'Gateway traffic fears need to be looked at'

Bob Price

Bob Price

First published in News

traffic fears must be addressed before a major commercial development on Oxford’s northern fringe moves forward, according to the landowner and business leaders.

The Northern Gateway scheme near the A34 Pear Tree interchange includes plans for 200 homes alongside business space to create up to 3,000 jobs.

But Oxford City Council and Oxfordshire County Council are at odds over the traffic impact the development would have.

And the major landowner, St John’s College, said this week it wanted “consensus” between the authorities before moving forward.

Yesterday Nigel Wild, president of Oxfordshire Chamber of Commerce , endorsed that stance.

He said: “The Northern Gateway could be good for development and jobs.

“With the Pear Tree and Wolvercote roundabouts in such close proximity, it’s a very sensitive traffic area and I think St John’s is right – the councils need to have a joined-up approach.”

Fellow retail spokesman Graham Jones, also vice-chairman of the Wolvercote Neighbourhood Plan working group, added: “There are major conflicts with traffic at the Wolvercote roundabout and that needs to be resolved before you create a new development.”

The college’s agreement with a development partner has now expired and it said it would not be appointing a replacement to help it design and build the scheme, until the city and county councils could agree on key issues.

Principal bursar Prof Andrew Parker said the college wanted to move forward once there was “widespread local support”.

He said: “St John’s is keen to seek a consensus with the local authorities and is content to wait until the city and county councils are ready to express a view.

“We won’t stand in the way of any well-conceived plans for the area. If we get a clear steer from the community and local authorities that it is what they want to do we are ready to help.”

City council bosses have said the land is critical to Oxford’s economy as it is the only major site suitable for employment left within the city boundaries.

It is part of Oxford’s core strategy, the city’s blueprint for development until 2026, which was approved in Dec-ember 2010.

But the county is unsure about the implications on two of the city’s busiest junctions.

County council leader Ian Hudspeth said: “The main issue is the traffic.

“At the Pear Tree and Wolvercote roundabouts there is an awful lot of congestion and that is the main issue which needs to be addressed.”

The city council are still hopeful work could start before the end of the decade.

City council leader Bob Price said: “From the county council’s point of view, the Wolvercote Roundabout and Pear Tree Roundabout are important junctions so I am sure they will be the matter of debate.

“Until there is a scheme on the ground it will be difficult to be clear about what the effects will be.”

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:53pm Fri 28 Sep 12

Andrew:Oxford says...

How much money could be saved if there were a Unitary Authority for Oxfordshire?

What level of traffic could be mitigated if Witney, Carterton & Yarnton were re-connected to the rail network?

Likewise, how much traffic will switch to rail when E-W opens? New homes in the area will have a railway station on their doorstep.
How much money could be saved if there were a Unitary Authority for Oxfordshire? What level of traffic could be mitigated if Witney, Carterton & Yarnton were re-connected to the rail network? Likewise, how much traffic will switch to rail when E-W opens? New homes in the area will have a railway station on their doorstep. Andrew:Oxford
  • Score: 2

4:58pm Fri 28 Sep 12

West Oxon Webwatcher says...

A unitary authority would without doubt avoid this situation. Whether any money would be saved would depend upon the attitude of such a new authority as to saving money. In the past each reorganisation has resulted in new larger authorities ending up by spending more money. E-W rail would take some traffic off the roads but would not solve the A34 and A40 traffic problems. The main problem is that Oxford City has too many jobs for the people who can live in the city so so many have to live outside and commute into Oxford for work. 3000 jobs but only 200 homes would mean that congestion on the A40 in the morning in the east bound direction would stretch back to Burford instead of to Witney as is sometimes the case now. The only solution would be a dual carriage A40 by-pass of North Oxford as proposed in the 1980s but that seems impossible now due to both fiancial and environmental objections by the green front. A34 needs to be improved to motorway standard as it now takes motorway volumes of traffic.
A unitary authority would without doubt avoid this situation. Whether any money would be saved would depend upon the attitude of such a new authority as to saving money. In the past each reorganisation has resulted in new larger authorities ending up by spending more money. E-W rail would take some traffic off the roads but would not solve the A34 and A40 traffic problems. The main problem is that Oxford City has too many jobs for the people who can live in the city so so many have to live outside and commute into Oxford for work. 3000 jobs but only 200 homes would mean that congestion on the A40 in the morning in the east bound direction would stretch back to Burford instead of to Witney as is sometimes the case now. The only solution would be a dual carriage A40 by-pass of North Oxford as proposed in the 1980s but that seems impossible now due to both fiancial and environmental objections by the green front. A34 needs to be improved to motorway standard as it now takes motorway volumes of traffic. West Oxon Webwatcher
  • Score: -5

8:56pm Fri 28 Sep 12

iklhik says...

Agree that the Wolvercote bypass will never be built but I'm always amazed people object to it on environmental grounds. Building a new road on an area of countryside already bisected by roads vs. having thousands of cars idling along the A40 every day... it beggars belief.
Agree that the Wolvercote bypass will never be built but I'm always amazed people object to it on environmental grounds. Building a new road on an area of countryside already bisected by roads vs. having thousands of cars idling along the A40 every day... it beggars belief. iklhik
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree