Blackbird Leys families protest against ban on ball games (From thisisoxfordshire)
When It Happens Panel Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting 'OXFORD NEWS' to 80360 or email
Blackbird Leys families protest against ban on ball games
7:00am Tuesday 17th July 2012 in News
By Rhianne Pope
Back, left to right, Cathy Cartwright, Steffanie Anderson, Connor Hockin, nine, Max Cartwright, nine, brother Leigh, 11, and Ann Davey with baby Lucian Lloyd; front, left to right: Peter, 10, and Jodi Jones, six, Tyler Hockin, nine, and Kristian Lloyd
FAMILIES in an Oxford street are protesting against council rules which stop their children playing football outside their homes.
Three young families in Furlong Street, Blackbird Leys, last month received letters from CANAcT, the Crime and Nuisance Action Team, due to the complaints of neighbours.
The children, aged between nine and 11, used to play on a grass patch at the end of the street.
But Oxford City Council said the children should play in a nearby park.
Council spokesman Louisa Dean said: “We had received some complaints from nearby residents about children kicking footballs against walls and going into gardens which can be a nuisance for some
residents.
“We have reminded them of the park that is nearby and informed them of the Positive Futures scheme. We hope that they will engage with Positive Futures which provides activities outside of school
hours.”
Mum-of-three Ann Davey, 33, said: “There are three young families living on the top floor of these maisonettes here.
“There are six children here and five of those are boys. And what do boys want to do? They want to play football.”
Ms Davey, mum to nine-year-old twins Tyler and Connor, said they used to play in a communal garden until the council planted large shrubs there. They then moved to the street but have now been
warned to stop.
Ms Davey said: “Neighbours complained when the boys knocked on the door to ask for their ball back.
“But then they complain when the boys, after being ignored, jump over the fence to get it instead.
“I know the neighbours will say ‘they should play somewhere else’. But there is literally nowhere else for them to go.”
Furlong Close is situated very close to a park, but the parents say their children are too young to go there alone.
Following complaints from neighbours, the three families received letters from CANAcT, run by the city council.
The letter, dated June 27, says: “It is not acceptable for people to play ball games in Furlong Close. There are appropriate facilities available for this nearby.”
It also says Community Response Teams will be patrolling the area to make sure the rules were followed.
‘No Ball Games’ signs have been put up around the street.
Jan Cosgrove, national secretary for campaign group Fair Play for Children, said: “In the last four decades, we have removed around 750,000 acres of free space for children to play in.
“We have to ask ourselves what the consequences are for keeping our children cooped up because we have reached a crisis.
“A balance needs to be struck.”
Comments(175)
Dilligaf2010
says...
7:51am Tue 17 Jul 12
..
.........what a load of tosh! It's a few minutes walk away, at most.
kaydensmummy
says...
8:13am Tue 17 Jul 12
Dilligaf2010 wrote:i know the people in this article and its the fact that my friends partner got attacked just by their house so imagine what could happen to the children !!! it may be a few minutes walk but u can not see from the masonettes to the park so the kids could be attacked at any time !!!
Furlong Close is situated very close to a park, "but the parents say their children are too young to go there alone.".............
..
.........what a load of tosh! It's a few minutes walk away, at most.
noodles78
says...
8:24am Tue 17 Jul 12
noodles78
says...
8:30am Tue 17 Jul 12
Andrew:Oxford
says...
7:36pm Tue 17 Jul 12
noodles78 wrote:I see four adults in the picture.
oh and as for this positive future scheme, where's our information about it, its been weeks now and we still received no info on it nor have we seen a patrol team around the close as yet
Surely at least one of them would be willing to walk to the park and sit and read a book, or frob/work on a mobile device whilst the children played within sight.
noodles78
says...
7:42pm Tue 17 Jul 12
Andrew:Oxford
says...
9:34pm Tue 17 Jul 12
noodles78 wrote:The same way that hundreds of other adults across the country that work full time do.
in response to u andrew 2 of the adults in the picture work full time and the other 2 have medical problems so please explain how u think they would be able to spend hours over the park supervising
Some people, to give credit to one of the Leys former local councillors, work full time *and* organise a local running & athletic groups in their spare time.
It's not hard work to take your son, daughter, niece, nephew and a few friends/neighbours to a park with a ball
As to medical problems. You'll have to explain further what the medical problems are. Just watching the trailers for the Paralympics, I'm in awe at what people can stretch themselves to do despite their bodies.
noodles78
says...
9:44pm Tue 17 Jul 12
kaydensmummy
says...
9:49pm Tue 17 Jul 12
Andrew:Oxford wrote:why should people have to explain things to people they dont know ??? do u have kids?? if so do they have a garden to play in if they do then shut up !!! these kids have nowhere to play and shouldnt be forced to go to a park when theres a perfectly good garden for them 2 play in although thats been taken away from them too !!!
noodles78 wrote:The same way that hundreds of other adults across the country that work full time do.
in response to u andrew 2 of the adults in the picture work full time and the other 2 have medical problems so please explain how u think they would be able to spend hours over the park supervising
Some people, to give credit to one of the Leys former local councillors, work full time *and* organise a local running & athletic groups in their spare time.
It's not hard work to take your son, daughter, niece, nephew and a few friends/neighbours to a park with a ball
As to medical problems. You'll have to explain further what the medical problems are. Just watching the trailers for the Paralympics, I'm in awe at what people can stretch themselves to do despite their bodies.
Dilligaf2010
says...
9:54pm Tue 17 Jul 12
noodles78
says...
9:58pm Tue 17 Jul 12
kaydensmummy
says...
10:02pm Tue 17 Jul 12
Andrew:Oxford
says...
10:35pm Tue 17 Jul 12
kaydensmummy wrote:You know, I'm mentally reading your comment with the voice of Ms Pollard.
Andrew:Oxford wrote:why should people have to explain things to people they dont know ??? do u have kids?? if so do they have a garden to play in if they do then shut up !!! these kids have nowhere to play and shouldnt be forced to go to a park when theres a perfectly good garden for them 2 play in although thats been taken away from them too !!!
noodles78 wrote:The same way that hundreds of other adults across the country that work full time do.
in response to u andrew 2 of the adults in the picture work full time and the other 2 have medical problems so please explain how u think they would be able to spend hours over the park supervising
Some people, to give credit to one of the Leys former local councillors, work full time *and* organise a local running & athletic groups in their spare time.
It's not hard work to take your son, daughter, niece, nephew and a few friends/neighbours to a park with a ball
As to medical problems. You'll have to explain further what the medical problems are. Just watching the trailers for the Paralympics, I'm in awe at what people can stretch themselves to do despite their bodies.
It's quite uncanny.
I would point out that, according to the story, the children aren't playing in a garden, but in a patch of land not far from their home - that clearly was causing their neighbours some distress.
noodles78
says...
10:39pm Tue 17 Jul 12
kaydensmummy
says...
10:43pm Tue 17 Jul 12
King Joke
says...
8:50am Wed 18 Jul 12
THe people complaining are no better than those stifling our music scene by complaining about bands playing in pubs.
We need a bit more tolerance to allow our young people's talents to flourish.,
Dilligaf2010
says...
9:57am Wed 18 Jul 12
King Joke wrote:We need more footballers? Urm no, there are already too many overpaid under worked idiots on the planet.
We need more footballers, anyone watching the Euros could see that. We need to get kids playing at every level, and of their own accord, not just just forced to at school. If the place they feel comfortable doing so is outside their own house then so be it.
THe people complaining are no better than those stifling our music scene by complaining about bands playing in pubs.
We need a bit more tolerance to allow our young people's talents to flourish.,
kaydensmummy
says...
10:00am Wed 18 Jul 12
Dilligaf2010 wrote:would u rather they were out causing trouble on the streets ??? at least they want to keep out of trouble and play with their friends and keep fit at the same time ! just a shame not everyone thinks so
King Joke wrote:We need more footballers? Urm no, there are already too many overpaid under worked idiots on the planet.
We need more footballers, anyone watching the Euros could see that. We need to get kids playing at every level, and of their own accord, not just just forced to at school. If the place they feel comfortable doing so is outside their own house then so be it.
THe people complaining are no better than those stifling our music scene by complaining about bands playing in pubs.
We need a bit more tolerance to allow our young people's talents to flourish.,
King Joke
says...
10:09am Wed 18 Jul 12
Dilligaf2010
says...
10:18am Wed 18 Jul 12
kaydensmummy wrote:And of course kicking balls against people's walls, and into gardens isn't causing trouble is it.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:would u rather they were out causing trouble on the streets ??? at least they want to keep out of trouble and play with their friends and keep fit at the same time ! just a shame not everyone thinks so
King Joke wrote:We need more footballers? Urm no, there are already too many overpaid under worked idiots on the planet.
We need more footballers, anyone watching the Euros could see that. We need to get kids playing at every level, and of their own accord, not just just forced to at school. If the place they feel comfortable doing so is outside their own house then so be it.
THe people complaining are no better than those stifling our music scene by complaining about bands playing in pubs.
We need a bit more tolerance to allow our young people's talents to flourish.,
There's still been no valid argument as to why one of the parents can't accompany the kids to the park, laziness isn't actually a medical condition.
King Joke
says...
10:38am Wed 18 Jul 12
I haven't got kids myself but can remember many years ago I think I was one myself.
Dilligaf2010
says...
11:24am Wed 18 Jul 12
King Joke wrote:Yes walls can survive the impact of a ball, but if you're sat the other side of the wall that the football's constantly hitting, it can become intolerable, I know from experience.
Walls are made out of brick and can quite easily survive a football impact - and what is wrong with throwing your neighbour's kids' ball back, rather than just moaning about them behind their backs to the authorities? Children should be encouraged to flourish, not condemned by a nation of miserable curtain-twitchers.
I haven't got kids myself but can remember many years ago I think I was one myself.
As for returning a child's ball, again, I've got no issues with that, but if it becomes a regular occurrence, then once again, it becomes intolerable, this is perhaps why the individuals started to ignore the kids, and instead opted to complain.
I have kids, although they no longer live here,and I'm not a curtain-twitcher, but I believe everybody is entitled to a bit of peace and quiet inside their own homes.
There are kids that play football out the back of where I live, but there are no issues of balls getting into people's gardens, or ricocheting off walls constantly, so they're causing no problems, the parents are often out there with them too.
JanetJ
says...
11:32am Wed 18 Jul 12
kaydensmummy wrote:It's probably pretty annoying to have footballs thumping into the side of your house and bouncing over into your garden every few minutes. Not to mention the fact that it seems to be OK for the same kids to just climb over the fence to get their ball back when the occupants won't answer the door on demand.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:would u rather they were out causing trouble on the streets ??? at least they want to keep out of trouble and play with their friends and keep fit at the same time ! just a shame not everyone thinks so
King Joke wrote:We need more footballers? Urm no, there are already too many overpaid under worked idiots on the planet.
We need more footballers, anyone watching the Euros could see that. We need to get kids playing at every level, and of their own accord, not just just forced to at school. If the place they feel comfortable doing so is outside their own house then so be it.
THe people complaining are no better than those stifling our music scene by complaining about bands playing in pubs.
We need a bit more tolerance to allow our young people's talents to flourish.,
Doctor69
says...
1:14pm Wed 18 Jul 12
JanetJ wrote:Great comments - if i was one of the neighbours i would complain too. Its not enough for these annoying brats to bang, bang, bang against the wall, they now (no doubt encouraged by the parents) climb into peoples gardens to get the ball back.
kaydensmummy wrote:It's probably pretty annoying to have footballs thumping into the side of your house and bouncing over into your garden every few minutes. Not to mention the fact that it seems to be OK for the same kids to just climb over the fence to get their ball back when the occupants won't answer the door on demand.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:would u rather they were out causing trouble on the streets ??? at least they want to keep out of trouble and play with their friends and keep fit at the same time ! just a shame not everyone thinks so
King Joke wrote:We need more footballers? Urm no, there are already too many overpaid under worked idiots on the planet.
We need more footballers, anyone watching the Euros could see that. We need to get kids playing at every level, and of their own accord, not just just forced to at school. If the place they feel comfortable doing so is outside their own house then so be it.
THe people complaining are no better than those stifling our music scene by complaining about bands playing in pubs.
