 May 08