We need a bit more tolerance to allow our young people's talents to flourish.,
Go down the park, or better still, join a proper football team.
Sounds to me like the parents cant be bothered to control the kids, and when adults have complained about the kids, the parents get funny.
kaydensmummy
says...
2:06pm Wed 18 Jul 12
Doctor69 wrote:considering they dont actually bang against the wall the only wall they do bang against is a wall next to the garages where there is no houses !!! its just the older generation dont want kids to have a good time !!!!!! think back to when you was kids and you was aloud to play outside your house all these kids want is their garden back or somewhere where they feel safe enough to play football! the parents do have medical problems and i know that but as we said before why should they justify themselves to people they dont know thats personal !!!
JanetJ wrote:Great comments - if i was one of the neighbours i would complain too. Its not enough for these annoying brats to bang, bang, bang against the wall, they now (no doubt encouraged by the parents) climb into peoples gardens to get the ball back.
kaydensmummy wrote:It's probably pretty annoying to have footballs thumping into the side of your house and bouncing over into your garden every few minutes. Not to mention the fact that it seems to be OK for the same kids to just climb over the fence to get their ball back when the occupants won't answer the door on demand.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:would u rather they were out causing trouble on the streets ??? at least they want to keep out of trouble and play with their friends and keep fit at the same time ! just a shame not everyone thinks so
King Joke wrote:We need more footballers? Urm no, there are already too many overpaid under worked idiots on the planet.
We need more footballers, anyone watching the Euros could see that. We need to get kids playing at every level, and of their own accord, not just just forced to at school. If the place they feel comfortable doing so is outside their own house then so be it.
THe people complaining are no better than those stifling our music scene by complaining about bands playing in pubs.
We need a bit more tolerance to allow our young people's talents to flourish.,
Go down the park, or better still, join a proper football team.
Sounds to me like the parents cant be bothered to control the kids, and when adults have complained about the kids, the parents get funny.
noodles78
says...
2:30pm Wed 18 Jul 12
i have one more thing to say
as the banner says
YOU HAD A CHILDHOOD
YOUR KIDS HAD THEIRS
NOW LET OUR KIDS TOO!!!!!!!!
Dilligaf2010
says...
2:55pm Wed 18 Jul 12
When I was a child I was allowed to play outside, but if ever a football was involved we played well away from houses, it was standard practice, maybe it was my upbringing, I've no idea.
noodles78
says...
3:01pm Wed 18 Jul 12
Dilligaf2010
says...
3:27pm Wed 18 Jul 12
........Sitting in front of the computer or TV?
## Nonny Mouse ##
says...
3:39pm Wed 18 Jul 12
noodles78 wrote:'may i add that on one occasion the kids were all outside for around 2 hours and the ball went in a garden once, is that classed as being a nuisance?'
im gobsmacked that u could call children u dont even know brats! as for the ball banging against walls its not an actual house wall its a garden wall that is nowhere near the house im talkin like 6 to 8 feet away from the house, do u seriously think the parents encourage the kids????? can i ask u doctor 69, do u live anywhere near the close? may i add that on one occasion the kids were all outside for around 2 hours and the ball went in a garden once, is that classed as being a nuisance? its just miserable gits who dont like the look of the kids and therefore are doin there very best to make sure they get into trouble, may i add that football clubs would be a great idea if the parents could actually afford it and one of the children is part of a team
i have one more thing to say
as the banner says
YOU HAD A CHILDHOOD
YOUR KIDS HAD THEIRS
NOW LET OUR KIDS TOO!!!!!!!!
Because that was, as you say, only one occasion. One of many. You try living there and flinching everytime the ball whack against your garden wall. What ever happened to simple consideration? Instead your children are encouraged to carry on however they please and if challenged to be antagonistic, fully backed up by you.
## Nonny Mouse ##
says...
3:42pm Wed 18 Jul 12
noodles78 wrote:'perfectly good garden' - It's not a garden. It's a patch of council owned grass, next to dwellings.
parents do accompany kids to the park but our argument is y should we have to when there is a perfectly good garden out the back that could be divided into an area for washing lines and a fenced area for kids to play football safely, i suggest that people should come to the close and talk to the kids and parents before runnin their mouth and calling the kids brats, i have good reasons for not goin to the park for hours with my kids but im not gonna justify myself to people i dont know
'could be divided into an area for washing lines' - What do they call that? Favela-chic?
'i have good reasons for not goin to the park for hours with my kids but im not gonna justify myself to people i dont know' - You do realise that being parent isn't an opt-out activity?
noodles78
says...
4:44pm Wed 18 Jul 12
norwood-clark2010
says...
5:54pm Wed 18 Jul 12
famalam
says...
7:00pm Wed 18 Jul 12
The real solution would be for bigger better gardens built by the council!
## Nonny Mouse ##
says...
7:17pm Wed 18 Jul 12
I had a basic state education and managed to figure out reading and writing ok......
cuckoo
says...
8:28pm Wed 18 Jul 12
1: remove the large shrubs from the communal garden and return to grass.
2: the Community Response Team focus their efforts on the park that is reported as "unsafe" for young children to play in...maybe over a resonable time period eg: between 3.30-4pm and 7pm.
Oh, and BTW: my kids... now teenagers, often played ball games in our garden (as do our neighbours young kids now) footballs etc do go astray..and YES! kids climb over garden fences to retrieve them, but rarely any ACTUAL damage done!!
BackontheMainland
says...
10:47pm Wed 18 Jul 12
Yes in our day we could go off to the park taking a sandwich and drink and play safely all day. Then again we had Park Keepers who ran them. These days we have gangs and druggies running them. Our parks aren't safe anymore and I, as an adult, wouldn't take my child to many of the smaller ones. We drive to Buryknowle or Cutteslowe where they are family friendly and safe. Not everyone has this option.
If you're working all day and have to accompany your children for hours at the park, just when do you get the time to cook a healthy meal, clean the house, wash and iron clothes....?
I think a lot of the negative comments on here definitely don't come from Mothers.
Dilligaf2010
says...
7:23am Thu 19 Jul 12
BackontheMainland wrote:"I think a lot of the negative comments on here definitely don't come from Mothers."..........
As long as the council/housing association house people in rabbit hutches without any private outside place these problems will continue.
Yes in our day we could go off to the park taking a sandwich and drink and play safely all day. Then again we had Park Keepers who ran them. These days we have gangs and druggies running them. Our parks aren't safe anymore and I, as an adult, wouldn't take my child to many of the smaller ones. We drive to Buryknowle or Cutteslowe where they are family friendly and safe. Not everyone has this option.
If you're working all day and have to accompany your children for hours at the park, just when do you get the time to cook a healthy meal, clean the house, wash and iron clothes....?
I think a lot of the negative comments on here definitely don't come from Mothers.
.........what difference does it make whether we're mothers or fathers?
kaydensmummy
says...
9:32am Thu 19 Jul 12
Andrew:Oxford wrote:yeah but no but yeah but no see what happened is the kids lost their garden and now we are trying to get it back for them !!! that ms pollard enough 4 you???? !!! and has noone realised even if the parents could take the children to the park their is a 18 month old toddler too !!! all you assume is that these people sit about all day well no they dont but they havent got the time to take the children to an unsafe park every day as they have lives too,think you should all back off unless you know the true facts !!!
kaydensmummy wrote:You know, I'm mentally reading your comment with the voice of Ms Pollard.
Andrew:Oxford wrote:why should people have to explain things to people they dont know ??? do u have kids?? if so do they have a garden to play in if they do then shut up !!! these kids have nowhere to play and shouldnt be forced to go to a park when theres a perfectly good garden for them 2 play in although thats been taken away from them too !!!
noodles78 wrote:The same way that hundreds of other adults across the country that work full time do.
in response to u andrew 2 of the adults in the picture work full time and the other 2 have medical problems so please explain how u think they would be able to spend hours over the park supervising
Some people, to give credit to one of the Leys former local councillors, work full time *and* organise a local running & athletic groups in their spare time.
It's not hard work to take your son, daughter, niece, nephew and a few friends/neighbours to a park with a ball
As to medical problems. You'll have to explain further what the medical problems are. Just watching the trailers for the Paralympics, I'm in awe at what people can stretch themselves to do despite their bodies.
It's quite uncanny.
I would point out that, according to the story, the children aren't playing in a garden, but in a patch of land not far from their home - that clearly was causing their neighbours some distress.
BackontheMainland
says...
10:37am Thu 19 Jul 12
Dilligaf2010 wrote:Because generally Mothers are the main carers of children and carry out the majority of household chores. Mothers are also mainly the parent left with the care of their children if the relationship breaks down.
BackontheMainland wrote:"I think a lot of the negative comments on here definitely don't come from Mothers."..........
As long as the council/housing association house people in rabbit hutches without any private outside place these problems will continue.
Yes in our day we could go off to the park taking a sandwich and drink and play safely all day. Then again we had Park Keepers who ran them. These days we have gangs and druggies running them. Our parks aren't safe anymore and I, as an adult, wouldn't take my child to many of the smaller ones. We drive to Buryknowle or Cutteslowe where they are family friendly and safe. Not everyone has this option.
If you're working all day and have to accompany your children for hours at the park, just when do you get the time to cook a healthy meal, clean the house, wash and iron clothes....?
I think a lot of the negative comments on here definitely don't come from Mothers.
.........what difference does it make whether we're mothers or fathers?
Maybe you personally wore a pinny, vacuumed and waved your feather duster; cooked hearty meals and cakes; wiped noses and bottoms and had primary care of your children as a Father, but you would be in the minority.
Dilligaf2010
says...
10:39am Thu 19 Jul 12
kaydensmummy wrote:"has no one realised even if the parents could take the children to the park their is a 18 month old toddler too".......and your point is?
Andrew:Oxford wrote:yeah but no but yeah but no see what happened is the kids lost their garden and now we are trying to get it back for them !!! that ms pollard enough 4 you???? !!! and has noone realised even if the parents could take the children to the park their is a 18 month old toddler too !!! all you assume is that these people sit about all day well no they dont but they havent got the time to take the children to an unsafe park every day as they have lives too,think you should all back off unless you know the true facts !!!
kaydensmummy wrote:You know, I'm mentally reading your comment with the voice of Ms Pollard.
Andrew:Oxford wrote:why should people have to explain things to people they dont know ??? do u have kids?? if so do they have a garden to play in if they do then shut up !!! these kids have nowhere to play and shouldnt be forced to go to a park when theres a perfectly good garden for them 2 play in although thats been taken away from them too !!!
noodles78 wrote:The same way that hundreds of other adults across the country that work full time do.
in response to u andrew 2 of the adults in the picture work full time and the other 2 have medical problems so please explain how u think they would be able to spend hours over the park supervising
Some people, to give credit to one of the Leys former local councillors, work full time *and* organise a local running & athletic groups in their spare time.
It's not hard work to take your son, daughter, niece, nephew and a few friends/neighbours to a park with a ball
As to medical problems. You'll have to explain further what the medical problems are. Just watching the trailers for the Paralympics, I'm in awe at what people can stretch themselves to do despite their bodies.
It's quite uncanny.
I would point out that, according to the story, the children aren't playing in a garden, but in a patch of land not far from their home - that clearly was causing their neighbours some distress.
"all you assume is that these people sit about all day well no they dont but they havent got the time to take the children to an unsafe park every day as they have lives too".........Nobody has suggested all the parents take all the kids every day, and I can't begin to imagine what those parents that aren't employed do at home that leaves them so little time, and as for your comment "as they have lives too", I didn't realise children had become disposable items, I've always considered mine to be an integral part of my life, even though they're not here.
"think you should all back off unless you know the true facts !!!"........
.........go on then, enlighten us...
BackontheMainland
says...
10:49am Thu 19 Jul 12
Dilligaf2010 wrote:and perhaps you Dilligaf2010 too could come off your sickness benefit and get a job typing on a computer as your condition doesn't seem to stop you posting endlessly on here... Pot - Kettle methinks
But those adults with "medical" problems appear to have managed to get out of their homes for the photograph to be taken, so their conditions don't render them immobile.
Dilligaf2010
says...
11:05am Thu 19 Jul 12
BackontheMainland wrote:"Pot - Kettle methinks"......not at all, completely different scenario.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:and perhaps you Dilligaf2010 too could come off your sickness benefit and get a job typing on a computer as your condition doesn't seem to stop you posting endlessly on here... Pot - Kettle methinks
But those adults with "medical" problems appear to have managed to get out of their homes for the photograph to be taken, so their conditions don't render them immobile.
BackontheMainland
says...
12:28pm Thu 19 Jul 12
Dilligaf2010 wrote:Go on then, enlighten us...
BackontheMainland wrote:"Pot - Kettle methinks"......not at all, completely different scenario.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:and perhaps you Dilligaf2010 too could come off your sickness benefit and get a job typing on a computer as your condition doesn't seem to stop you posting endlessly on here... Pot - Kettle methinks
But those adults with "medical" problems appear to have managed to get out of their homes for the photograph to be taken, so their conditions don't render them immobile.
Dilligaf2010
says...
12:51pm Thu 19 Jul 12
BackontheMainland wrote:Foxtrot Oscar.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:Go on then, enlighten us...
BackontheMainland wrote:"Pot - Kettle methinks"......not at all, completely different scenario.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:and perhaps you Dilligaf2010 too could come off your sickness benefit and get a job typing on a computer as your condition doesn't seem to stop you posting endlessly on here... Pot - Kettle methinks
But those adults with "medical" problems appear to have managed to get out of their homes for the photograph to be taken, so their conditions don't render them immobile.
kaydensmummy
says...
12:58pm Thu 19 Jul 12
Doctor69
says...
1:07pm Thu 19 Jul 12
I dont have kids myself, but if i did, i would encourage the same behaviour. Play in the garden or go to the park. I definatly wouldnt go crying to the press because they wernt allowed to use land next to a neighbours house.
Seriously, parents of these kids, get a grip. Take the children to the park if it isnt safe for them to go alone. If that is to much effort for you, maybe you should consider moving somewhere that has a garden?
I understand kids need to play etc, but adults who have had a hard day at work need time to destress and relax in the comfort of their own homes, instead of being wound up by some chav kids!
A close isnt designed for football, its designed to live in. Parks are designed to play in. Simple!
kaydensmummy
says...
1:10pm Thu 19 Jul 12
kaydensmummy
says...
1:11pm Thu 19 Jul 12
Doctor69
says...
1:22pm Thu 19 Jul 12
I will say it agin, if they were my kids i would take them down the park and play with them, not encourage them to cry to the press 'we are so hard done by' blah blah.
As for the garden which now has shrubs, maybe the older generation prefer it that way? You have a park, use it and stop crying.
noodles78
says...
1:31pm Thu 19 Jul 12
YOU HAD A CHILDHOOD
YOUR KIDS HAD THEIRS
NOW LET OUR KIDS TOO!!!!!
or is it that i should be lettin them out on streets to rob people n nick cars, or maybe they should be cooped up indoors playin on computers and never havin any exercise, u seem to know everythin so maybe u can give me the answer hey
Doctor69
says...
1:34pm Thu 19 Jul 12
kaydensmummy
says...
1:36pm Thu 19 Jul 12
noodles78
says...
1:38pm Thu 19 Jul 12
kaydensmummy
says...
1:38pm Thu 19 Jul 12
## Nonny Mouse ##
says...
1:45pm Thu 19 Jul 12
Prove it. Have you access to view the deeds for the property?
'where exactly is the harm in that?'
In that they are causing an anti-social disturbance to the other residents and trepassing on their property to retrieve balls etc.
Dilligaf2010
says...
1:46pm Thu 19 Jul 12
kaydensmummy wrote:I'm not a parent saying they have no time to take their kids to the park.
yeah come on dilligaf enlighten us because you want to know what they do all day so now u tell us what u do all day !!! everyday when i check the oxfordmail website youve always had to comment so obviously all you do is sit on your fat lazy bone idol **** !!! yeah kids are a main part of our lives but just because we have kids doesnt mean we arent aloud a life you idiot !! some of us those who are part of this protest go to college or work or do courses you know !!! so unless you know these people then i would suggest you keep your gob sealed
I have plenty of time to cook, clean, wash and iron, something I also did when my kids were at home, and as it happens at the time I was in full time employment, as was my wife, and I had never had a day out of work from the age of 16.
Yes I spend a lot of time on my computer, it's how I keep in touch with the outside world, I'm being treated for severe clinical depression and anxiety, one of the issues of my illness is paranoia and a mistrust of people, so crowds and enclosed spaces with unfamiliar people are something I avoid.
Once I feel I'm mentally strong enough to return to work, I will in a heartbeat, believe me, even though there's little I can do about it at the moment, I feel guilty about living on benefits, even though I've paid probably about £200k in tax and national insurance payments during my working life.
As for calling me an idiot because you think I said you're not entitled to a life, I never said that, I merely stated that children are an integral part of our lives, we can't choose when to incorporate them.
I'm quite aware that some of the parents aren't there all the time, but neither are the kids, and when the kids are there, not all the parents aren't, you're part of a community you should help each other.
I'm guessing you're not one of the ones that works, or goes to college, because you appear to have plenty of time to post on here too.
kaydensmummy
says...
1:50pm Thu 19 Jul 12
kaydensmummy
says...
1:52pm Thu 19 Jul 12
noodles78
says...
1:54pm Thu 19 Jul 12
Doctor69
says...
1:54pm Thu 19 Jul 12
You on the other hand appear to have done things differently. Oh i have 3 children...i cant afford to buy a home, council please give me a house.
You are in a fortunate position to have housing provided for you, something i have never had the opportunity to be given. Stop moaning, or get a job, save some money and move. Stop sponging off of society and upsetting the neighbours!
Dilligaf2010
says...
1:55pm Thu 19 Jul 12
BackontheMainland wrote:I never wore a pinny, but as my wife worked days, and I worked shifts, we shared responsibility, I'm perfectly capable of cooking for 14, washing, ironing, and all the rest of the household responsibilities, and took great pleasure in looking after my kids, no matter what time of day, or night.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:Because generally Mothers are the main carers of children and carry out the majority of household chores. Mothers are also mainly the parent left with the care of their children if the relationship breaks down.
BackontheMainland wrote:"I think a lot of the negative comments on here definitely don't come from Mothers."..........
As long as the council/housing association house people in rabbit hutches without any private outside place these problems will continue.
Yes in our day we could go off to the park taking a sandwich and drink and play safely all day. Then again we had Park Keepers who ran them. These days we have gangs and druggies running them. Our parks aren't safe anymore and I, as an adult, wouldn't take my child to many of the smaller ones. We drive to Buryknowle or Cutteslowe where they are family friendly and safe. Not everyone has this option.
If you're working all day and have to accompany your children for hours at the park, just when do you get the time to cook a healthy meal, clean the house, wash and iron clothes....?
I think a lot of the negative comments on here definitely don't come from Mothers.
.........what difference does it make whether we're mothers or fathers?
Maybe you personally wore a pinny, vacuumed and waved your feather duster; cooked hearty meals and cakes; wiped noses and bottoms and had primary care of your children as a Father, but you would be in the minority.
Doctor69
says...
1:55pm Thu 19 Jul 12
BackontheMainland
says...
1:58pm Thu 19 Jul 12
Dilligaf2010 wrote:Resorting to foul language, surely a sign of ignorance tut! tut! So you can judge their disabilities so long as nobody judges yours.
BackontheMainland wrote:Foxtrot Oscar.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:Go on then, enlighten us...
BackontheMainland wrote:"Pot - Kettle methinks"......not at all, completely different scenario.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:and perhaps you Dilligaf2010 too could come off your sickness benefit and get a job typing on a computer as your condition doesn't seem to stop you posting endlessly on here... Pot - Kettle methinks
But those adults with "medical" problems appear to have managed to get out of their homes for the photograph to be taken, so their conditions don't render them immobile.
noodles78
says...
2:00pm Thu 19 Jul 12
Dilligaf2010
says...
2:00pm Thu 19 Jul 12
noodles78
says...
2:03pm Thu 19 Jul 12
noodles78
says...
2:12pm Thu 19 Jul 12
Doctor69 wrote:i also worked from 16 and due to havin kids and illness i have not worked since the age of 24, i'm now 33 and would give anything to go to work but my illnesses prevent that from happening, i would love to own my house but never gonna happen, i don't see why people like myself should be made to feel worthless and useless by people like u, never judge a book by its cover!
I work full time, have done since i was 16, I'm now 31. I live in a house i have bought with my girlfriend. We work hard to pay the bills and mortgage. The reason we havent had children yet is due to money.
You on the other hand appear to have done things differently. Oh i have 3 children...i cant afford to buy a home, council please give me a house.
You are in a fortunate position to have housing provided for you, something i have never had the opportunity to be given. Stop moaning, or get a job, save some money and move. Stop sponging off of society and upsetting the neighbours!
Doctor69
says...
2:17pm Thu 19 Jul 12
I like the way you conveniently overlooked my comments regarding hard work to buy a home.
Is it time for Jeremy Kyle yet??
Dilligaf2010
says...
2:18pm Thu 19 Jul 12
noodles78 wrote:Yes I did learn to read, that's why I asked if you were one of those in the photo, after you'd stated you were one of those involved, there's a difference.
did u ever learn to read because im sure it says a few comments ago that yes i am and i will fight for my kids to have a safe place to play no matter what, i seriously think people who are puttin negative comments should come to the close and speak to the kids and parents and then maybe they would see for themselves these kids arent actually that bad its just the way they have been made out to be
Dilligaf2010
says...
2:19pm Thu 19 Jul 12
BackontheMainland wrote:I'm not a parent saying they can't go down to the park with their kids, due to "medical" conditions, so my current situation has nothing to do with it.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:Resorting to foul language, surely a sign of ignorance tut! tut! So you can judge their disabilities so long as nobody judges yours.
BackontheMainland wrote:Foxtrot Oscar.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:Go on then, enlighten us...
BackontheMainland wrote:"Pot - Kettle methinks"......not at all, completely different scenario.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:and perhaps you Dilligaf2010 too could come off your sickness benefit and get a job typing on a computer as your condition doesn't seem to stop you posting endlessly on here... Pot - Kettle methinks
But those adults with "medical" problems appear to have managed to get out of their homes for the photograph to be taken, so their conditions don't render them immobile.
BackontheMainland
says...
2:28pm Thu 19 Jul 12
kaydensmummy wrote:nonny mouse is employed by the council, but in his/her own words "is too well ensconced" and so has liberty to post on here during paid work time.
nonny mouse im guessing your one of the old battle axes that keep complaining !!!! if you have a problem say it to anyone of our faces dont hide behind a computer screen ok,the kids want to be able to live their lives no kid should have to be locked up inside or forced out there own area !!!! and no i dont care if you dont like what i say because its the truth
## Nonny Mouse ##
says...
2:34pm Thu 19 Jul 12
No one is stopping/forcing anything. The public services are available (The park) but you refuse to use them because of bone idleness. The only
'and no i dont care if you dont like what i say because its the truthreason they are addled with drug dealers is because no-one goes there!'
Well argued, case closed.
'if people were to open their doors to the kids they wouldnt be trespassin'
So, you are putting the responsibility of your children's behaviour onto complete strangers? How noble.
'u run to the council and police and pop their footballs!!!! WHICH MAY I ADD IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE'
Possession is 9/10ths of the law. If said ball is on their property, doesn't it make it their ball to do what they please with?
A34North
says...
2:37pm Thu 19 Jul 12
## Nonny Mouse ##
says...
2:42pm Thu 19 Jul 12
'if people were to open their doors to the kids they wouldnt be trespassin'
That's like a mugger saying 'If people were to give me thier phones and wallets, i wouldn't have to maim them and steal from them' is it not?
Good parenting.
Doctor69
says...
2:43pm Thu 19 Jul 12
noodles78
says...
2:44pm Thu 19 Jul 12
BackontheMainland
says...
2:46pm Thu 19 Jul 12
Doctor69 wrote:But these are just older versions of the council tenants who have children and were given a council home, whom you seem to condemn as spongers. So in your scenario these older generation should have gone back to work and bought their own homes once their children had grown up.
Also, have some respect for the elderly.
noodles78
says...
2:47pm Thu 19 Jul 12
noodles78
says...
2:52pm Thu 19 Jul 12
## Nonny Mouse ## wrote:no, what i mean is instead of always being against the kids try workin with them to find a more suitable solution, they are all pretty good kids but get angered but the negativity of everyone around them who were once kids themselves
Feel i need to highlight this quote again as i find it troubling:
'if people were to open their doors to the kids they wouldnt be trespassin'
That's like a mugger saying 'If people were to give me thier phones and wallets, i wouldn't have to maim them and steal from them' is it not?
Good parenting.
## Nonny Mouse ##
says...
3:00pm Thu 19 Jul 12
'Stop bothering those poor old people and go and play in the park'
noodles78
says...
3:04pm Thu 19 Jul 12
BackontheMainland
says...
3:15pm Thu 19 Jul 12
Doctor69 wrote:Is it time for you to do some 'hard work' yet? Or are you yet another employee stealing your paid time to post your pompous comments on websites? Hope they don't catch you as it's a sackable offence, and then how would you pay your mortgage?
It isn’t acceptable to swear at kids like that, but I bet the kids aren’t little angels either!
I like the way you conveniently overlooked my comments regarding hard work to buy a home.
Is it time for Jeremy Kyle yet??
## Nonny Mouse ##
says...
3:22pm Thu 19 Jul 12
Of course there was, you just didn't know about it because it wasn't widely reported. The only reason there is statistically more crime is that there are more people.
I think you would find that if you and another parent for example were to take a group of children to the park for an hours kick about, no one would stab you. No one would snatch your bag. No one would try and sell you drugs.
The only illness you have is believing the scaremongering tattle in the local rags. People, on the whole, are nice. People, on the whole, stop being nice when other people take the p*ss such as causing anti-social disturbances directly outside their front doors.
## Nonny Mouse ##
says...
3:30pm Thu 19 Jul 12
I think you are fighting a losing battle here. You have tried to force the council's hand by rallying public support for your cause but as you can see from the response, you have very little.
BackontheMainland
says...
3:37pm Thu 19 Jul 12
## Nonny Mouse ## wrote:And you, as a council employee, have no right to squander the money I pay in taxes by using your employed time to post your biased pro council views on this website!
And for the record, you have no rights for your children to be able to play football within a specific radius of your home. Your neighbours however DO have the right of 'quiet enjoyment' in their homes.
I think you are fighting a losing battle here. You have tried to force the council's hand by rallying public support for your cause but as you can see from the response, you have very little.
Doctor69
says...
3:40pm Thu 19 Jul 12
BackontheMainland wrote:Good try, but a fail im afraid....must try harder. x
Doctor69 wrote:Is it time for you to do some 'hard work' yet? Or are you yet another employee stealing your paid time to post your pompous comments on websites? Hope they don't catch you as it's a sackable offence, and then how would you pay your mortgage?
It isn’t acceptable to swear at kids like that, but I bet the kids aren’t little angels either!
I like the way you conveniently overlooked my comments regarding hard work to buy a home.
Is it time for Jeremy Kyle yet??
Doctor69
says...
3:42pm Thu 19 Jul 12
BackontheMainland wrote:again, nice try. x
Doctor69 wrote:But these are just older versions of the council tenants who have children and were given a council home, whom you seem to condemn as spongers. So in your scenario these older generation should have gone back to work and bought their own homes once their children had grown up.
Also, have some respect for the elderly.
noodles78
says...
3:54pm Thu 19 Jul 12
## Nonny Mouse ## wrote:children have every right to be able to play near their home!!!!!!!!! unless u r a police officer and u can quote exact laws then please keep ur comments to urself, and yes neighbours are allowed peace but then so r the kids but as the neighbours feel fit to give them hassle then they should be able to accept hassle back
And for the record, you have no rights for your children to be able to play football within a specific radius of your home. Your neighbours however DO have the right of 'quiet enjoyment' in their homes.
I think you are fighting a losing battle here. You have tried to force the council's hand by rallying public support for your cause but as you can see from the response, you have very little.
noodles78
says...
3:58pm Thu 19 Jul 12
Doctor69 wrote:r u prepared to come to furlong close and tell the kids and parents that the kids are chavs???????
When i was a child, i used to play in the garden at home, or i would go to the park. My parents wouldnt allow me to play football outside others houses as its annoying to them.
I dont have kids myself, but if i did, i would encourage the same behaviour. Play in the garden or go to the park. I definatly wouldnt go crying to the press because they wernt allowed to use land next to a neighbours house.
Seriously, parents of these kids, get a grip. Take the children to the park if it isnt safe for them to go alone. If that is to much effort for you, maybe you should consider moving somewhere that has a garden?
I understand kids need to play etc, but adults who have had a hard day at work need time to destress and relax in the comfort of their own homes, instead of being wound up by some chav kids!
A close isnt designed for football, its designed to live in. Parks are designed to play in. Simple!
Doctor69
says...
4:12pm Thu 19 Jul 12
noodles78 wrote:Why would I want to do that?
Doctor69 wrote:r u prepared to come to furlong close and tell the kids and parents that the kids are chavs???????
When i was a child, i used to play in the garden at home, or i would go to the park. My parents wouldnt allow me to play football outside others houses as its annoying to them.
I dont have kids myself, but if i did, i would encourage the same behaviour. Play in the garden or go to the park. I definatly wouldnt go crying to the press because they wernt allowed to use land next to a neighbours house.
Seriously, parents of these kids, get a grip. Take the children to the park if it isnt safe for them to go alone. If that is to much effort for you, maybe you should consider moving somewhere that has a garden?
I understand kids need to play etc, but adults who have had a hard day at work need time to destress and relax in the comfort of their own homes, instead of being wound up by some chav kids!
A close isnt designed for football, its designed to live in. Parks are designed to play in. Simple!
noodles78
says...
4:15pm Thu 19 Jul 12
## Nonny Mouse ##
says...
4:24pm Thu 19 Jul 12
Their words, not mine.
Doctor69
says...
4:25pm Thu 19 Jul 12
JamTay81
says...
4:49pm Thu 19 Jul 12
noodles78
says...
4:58pm Thu 19 Jul 12
## Nonny Mouse ## wrote:but surely mr i work full time would have a car n therefore not have any problems gettin in to the close to see the parents and kids, and may i add if u type furlong close into the search bar u will find lots of stories regarding under the bridge which is a known druggie spot, we have to live here and therefore we have the right to keep the kids close to us so we can see them
I wouldn't Doc. If it is as bad as they say it is, you are bound to get stabbed/stolen from/high on your way to or from.....
Their words, not mine.
noodles78
says...
5:00pm Thu 19 Jul 12
Doctor69 wrote:i am one of the parents!!!!!!
Very true, but I'm not going to waste my time coming to argue with you in a street. Just get the parents and kids to read these comments. Then they can see how supporting the county are towards their cause?
Dilligaf2010
says...
5:02pm Thu 19 Jul 12
Perhaps it's time for some parents to experience exercise too, and take a load of kids to the park.
noodles78
says...
5:05pm Thu 19 Jul 12
Dilligaf2010 wrote:in a previous comment i put that just recently (whilst i was at the park with my children) i witnessed a drug deal in the park area in full view of the kids, is this really wot i should be lettin my 3 children see?
I've never been a drug user, so have limited experience of the way of life, but I find it hard to believe that the park, a large open space, visible from many difference perspectives, would be somewhere drug dealers and users, would choose to carry out their transactions, surely they'd do them somewhere less visible, as for the stabbings and bag snatching, if nobody's been using the park, I suspect the perpetrators have moved on to a different area.
Perhaps it's time for some parents to experience exercise too, and take a load of kids to the park.
Dilligaf2010
says...
5:15pm Thu 19 Jul 12
noodles78 wrote:I'm sure these alleged drug deals aren't happening 24/7, so there are obviously ample opportunities for playing football etc., how can you be so certain it was a drug deal you saw, do dealers and users wear badges?
Dilligaf2010 wrote:in a previous comment i put that just recently (whilst i was at the park with my children) i witnessed a drug deal in the park area in full view of the kids, is this really wot i should be lettin my 3 children see?
I've never been a drug user, so have limited experience of the way of life, but I find it hard to believe that the park, a large open space, visible from many difference perspectives, would be somewhere drug dealers and users, would choose to carry out their transactions, surely they'd do them somewhere less visible, as for the stabbings and bag snatching, if nobody's been using the park, I suspect the perpetrators have moved on to a different area.
Perhaps it's time for some parents to experience exercise too, and take a load of kids to the park.
## Nonny Mouse ##
says...
5:51pm Thu 19 Jul 12
Or y'know, you could just continue to get sniffy about the rest of the world agreeing that it is unacceptable to kick footballs around within feet of people homes/cars.
doggiedoggie
says...
6:08pm Thu 19 Jul 12
## Nonny Mouse ## wrote:HAVE THE COUNCIL GIVEN REASON FOR PUTTING SHRUBS INTO THE GRASSED AREA THEY HAD ?
I have no intention of coming over and calling you 'chavs' or whatnot, but if you like, i could come round and show you the park that is 140 metres to the south of you and the ACTUAL FOOTBALL FIELD that is 225 metres to the north?
Or y'know, you could just continue to get sniffy about the rest of the world agreeing that it is unacceptable to kick footballs around within feet of people homes/cars.
## Nonny Mouse ##
says...
6:34pm Thu 19 Jul 12
noodles78
says...
6:35pm Thu 19 Jul 12
doggiedoggie wrote:yes the council have given reason, because the older people in studio flats downstairs didnt like the kids playin ball in their, my argument is y can they not fence off an area in the garden for the kids and they wouldnt be a nuisance to anyone
## Nonny Mouse ## wrote:HAVE THE COUNCIL GIVEN REASON FOR PUTTING SHRUBS INTO THE GRASSED AREA THEY HAD ?
I have no intention of coming over and calling you 'chavs' or whatnot, but if you like, i could come round and show you the park that is 140 metres to the south of you and the ACTUAL FOOTBALL FIELD that is 225 metres to the north?
Or y'know, you could just continue to get sniffy about the rest of the world agreeing that it is unacceptable to kick footballs around within feet of people homes/cars.
noodles78
says...
6:36pm Thu 19 Jul 12
## Nonny Mouse ## wrote:im sorry but exactly wot has cars n walls got to do with the garden out the back of the maisonettes
I'll check the file. Perhaps it was to deter your little angels from hammering the bejeejus out of people's walls/cars with footballs?
Dilligaf2010
says...
6:40pm Thu 19 Jul 12
noodles78 wrote:"my argument is y can they not fence off an area in the garden for the kids and they wouldnt be a nuisance to anyone"........
doggiedoggie wrote:yes the council have given reason, because the older people in studio flats downstairs didnt like the kids playin ball in their, my argument is y can they not fence off an area in the garden for the kids and they wouldnt be a nuisance to anyone
## Nonny Mouse ## wrote:HAVE THE COUNCIL GIVEN REASON FOR PUTTING SHRUBS INTO THE GRASSED AREA THEY HAD ?
I have no intention of coming over and calling you 'chavs' or whatnot, but if you like, i could come round and show you the park that is 140 metres to the south of you and the ACTUAL FOOTBALL FIELD that is 225 metres to the north?
Or y'know, you could just continue to get sniffy about the rest of the world agreeing that it is unacceptable to kick footballs around within feet of people homes/cars.
.........perhaps because there's a perfectly adequate park a couple of minutes down the road? Just a guess.
Captain J
says...
6:42pm Thu 19 Jul 12
Blimey. I wish I'd grown up so close to THREE FULL SIZED FOOTBALL PITCHES. I wouldn't have had to play football in the street so much...
noodles78
says...
6:43pm Thu 19 Jul 12
## Nonny Mouse ## wrote:im fully aware of where the park and football field are situated i have lived in bbl for 9 years, as for the actual football field u r talkin about it is mainly used as a dog walkin field apart from at weekends so am i meant to put my 18 month at risk by allowin him to play with dog muck???????????
I have no intention of coming over and calling you 'chavs' or whatnot, but if you like, i could come round and show you the park that is 140 metres to the south of you and the ACTUAL FOOTBALL FIELD that is 225 metres to the north?
Or y'know, you could just continue to get sniffy about the rest of the world agreeing that it is unacceptable to kick footballs around within feet of people homes/cars.
and as i have previously said in the 2 years i have lived here not one car or window or anythin has been damaged so i ask really wot is ur point?????
noodles78
says...
6:45pm Thu 19 Jul 12
Captain J wrote:three pitches that are used as a dog walkin area!!!!!!!
Just typed "furlong close oxford" into google maps.
Blimey. I wish I'd grown up so close to THREE FULL SIZED FOOTBALL PITCHES. I wouldn't have had to play football in the street so much...
noodles78
says...
6:48pm Thu 19 Jul 12
noodles78
says...
6:52pm Thu 19 Jul 12
## Nonny Mouse ## wrote:u check the file and when u have u can bring the paperwork to us to read properly as we only got told it was being done cos of the downstairs residents
I'll check the file. Perhaps it was to deter your little angels from hammering the bejeejus out of people's walls/cars with footballs?
## Nonny Mouse ##
says...
6:56pm Thu 19 Jul 12
noodles78 wrote:My mistake, i thought you were refering to the patch of grass pictured at the top of this article. Anyway, that bit around the back is hardly big enough to swing a cat, let alone play football.
## Nonny Mouse ## wrote:im sorry but exactly wot has cars n walls got to do with the garden out the back of the maisonettes
I'll check the file. Perhaps it was to deter your little angels from hammering the bejeejus out of people's walls/cars with footballs?
'three pitches that are used as a dog walkin area!!!!'
Now, that is a different matter. Had this been a protest over inconsiderate dog owners using a municiple field as a dog toilet, you would have had my full support. It's disgusting.
(See, i'm a person of the people....)
noodles78
says...
7:04pm Thu 19 Jul 12
this whole thing isnt about the bit of green its about gettin the garden back to keep the kids away from the green and stoppin the complaints, yes i get the point the park isnt that far away but as a parent im allowed to choose whether or not i send my kids their, young children are more vulnerable nowadays than ever and so as parents we feel its our right to have a safe space. i.e the back garden so our kids are protected and where we can see them
Dilligaf2010
says...
7:55pm Thu 19 Jul 12
noodles78 wrote:I thought this was all about the inability to play football, can you do that on swings etc.?
oh n just to let all u negative people know i have been to the park with my children but had to make them go home again as it was full of teenagers and dossers who had taken up root on most of the swings etc and so there was nowhere for my 18 month old to play and even when they were asked to move they ignored it!!!!!!!
You have 3 kids, one of them being 18 months old, so I'm guessing you have a partner, is he incapable of looking after the toddler, or taking the older kids to play football?
Instead of protesting, perhaps you can work with CANacT, with regard to the unsavoury individuals that you have said frequent the park, that would be a benefit to the whole neighbourhood, not just a few families.
Doctor69
says...
8:56pm Thu 19 Jul 12
For the record I am a senior management consultant for an independent software firm. Does it actually matter though?
GTS kiddy
says...
10:08pm Thu 19 Jul 12
Please let the kids play football as llong as they not damaging anything then let them be!!!
doggiedoggie
says...
10:20pm Thu 19 Jul 12
GTS kiddy wrote:well said i'm behind the parents 100% the children are asking for some where to play safley as a parent of 3 my children had no where to play when they were little it only takes 1 to spoil what they had.
For goodness sake you lot, everybody moans that all kids do nowadays is sit in on games consoles and computers and these kids are making the effort to go out and get some exercise, We were all kids once, I played in the street when I was young and never got into trouble, People nowadays are so miserable and grumpy,
Please let the kids play football as llong as they not damaging anything then let them be!!!
Dilligaf2010
says...
11:04pm Thu 19 Jul 12
doggiedoggie wrote:These kids have somewhere to play, but their parents aren't willing to take them there.
GTS kiddy wrote:well said i'm behind the parents 100% the children are asking for some where to play safley as a parent of 3 my children had no where to play when they were little it only takes 1 to spoil what they had.
For goodness sake you lot, everybody moans that all kids do nowadays is sit in on games consoles and computers and these kids are making the effort to go out and get some exercise, We were all kids once, I played in the street when I was young and never got into trouble, People nowadays are so miserable and grumpy,
Please let the kids play football as llong as they not damaging anything then let them be!!!
doggiedoggie
says...
6:05am Fri 20 Jul 12
Dilligaf2010 wrote:they are not willing mmmmmmmmmmmm with the amount of dog poop in parks these days & the older kids with their dogs i would want my kids close to home i myself have seen drug deals but what is the point of saying anything because nothing gets done ! Dare i say about missing children that have been found dead because their parents let them out & some1 took them. This argument is going to be on going for a long time. 1 question why did the council put young family's in up stairs flats ?
doggiedoggie wrote:These kids have somewhere to play, but their parents aren't willing to take them there.
GTS kiddy wrote:well said i'm behind the parents 100% the children are asking for some where to play safley as a parent of 3 my children had no where to play when they were little it only takes 1 to spoil what they had.
For goodness sake you lot, everybody moans that all kids do nowadays is sit in on games consoles and computers and these kids are making the effort to go out and get some exercise, We were all kids once, I played in the street when I was young and never got into trouble, People nowadays are so miserable and grumpy,
Please let the kids play football as llong as they not damaging anything then let them be!!!
GTS kiddy
says...
7:17am Fri 20 Jul 12
doggiedoggie wrote:-18 for my original post. you people are all so miserable and grumpy.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:they are not willing mmmmmmmmmmmm with the amount of dog poop in parks these days & the older kids with their dogs i would want my kids close to home i myself have seen drug deals but what is the point of saying anything because nothing gets done ! Dare i say about missing children that have been found dead because their parents let them out & some1 took them. This argument is going to be on going for a long time. 1 question why did the council put young family's in up stairs flats ?
doggiedoggie wrote:These kids have somewhere to play, but their parents aren't willing to take them there.
GTS kiddy wrote:well said i'm behind the parents 100% the children are asking for some where to play safley as a parent of 3 my children had no where to play when they were little it only takes 1 to spoil what they had.
For goodness sake you lot, everybody moans that all kids do nowadays is sit in on games consoles and computers and these kids are making the effort to go out and get some exercise, We were all kids once, I played in the street when I was young and never got into trouble, People nowadays are so miserable and grumpy,
Please let the kids play football as llong as they not damaging anything then let them be!!!
I bet you have all forgotten you were young once and needed somewhere to play!!
I feel sorry for kids nowadays. Cos they not allowed to do this not allowed to do that.
We have kids playing footy in our street a few people moan. But they forget their kids did it when they were younger! Maybe the councils should hire a security guard for all parks now so the younger kids can go there safely.
Also. If you have taken your 2 or 3 year old to the swings would u want someone in there kicking a football about. ??
People nowadays are so miserable and selfish!!
JanetJ
says...
9:11am Fri 20 Jul 12
doggiedoggie wrote:You could also question why they have had children when they have nowhere appropriate for them to live
Dilligaf2010 wrote:they are not willing mmmmmmmmmmmm with the amount of dog poop in parks these days & the older kids with their dogs i would want my kids close to home i myself have seen drug deals but what is the point of saying anything because nothing gets done ! Dare i say about missing children that have been found dead because their parents let them out & some1 took them. This argument is going to be on going for a long time. 1 question why did the council put young family's in up stairs flats ?
doggiedoggie wrote:These kids have somewhere to play, but their parents aren't willing to take them there.
GTS kiddy wrote:well said i'm behind the parents 100% the children are asking for some where to play safley as a parent of 3 my children had no where to play when they were little it only takes 1 to spoil what they had.
For goodness sake you lot, everybody moans that all kids do nowadays is sit in on games consoles and computers and these kids are making the effort to go out and get some exercise, We were all kids once, I played in the street when I was young and never got into trouble, People nowadays are so miserable and grumpy,
Please let the kids play football as llong as they not damaging anything then let them be!!!
kaydensmummy
says...
9:29am Fri 20 Jul 12
JanetJ wrote:it doesnt matter if u live in a flat,house,bungalow whatsoever as long as those children have a roof over their head !!! im a mum to a 13 month old toddler and i live in a flat so should i not have a child because of where i live ummmmmmm no !!! get over yourself janetj your pathetic love
doggiedoggie wrote:You could also question why they have had children when they have nowhere appropriate for them to live
Dilligaf2010 wrote:they are not willing mmmmmmmmmmmm with the amount of dog poop in parks these days & the older kids with their dogs i would want my kids close to home i myself have seen drug deals but what is the point of saying anything because nothing gets done ! Dare i say about missing children that have been found dead because their parents let them out & some1 took them. This argument is going to be on going for a long time. 1 question why did the council put young family's in up stairs flats ?
doggiedoggie wrote:These kids have somewhere to play, but their parents aren't willing to take them there.
GTS kiddy wrote:well said i'm behind the parents 100% the children are asking for some where to play safley as a parent of 3 my children had no where to play when they were little it only takes 1 to spoil what they had.
For goodness sake you lot, everybody moans that all kids do nowadays is sit in on games consoles and computers and these kids are making the effort to go out and get some exercise, We were all kids once, I played in the street when I was young and never got into trouble, People nowadays are so miserable and grumpy,
Please let the kids play football as llong as they not damaging anything then let them be!!!
## Nonny Mouse ##
says...
10:03am Fri 20 Jul 12
Dilligaf2010
says...
11:10am Fri 20 Jul 12
kaydensmummy wrote:"it doesnt matter if u live in a flat,house,bungalow whatsoever as long as those children have a roof over their head !!!"..........
JanetJ wrote:it doesnt matter if u live in a flat,house,bungalow whatsoever as long as those children have a roof over their head !!! im a mum to a 13 month old toddler and i live in a flat so should i not have a child because of where i live ummmmmmm no !!! get over yourself janetj your pathetic love
doggiedoggie wrote:You could also question why they have had children when they have nowhere appropriate for them to live
Dilligaf2010 wrote:they are not willing mmmmmmmmmmmm with the amount of dog poop in parks these days & the older kids with their dogs i would want my kids close to home i myself have seen drug deals but what is the point of saying anything because nothing gets done ! Dare i say about missing children that have been found dead because their parents let them out & some1 took them. This argument is going to be on going for a long time. 1 question why did the council put young family's in up stairs flats ?
doggiedoggie wrote:These kids have somewhere to play, but their parents aren't willing to take them there.
GTS kiddy wrote:well said i'm behind the parents 100% the children are asking for some where to play safley as a parent of 3 my children had no where to play when they were little it only takes 1 to spoil what they had.
For goodness sake you lot, everybody moans that all kids do nowadays is sit in on games consoles and computers and these kids are making the effort to go out and get some exercise, We were all kids once, I played in the street when I was young and never got into trouble, People nowadays are so miserable and grumpy,
Please let the kids play football as llong as they not damaging anything then let them be!!!
...........you've hit the nail on the head, absolutely no requirement for the provision of somewhere to play football on their doorstep.........sho
t yourself in the foot there :-)
doggiedoggie
says...
12:53pm Fri 20 Jul 12
Dilligaf2010 wrote:ALL I CAN SAY IS THIS IS GOING TO BE A LONG TIME TRYING TO SORT OUT. ENOUGH SAID FROM ME !
kaydensmummy wrote:"it doesnt matter if u live in a flat,house,bungalow whatsoever as long as those children have a roof over their head !!!"..........
JanetJ wrote:it doesnt matter if u live in a flat,house,bungalow whatsoever as long as those children have a roof over their head !!! im a mum to a 13 month old toddler and i live in a flat so should i not have a child because of where i live ummmmmmm no !!! get over yourself janetj your pathetic love
doggiedoggie wrote:You could also question why they have had children when they have nowhere appropriate for them to live
Dilligaf2010 wrote:they are not willing mmmmmmmmmmmm with the amount of dog poop in parks these days & the older kids with their dogs i would want my kids close to home i myself have seen drug deals but what is the point of saying anything because nothing gets done ! Dare i say about missing children that have been found dead because their parents let them out & some1 took them. This argument is going to be on going for a long time. 1 question why did the council put young family's in up stairs flats ?
doggiedoggie wrote:These kids have somewhere to play, but their parents aren't willing to take them there.
GTS kiddy wrote:well said i'm behind the parents 100% the children are asking for some where to play safley as a parent of 3 my children had no where to play when they were little it only takes 1 to spoil what they had.
For goodness sake you lot, everybody moans that all kids do nowadays is sit in on games consoles and computers and these kids are making the effort to go out and get some exercise, We were all kids once, I played in the street when I was young and never got into trouble, People nowadays are so miserable and grumpy,
Please let the kids play football as llong as they not damaging anything then let them be!!!
...........you've hit the nail on the head, absolutely no requirement for the provision of somewhere to play football on their doorstep.........sho
t yourself in the foot there :-)
doggiedoggie
says...
12:55pm Fri 20 Jul 12
doggiedoggie wrote:Better than that i think most people think children should be seen but not heard now that is PATHETIC give them a chance !
Dilligaf2010 wrote:ALL I CAN SAY IS THIS IS GOING TO BE A LONG TIME TRYING TO SORT OUT. ENOUGH SAID FROM ME !
kaydensmummy wrote:"it doesnt matter if u live in a flat,house,bungalow whatsoever as long as those children have a roof over their head !!!"..........
JanetJ wrote:it doesnt matter if u live in a flat,house,bungalow whatsoever as long as those children have a roof over their head !!! im a mum to a 13 month old toddler and i live in a flat so should i not have a child because of where i live ummmmmmm no !!! get over yourself janetj your pathetic love
doggiedoggie wrote:You could also question why they have had children when they have nowhere appropriate for them to live
Dilligaf2010 wrote:they are not willing mmmmmmmmmmmm with the amount of dog poop in parks these days & the older kids with their dogs i would want my kids close to home i myself have seen drug deals but what is the point of saying anything because nothing gets done ! Dare i say about missing children that have been found dead because their parents let them out & some1 took them. This argument is going to be on going for a long time. 1 question why did the council put young family's in up stairs flats ?
doggiedoggie wrote:These kids have somewhere to play, but their parents aren't willing to take them there.
GTS kiddy wrote:well said i'm behind the parents 100% the children are asking for some where to play safley as a parent of 3 my children had no where to play when they were little it only takes 1 to spoil what they had.
For goodness sake you lot, everybody moans that all kids do nowadays is sit in on games consoles and computers and these kids are making the effort to go out and get some exercise, We were all kids once, I played in the street when I was young and never got into trouble, People nowadays are so miserable and grumpy,
Please let the kids play football as llong as they not damaging anything then let them be!!!
...........you've hit the nail on the head, absolutely no requirement for the provision of somewhere to play football on their doorstep.........sho
t yourself in the foot there :-)
doggiedoggie
says...
12:55pm Fri 20 Jul 12
doggiedoggie wrote:Better than that i think most people think children should be seen but not heard now that is PATHETIC give them a chance !
Dilligaf2010 wrote:ALL I CAN SAY IS THIS IS GOING TO BE A LONG TIME TRYING TO SORT OUT. ENOUGH SAID FROM ME !
kaydensmummy wrote:"it doesnt matter if u live in a flat,house,bungalow whatsoever as long as those children have a roof over their head !!!"..........
JanetJ wrote:it doesnt matter if u live in a flat,house,bungalow whatsoever as long as those children have a roof over their head !!! im a mum to a 13 month old toddler and i live in a flat so should i not have a child because of where i live ummmmmmm no !!! get over yourself janetj your pathetic love
doggiedoggie wrote:You could also question why they have had children when they have nowhere appropriate for them to live
Dilligaf2010 wrote:they are not willing mmmmmmmmmmmm with the amount of dog poop in parks these days & the older kids with their dogs i would want my kids close to home i myself have seen drug deals but what is the point of saying anything because nothing gets done ! Dare i say about missing children that have been found dead because their parents let them out & some1 took them. This argument is going to be on going for a long time. 1 question why did the council put young family's in up stairs flats ?
doggiedoggie wrote:These kids have somewhere to play, but their parents aren't willing to take them there.
GTS kiddy wrote:well said i'm behind the parents 100% the children are asking for some where to play safley as a parent of 3 my children had no where to play when they were little it only takes 1 to spoil what they had.
For goodness sake you lot, everybody moans that all kids do nowadays is sit in on games consoles and computers and these kids are making the effort to go out and get some exercise, We were all kids once, I played in the street when I was young and never got into trouble, People nowadays are so miserable and grumpy,
Please let the kids play football as llong as they not damaging anything then let them be!!!
...........you've hit the nail on the head, absolutely no requirement for the provision of somewhere to play football on their doorstep.........sho
t yourself in the foot there :-)
kaydensmummy
says...
2:27pm Fri 20 Jul 12
famalam
says...
2:33pm Fri 20 Jul 12
It shouldnt be a families and children vs. old people thing. It should be a families, children and old people vs. the council thing! Its the council who has failed to maintain safe parks or gardens, and so they are at fault. I feel sorry for the old people being disturbed by kids playing football. But more sorry for the kids who can't play football outside and their families.
norwood-clark2010
says...
2:48pm Fri 20 Jul 12
norwood-clark2010
says...
2:50pm Fri 20 Jul 12
A34North
says...
3:11pm Fri 20 Jul 12
famalam wrote:Yes that dreadful council who give out housing benefit to all those selfish people who expect more, more, more, in their me, me, me world. Why if it wasn't for them we could have elderly people homes, care workers and park wardens where the kids would be safe from those horrible nasty people and fouling dogs.
Got to remember that the tiny number of people commenting on this article so negatively isn't the whole public. I'd be surprised if most people didn't agree with you parents actually.
It shouldnt be a families and children vs. old people thing. It should be a families, children and old people vs. the council thing! Its the council who has failed to maintain safe parks or gardens, and so they are at fault. I feel sorry for the old people being disturbed by kids playing football. But more sorry for the kids who can't play football outside and their families.
You must be pleased this government is hoping to crack down on these people. Allegedly there are some people who think its no more than a form of prostitution; they get the pleasure and we all have to pay for it.
Doctor69
says...
3:33pm Fri 20 Jul 12
norwood-clark2010 wrote:You cannot expect to be taken seriously when you misspeal 'OF'.
it was ok bk in the days when we was kids to go to the park but now u have got perverts around the kids should be able to play on the grass end off
Doctor69
says...
3:34pm Fri 20 Jul 12
A34North wrote:Of course people who have children they can't afford to home should be given exactly what they demand! We can all go to work to pay for it too!
famalam wrote:Yes that dreadful council who give out housing benefit to all those selfish people who expect more, more, more, in their me, me, me world. Why if it wasn't for them we could have elderly people homes, care workers and park wardens where the kids would be safe from those horrible nasty people and fouling dogs.
Got to remember that the tiny number of people commenting on this article so negatively isn't the whole public. I'd be surprised if most people didn't agree with you parents actually.
It shouldnt be a families and children vs. old people thing. It should be a families, children and old people vs. the council thing! Its the council who has failed to maintain safe parks or gardens, and so they are at fault. I feel sorry for the old people being disturbed by kids playing football. But more sorry for the kids who can't play football outside and their families.
You must be pleased this government is hoping to crack down on these people. Allegedly there are some people who think its no more than a form of prostitution; they get the pleasure and we all have to pay for it.
Doctor69
says...
3:36pm Fri 20 Jul 12
Doctor69 wrote:Hands up - *misspell - that’s embarrassing!
norwood-clark2010 wrote:You cannot expect to be taken seriously when you misspeal 'OF'.
it was ok bk in the days when we was kids to go to the park but now u have got perverts around the kids should be able to play on the grass end off
Doctor69
says...
3:37pm Fri 20 Jul 12
kaydensmummy wrote:Don't get your own way, become abusive.....What a surprise.
how have i shot myself in the foot there u dumb **** !!! i quoted on what janetj said about why have kids if havent got suitable accomodation !!!! read my comment again u fool now dont bother replying your boring me now
Dilligaf2010
says...
3:48pm Fri 20 Jul 12
norwood-clark2010 wrote:Oh yes, back in the days when we WERE kids, there were no such thing as perverts, try telling that to the parents of Genette Tate who disappeared in 1978, and there have been plenty of other cases too.
it was ok bk in the days when we was kids to go to the park but now u have got perverts around the kids should be able to play on the grass end off
I think there were more cases of child abduction in the 60's & 70's than there are now, the only one in recent times that springs to mind was Madeleine McCann, and that wasn't even in the UK.
People are using this as an excuse as though it happens every day, on every street in the country, yes it's happened, and it's a heinous crime, but I don't think I've heard of an incident where one child has been abducted from a crowd, certainly not from a park overlooked by loads of houses.
Dilligaf2010
says...
4:01pm Fri 20 Jul 12
kaydensmummy wrote:When you start college, you should certainly investigate the possibility of learning grammar, and spelling.
how have i shot myself in the foot there u dumb **** !!! i quoted on what janetj said about why have kids if havent got suitable accomodation !!!! read my comment again u fool now dont bother replying your boring me now
I will continue to post replies until I see an adequate reason for parents not accompanying their children to the park, and why they should be allowed to play on a patch of grass, which is obviously upsetting some neighbours.
I think what this is a case of is, kids being sent out to play, because parents are too busy smoking, drinking & watching TV, so don't want to be disturbed.
As for calling me dumb, you stated that the most important thing was kids having a roof over their head, which is what the council have provided, they aren't obliged to provide a patch of land on people's doorsteps for kids to play football on.
Let's just add a little perspective, when my parents got married, in 1960, my Father was in the RAF, their accommodation was a caravan, because that's all that was available, and they had to pay for that.
Doctor69
says...
4:03pm Fri 20 Jul 12
Dilligaf2010 wrote:To be fair, it is a risk with children and abductions or other bad things happening to them. BUT getting up in the morning and stepping out of the house is also a risk.
norwood-clark2010 wrote:Oh yes, back in the days when we WERE kids, there were no such thing as perverts, try telling that to the parents of Genette Tate who disappeared in 1978, and there have been plenty of other cases too.
it was ok bk in the days when we was kids to go to the park but now u have got perverts around the kids should be able to play on the grass end off
I think there were more cases of child abduction in the 60's & 70's than there are now, the only one in recent times that springs to mind was Madeleine McCann, and that wasn't even in the UK.
People are using this as an excuse as though it happens every day, on every street in the country, yes it's happened, and it's a heinous crime, but I don't think I've heard of an incident where one child has been abducted from a crowd, certainly not from a park overlooked by loads of houses.
A sensible approach needs to be taken, and if the parents deem a park or other public place to risky, they need to supervise.
It still seems to me, that the parents in this case want everything doing for them and all the facilities being provided on their doorsteps.
As I mentioned earlier, I don’t have children...but I guess if you have kids, then you have to put yourself out to accommodate their needs.
If the park is as bad as the local families are saying, then that should be the topic of this article, and it would have gained a far more positive response than this has.
Dilligaf2010
says...
4:05pm Fri 20 Jul 12
Dilligaf2010
says...
4:09pm Fri 20 Jul 12
GTS kiddy wrote:"Maybe the councils should hire a security guard for all parks now so the younger kids can go there safely".........
doggiedoggie wrote:-18 for my original post. you people are all so miserable and grumpy.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:they are not willing mmmmmmmmmmmm with the amount of dog poop in parks these days & the older kids with their dogs i would want my kids close to home i myself have seen drug deals but what is the point of saying anything because nothing gets done ! Dare i say about missing children that have been found dead because their parents let them out & some1 took them. This argument is going to be on going for a long time. 1 question why did the council put young family's in up stairs flats ?
doggiedoggie wrote:These kids have somewhere to play, but their parents aren't willing to take them there.
GTS kiddy wrote:well said i'm behind the parents 100% the children are asking for some where to play safley as a parent of 3 my children had no where to play when they were little it only takes 1 to spoil what they had.
For goodness sake you lot, everybody moans that all kids do nowadays is sit in on games consoles and computers and these kids are making the effort to go out and get some exercise, We were all kids once, I played in the street when I was young and never got into trouble, People nowadays are so miserable and grumpy,
Please let the kids play football as llong as they not damaging anything then let them be!!!
I bet you have all forgotten you were young once and needed somewhere to play!!
I feel sorry for kids nowadays. Cos they not allowed to do this not allowed to do that.
We have kids playing footy in our street a few people moan. But they forget their kids did it when they were younger! Maybe the councils should hire a security guard for all parks now so the younger kids can go there safely.
Also. If you have taken your 2 or 3 year old to the swings would u want someone in there kicking a football about. ??
People nowadays are so miserable and selfish!!
..........you are joking, surely?
Why should the council provide a security guard to do something that parents can do, are you living on cloud cuckoo land?
Bon Rurgundy
says...
7:29pm Fri 20 Jul 12
Dilligaf2010
says...
7:45pm Fri 20 Jul 12
Bon Rurgundy wrote:Totally agree, I'm dumbstruck when I see families on TV being interviewed about benefit changes, saying they'll have to choose between eating, and buying new shoes for the kids, whilst sat on a leather sofa, with a large LCD TV, Satellite Box, and games console in the background.
I am absolutely staggered by some people's sense of entitlement...
People want, and expect, too much, although this of course is about a patch of communal garden.
A34North
says...
7:48pm Fri 20 Jul 12
BenkiuGuasu
says...
7:27pm Sat 21 Jul 12
simplicissimus
says...
8:29pm Sat 21 Jul 12
We should support bans, which protect the greater common good, and encourage such games on grassed areas away from close proximity to homes, where the thudding is less noticeable.
Well done to those who have restricted ball games in areas that are less fit, and may the ban be rolled out across the City!
Bon Rurgundy
says...
8:45pm Sat 21 Jul 12
BenkiuGuasu wrote:I think the point is that they can play "ball" - if they walk 489ft to the local park.
Let the kids play ball. Complaining residents need to get a life.
I'm sure the residents have a life, a considerably more quiet one now.
Whopper w/o Pickle Cornmarket St
says...
5:09am Sun 22 Jul 12
simplicissimus wrote:I agree, and can this ban be imposed on our "little darlings" from both Universities who's anti-social vandalism, nuisance and screaming at the top of their voices on their way home after a couple of shandies, causes far more damage to peoples property and sleep than a few children playing football in the street ever will. So I suggest a ban on alcohol sales to all students outside of their own college bar, and may that also be rolled out across the city, Ms Simples.
Ball games on residential streets, pavements, walls, &c, are often noisy and an antisocial nuisance. Players often lose control and property and vehicles are likely to be hit and even damaged.
We should support bans, which protect the greater common good, and encourage such games on grassed areas away from close proximity to homes, where the thudding is less noticeable.
Well done to those who have restricted ball games in areas that are less fit, and may the ban be rolled out across the City!
Whopper w/o Pickle Cornmarket St
says...
5:21am Sun 22 Jul 12
Dilligaf2010 wrote:It is not a security guard that is needed. It is for TVP to do their job. There have been accusations made here that are very serious, yet no comment from TVP, either they are happy for the park to be used for purposes other than the specified ones, or the parents on here are lying. I see signs up all over Oxford saying that Oxford City Council and TVP are monitoring this area for signs of Illegal Drugs, Alcohol, and activity of a Sexual Nature, so obviously they are just bogus and none of our publicly shared areas are actually made safe for all to use. As regards to this story I do not know the park in question, but I know children. And they will happily walk and run miles for an area to play a decent game of football (and I hope in the summer Cricket) so for this park to be off bounds there must be a real reason. So instead of all the slagging off, how about TVP doing the rounds for a few evenings and seeing if the park is in fact safe or not.
GTS kiddy wrote:"Maybe the councils should hire a security guard for all parks now so the younger kids can go there safely".........
doggiedoggie wrote:-18 for my original post. you people are all so miserable and grumpy.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:they are not willing mmmmmmmmmmmm with the amount of dog poop in parks these days & the older kids with their dogs i would want my kids close to home i myself have seen drug deals but what is the point of saying anything because nothing gets done ! Dare i say about missing children that have been found dead because their parents let them out & some1 took them. This argument is going to be on going for a long time. 1 question why did the council put young family's in up stairs flats ?
doggiedoggie wrote:These kids have somewhere to play, but their parents aren't willing to take them there.
GTS kiddy wrote:well said i'm behind the parents 100% the children are asking for some where to play safley as a parent of 3 my children had no where to play when they were little it only takes 1 to spoil what they had.
For goodness sake you lot, everybody moans that all kids do nowadays is sit in on games consoles and computers and these kids are making the effort to go out and get some exercise, We were all kids once, I played in the street when I was young and never got into trouble, People nowadays are so miserable and grumpy,
Please let the kids play football as llong as they not damaging anything then let them be!!!
I bet you have all forgotten you were young once and needed somewhere to play!!
I feel sorry for kids nowadays. Cos they not allowed to do this not allowed to do that.
We have kids playing footy in our street a few people moan. But they forget their kids did it when they were younger! Maybe the councils should hire a security guard for all parks now so the younger kids can go there safely.
Also. If you have taken your 2 or 3 year old to the swings would u want someone in there kicking a football about. ??
People nowadays are so miserable and selfish!!
..........you are joking, surely?
Why should the council provide a security guard to do something that parents can do, are you living on cloud cuckoo land?
A34North
says...
9:37am Sun 22 Jul 12
Whopper w/o Pickle Cornmarket St wrote:Oh please, have you not read the whole article and comments? We moved on from drugs and child molesters many comments ago we are at present on dog crap as the excuse.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:It is not a security guard that is needed. It is for TVP to do their job. There have been accusations made here that are very serious, yet no comment from TVP, either they are happy for the park to be used for purposes other than the specified ones, or the parents on here are lying. I see signs up all over Oxford saying that Oxford City Council and TVP are monitoring this area for signs of Illegal Drugs, Alcohol, and activity of a Sexual Nature, so obviously they are just bogus and none of our publicly shared areas are actually made safe for all to use. As regards to this story I do not know the park in question, but I know children. And they will happily walk and run miles for an area to play a decent game of football (and I hope in the summer Cricket) so for this park to be off bounds there must be a real reason. So instead of all the slagging off, how about TVP doing the rounds for a few evenings and seeing if the park is in fact safe or not.
GTS kiddy wrote:"Maybe the councils should hire a security guard for all parks now so the younger kids can go there safely".........
doggiedoggie wrote:-18 for my original post. you people are all so miserable and grumpy.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:they are not willing mmmmmmmmmmmm with the amount of dog poop in parks these days & the older kids with their dogs i would want my kids close to home i myself have seen drug deals but what is the point of saying anything because nothing gets done ! Dare i say about missing children that have been found dead because their parents let them out & some1 took them. This argument is going to be on going for a long time. 1 question why did the council put young family's in up stairs flats ?
doggiedoggie wrote:These kids have somewhere to play, but their parents aren't willing to take them there.
GTS kiddy wrote:well said i'm behind the parents 100% the children are asking for some where to play safley as a parent of 3 my children had no where to play when they were little it only takes 1 to spoil what they had.
For goodness sake you lot, everybody moans that all kids do nowadays is sit in on games consoles and computers and these kids are making the effort to go out and get some exercise, We were all kids once, I played in the street when I was young and never got into trouble, People nowadays are so miserable and grumpy,
Please let the kids play football as llong as they not damaging anything then let them be!!!
I bet you have all forgotten you were young once and needed somewhere to play!!
I feel sorry for kids nowadays. Cos they not allowed to do this not allowed to do that.
We have kids playing footy in our street a few people moan. But they forget their kids did it when they were younger! Maybe the councils should hire a security guard for all parks now so the younger kids can go there safely.
Also. If you have taken your 2 or 3 year old to the swings would u want someone in there kicking a football about. ??
People nowadays are so miserable and selfish!!
..........you are joking, surely?
Why should the council provide a security guard to do something that parents can do, are you living on cloud cuckoo land?
Bon Rurgundy
says...
5:31pm Sun 22 Jul 12
A34North wrote:Someone needs to tell the twenty or so kids I have seen in this park when driving past in the last couple of days that it is so unsafe. There was a marked lack of nonces and drug dealers as well...
Whopper w/o Pickle Cornmarket St wrote:Oh please, have you not read the whole article and comments? We moved on from drugs and child molesters many comments ago we are at present on dog crap as the excuse.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:It is not a security guard that is needed. It is for TVP to do their job. There have been accusations made here that are very serious, yet no comment from TVP, either they are happy for the park to be used for purposes other than the specified ones, or the parents on here are lying. I see signs up all over Oxford saying that Oxford City Council and TVP are monitoring this area for signs of Illegal Drugs, Alcohol, and activity of a Sexual Nature, so obviously they are just bogus and none of our publicly shared areas are actually made safe for all to use. As regards to this story I do not know the park in question, but I know children. And they will happily walk and run miles for an area to play a decent game of football (and I hope in the summer Cricket) so for this park to be off bounds there must be a real reason. So instead of all the slagging off, how about TVP doing the rounds for a few evenings and seeing if the park is in fact safe or not.
GTS kiddy wrote:"Maybe the councils should hire a security guard for all parks now so the younger kids can go there safely".........
doggiedoggie wrote:-18 for my original post. you people are all so miserable and grumpy.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:they are not willing mmmmmmmmmmmm with the amount of dog poop in parks these days & the older kids with their dogs i would want my kids close to home i myself have seen drug deals but what is the point of saying anything because nothing gets done ! Dare i say about missing children that have been found dead because their parents let them out & some1 took them. This argument is going to be on going for a long time. 1 question why did the council put young family's in up stairs flats ?
doggiedoggie wrote:These kids have somewhere to play, but their parents aren't willing to take them there.
GTS kiddy wrote:well said i'm behind the parents 100% the children are asking for some where to play safley as a parent of 3 my children had no where to play when they were little it only takes 1 to spoil what they had.
For goodness sake you lot, everybody moans that all kids do nowadays is sit in on games consoles and computers and these kids are making the effort to go out and get some exercise, We were all kids once, I played in the street when I was young and never got into trouble, People nowadays are so miserable and grumpy,
Please let the kids play football as llong as they not damaging anything then let them be!!!
I bet you have all forgotten you were young once and needed somewhere to play!!
I feel sorry for kids nowadays. Cos they not allowed to do this not allowed to do that.
We have kids playing footy in our street a few people moan. But they forget their kids did it when they were younger! Maybe the councils should hire a security guard for all parks now so the younger kids can go there safely.
Also. If you have taken your 2 or 3 year old to the swings would u want someone in there kicking a football about. ??
People nowadays are so miserable and selfish!!
..........you are joking, surely?
Why should the council provide a security guard to do something that parents can do, are you living on cloud cuckoo land?
John Lamb
says...
5:54pm Sun 22 Jul 12
If the park is full of druggies and weirdos, as stated, then these same groups must at some point walk past or near these unsupervised children. If you live in the jungle you don't let your offspring out of your sight.
I suggest all the the rest of us chip together and pay for football sessions for all these kids so there mums can view Jeremy Kyle and Loose Women uninterrupted.
Or we could ignore them and hope they become responsible parents.
After reading the badly spelt gibberish on here, I just pity the kids. They have poor role models who think their hooman rights outweigh everybody else's. They don't.
Also, do these parents with medical problems not have friends/relatives who can take these sprogs out for a kickabout?
Or is it, as I suspect, they just want a quiet life and out of sight is out of mind?
A34North
says...
9:41pm Sun 22 Jul 12
John Lamb wrote:John Lamb, you have a very valid point. Is there a response by these hard done by people?
This little piece of land is ok for very young children to play on unsupervised by their otherwise occupied parent/parents, even though it is blighting the lives of the other older tenants? Did none of these bleating parents think to make sure they had suitable accommodation before dropping sprog after sprog?
If the park is full of druggies and weirdos, as stated, then these same groups must at some point walk past or near these unsupervised children. If you live in the jungle you don't let your offspring out of your sight.
I suggest all the the rest of us chip together and pay for football sessions for all these kids so there mums can view Jeremy Kyle and Loose Women uninterrupted.
Or we could ignore them and hope they become responsible parents.
After reading the badly spelt gibberish on here, I just pity the kids. They have poor role models who think their hooman rights outweigh everybody else's. They don't.
Also, do these parents with medical problems not have friends/relatives who can take these sprogs out for a kickabout?
Or is it, as I suspect, they just want a quiet life and out of sight is out of mind?
John Lamb
says...
9:43am Mon 23 Jul 12
Oops
Dilligaf2010
says...
10:13am Mon 23 Jul 12
John Lamb wrote:LOL ;-)
*their
Oops
Dilligaf2010
says...
10:16am Mon 23 Jul 12
A34North wrote:I doubt it very much, they've dug themselves a hole, so deep, that they can't get out of to reach their computers.
John Lamb wrote:John Lamb, you have a very valid point. Is there a response by these hard done by people?
This little piece of land is ok for very young children to play on unsupervised by their otherwise occupied parent/parents, even though it is blighting the lives of the other older tenants? Did none of these bleating parents think to make sure they had suitable accommodation before dropping sprog after sprog?
If the park is full of druggies and weirdos, as stated, then these same groups must at some point walk past or near these unsupervised children. If you live in the jungle you don't let your offspring out of your sight.
I suggest all the the rest of us chip together and pay for football sessions for all these kids so there mums can view Jeremy Kyle and Loose Women uninterrupted.
Or we could ignore them and hope they become responsible parents.
After reading the badly spelt gibberish on here, I just pity the kids. They have poor role models who think their hooman rights outweigh everybody else's. They don't.
Also, do these parents with medical problems not have friends/relatives who can take these sprogs out for a kickabout?
Or is it, as I suspect, they just want a quiet life and out of sight is out of mind?
A34North
says...
10:46am Mon 23 Jul 12
Dilligaf2010 wrote:Hey Dilly, maybe they have taken them to the park?
A34North wrote:I doubt it very much, they've dug themselves a hole, so deep, that they can't get out of to reach their computers.
John Lamb wrote:John Lamb, you have a very valid point. Is there a response by these hard done by people?
This little piece of land is ok for very young children to play on unsupervised by their otherwise occupied parent/parents, even though it is blighting the lives of the other older tenants? Did none of these bleating parents think to make sure they had suitable accommodation before dropping sprog after sprog?
If the park is full of druggies and weirdos, as stated, then these same groups must at some point walk past or near these unsupervised children. If you live in the jungle you don't let your offspring out of your sight.
I suggest all the the rest of us chip together and pay for football sessions for all these kids so there mums can view Jeremy Kyle and Loose Women uninterrupted.
Or we could ignore them and hope they become responsible parents.
After reading the badly spelt gibberish on here, I just pity the kids. They have poor role models who think their hooman rights outweigh everybody else's. They don't.
Also, do these parents with medical problems not have friends/relatives who can take these sprogs out for a kickabout?
Or is it, as I suspect, they just want a quiet life and out of sight is out of mind?
Dilligaf2010
says...
12:11pm Mon 23 Jul 12
A34North wrote:I'll have a pint of what you're drinking ;-)
Dilligaf2010 wrote:Hey Dilly, maybe they have taken them to the park?
A34North wrote:I doubt it very much, they've dug themselves a hole, so deep, that they can't get out of to reach their computers.
John Lamb wrote:John Lamb, you have a very valid point. Is there a response by these hard done by people?
This little piece of land is ok for very young children to play on unsupervised by their otherwise occupied parent/parents, even though it is blighting the lives of the other older tenants? Did none of these bleating parents think to make sure they had suitable accommodation before dropping sprog after sprog?
If the park is full of druggies and weirdos, as stated, then these same groups must at some point walk past or near these unsupervised children. If you live in the jungle you don't let your offspring out of your sight.
I suggest all the the rest of us chip together and pay for football sessions for all these kids so there mums can view Jeremy Kyle and Loose Women uninterrupted.
Or we could ignore them and hope they become responsible parents.
After reading the badly spelt gibberish on here, I just pity the kids. They have poor role models who think their hooman rights outweigh everybody else's. They don't.
Also, do these parents with medical problems not have friends/relatives who can take these sprogs out for a kickabout?
Or is it, as I suspect, they just want a quiet life and out of sight is out of mind?
famalam
says...
12:48pm Mon 23 Jul 12
## Nonny Mouse ##
says...
2:48pm Mon 23 Jul 12
Oh, and sorry to be the one to break it to you, but the likelihood of someone wanting to have sex/abduct any of your children is minuscule. Do you honestly think that there is more of it going on (proportionally) than when you were children? Per-lease.
A34North
says...
3:16pm Mon 23 Jul 12
famalam wrote:Do you partake of the Daily Mail perchance?
John Lamb does not have a valid point. His main point as i see it is that the grass they're playing football on now will have the same people going past it who make the park unsuitable for kids. This is wrong. It is wrong because the point is not that there will be unsavoury types walking past, but that drug deals happen in sight of the kids. Drug dealers may walk past the grass the kids play football on, but then that's inevitable to some extent wherever you live, cos there's loads of dealers... The point is that people don't actually deal in front of where the kids play football at the moment. The same applies with perverts/paedos. Over to you.
I despair that you think that John Lamb does not have many valid points within his recent comment.
Look, lets go through this from the top. For generations people young and old have not tolerated the thud, thud, thud of a ball. Believe it or not it is rather anti social.
Some mothers then think they will get support by taking their oh so hard done by children into the public eye through this newspaper and blame the nearby aged people for complaining. Unfortunately, they did not get the response they thought they would get so the blame culture takes over. First we had the possibility the children would be attacked then came the drug dealers and the 'people who stare at the children', work and medical problems then surfaced to be followed by the eighteen month old child, next came the forfeit of responsibility as the 'parents had lives too'. Up to this point there was also the little snipes at posters who did not agree with the cause.
We then had a period of posting that seemed to dispel the threat of drug dealers and the like although we did have a little foray into respecting the children. I think we were all wondering if the parents were going to take the children to the park?
No, no, of course not, up pops dog muck and the possibility of the children touching it. The very park that is used by by footballers at the weekend. Teenagers using the park became the next no,no. Parents rights on safe places was raised and a little more abuse thrown in.
Right, who can we blame now, the council of course and of course we are all perverts. TVP were also blamed.
So, we have a piece of land that the parents want for their children to play football to the detriment of others in the area. The council made it a no ball game area of which there are many in the area. The park continues to be used by the community and yet these children are not encouraged to use the facility and from what has been posted here one could assume that the children are frightened to death of the outside world.
The ability to parent children to ensure their health, wealth and wellbeing and ensure their acceptability into society is a gift to parents.
GTS kiddy
says...
3:49pm Mon 23 Jul 12
Whopper w/o Pickle Cornmarket St wrote:obv i was joking yes.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:It is not a security guard that is needed. It is for TVP to do their job. There have been accusations made here that are very serious, yet no comment from TVP, either they are happy for the park to be used for purposes other than the specified ones, or the parents on here are lying. I see signs up all over Oxford saying that Oxford City Council and TVP are monitoring this area for signs of Illegal Drugs, Alcohol, and activity of a Sexual Nature, so obviously they are just bogus and none of our publicly shared areas are actually made safe for all to use. As regards to this story I do not know the park in question, but I know children. And they will happily walk and run miles for an area to play a decent game of football (and I hope in the summer Cricket) so for this park to be off bounds there must be a real reason. So instead of all the slagging off, how about TVP doing the rounds for a few evenings and seeing if the park is in fact safe or not.
GTS kiddy wrote:"Maybe the councils should hire a security guard for all parks now so the younger kids can go there safely".........
doggiedoggie wrote:-18 for my original post. you people are all so miserable and grumpy.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:they are not willing mmmmmmmmmmmm with the amount of dog poop in parks these days & the older kids with their dogs i would want my kids close to home i myself have seen drug deals but what is the point of saying anything because nothing gets done ! Dare i say about missing children that have been found dead because their parents let them out & some1 took them. This argument is going to be on going for a long time. 1 question why did the council put young family's in up stairs flats ?
doggiedoggie wrote:These kids have somewhere to play, but their parents aren't willing to take them there.
GTS kiddy wrote:well said i'm behind the parents 100% the children are asking for some where to play safley as a parent of 3 my children had no where to play when they were little it only takes 1 to spoil what they had.
For goodness sake you lot, everybody moans that all kids do nowadays is sit in on games consoles and computers and these kids are making the effort to go out and get some exercise, We were all kids once, I played in the street when I was young and never got into trouble, People nowadays are so miserable and grumpy,
Please let the kids play football as llong as they not damaging anything then let them be!!!
I bet you have all forgotten you were young once and needed somewhere to play!!
I feel sorry for kids nowadays. Cos they not allowed to do this not allowed to do that.
We have kids playing footy in our street a few people moan. But they forget their kids did it when they were younger! Maybe the councils should hire a security guard for all parks now so the younger kids can go there safely.
Also. If you have taken your 2 or 3 year old to the swings would u want someone in there kicking a football about. ??
People nowadays are so miserable and selfish!!
..........you are joking, surely?
Why should the council provide a security guard to do something that parents can do, are you living on cloud cuckoo land?
It is up to parents to keep an eye on their own children.
But I dont think at 10 years old parents should have to escort the children to the park because of drug dealers, etc.... and older kids and dog mess!!
also as I ws saying before if you have a younger child in the park would you want a couple of youngsters kicking a ball around? poor kids cant do anything right nowadays. give them a bit of green for playing footy a park with swings etc for the others. and for gods sake people stop being so negative and miserable. life is too short, not everyone is equal, just deal with it!!
John Lamb
says...
4:27pm Mon 23 Jul 12
famalam wrote:My main point, which you have totally missed, is that it is an individual parent's responsibility to care and protect their own children. People moan about a nanny state yet these feckless women are actually demanding that their offspring are allowed to annoy and irritate other members of their community because they cannot be bothered to interact with their own children.
John Lamb does not have a valid point. His main point as i see it is that the grass they're playing football on now will have the same people going past it who make the park unsuitable for kids. This is wrong. It is wrong because the point is not that there will be unsavoury types walking past, but that drug deals happen in sight of the kids. Drug dealers may walk past the grass the kids play football on, but then that's inevitable to some extent wherever you live, cos there's loads of dealers... The point is that people don't actually deal in front of where the kids play football at the moment. The same applies with perverts/paedos. Over to you.
Do these women think that the bad people stop at the park?
If the park is bad then the area will be bad. Do children know a drug deal is going down if one person passes another something?
Why not take your kids to the park and make a note of all the drug dealers and paedos and inform the police and make the park a safer place?
No...because this takes effort and a bit of community spirit which these whingers profess to have but don't actually possess.
Whilst they are playing football on this bit of grass do the mums watch from their windows and keep an eye on them? No...because it would mean missing a bit of telly.
I have several children, all of whom I have taken to the park.
I realise this has meant me having to get off my backside at regular intervals but that's part and parcel of being a parent. It has also helps me keep fit and well.
This the-world-owes-me-a-
living attitude is why we're in the state we are.
They're YOUR kids. If you can't get them to the designated place for legally playing football then form a group to make a rota and take it in turns. Don't expect anyone to think it ok to make old folk's lives a misery because of your laziness and absolute gall.
John Lamb
says...
4:31pm Mon 23 Jul 12
I also find the use of paedophiles to warrant laziness, totally inappropriate.
kaydensmummy
says...
4:38pm Mon 23 Jul 12
Dilligaf2010
says...
4:42pm Mon 23 Jul 12
GTS kiddy wrote:"poor kids cant do anything right nowadays. give them a bit of green for playing footy a park with swings etc for the others".........
Whopper w/o Pickle Cornmarket St wrote:obv i was joking yes.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:It is not a security guard that is needed. It is for TVP to do their job. There have been accusations made here that are very serious, yet no comment from TVP, either they are happy for the park to be used for purposes other than the specified ones, or the parents on here are lying. I see signs up all over Oxford saying that Oxford City Council and TVP are monitoring this area for signs of Illegal Drugs, Alcohol, and activity of a Sexual Nature, so obviously they are just bogus and none of our publicly shared areas are actually made safe for all to use. As regards to this story I do not know the park in question, but I know children. And they will happily walk and run miles for an area to play a decent game of football (and I hope in the summer Cricket) so for this park to be off bounds there must be a real reason. So instead of all the slagging off, how about TVP doing the rounds for a few evenings and seeing if the park is in fact safe or not.
GTS kiddy wrote:"Maybe the councils should hire a security guard for all parks now so the younger kids can go there safely".........
doggiedoggie wrote:-18 for my original post. you people are all so miserable and grumpy.
Dilligaf2010 wrote:they are not willing mmmmmmmmmmmm with the amount of dog poop in parks these days & the older kids with their dogs i would want my kids close to home i myself have seen drug deals but what is the point of saying anything because nothing gets done ! Dare i say about missing children that have been found dead because their parents let them out & some1 took them. This argument is going to be on going for a long time. 1 question why did the council put young family's in up stairs flats ?
doggiedoggie wrote:These kids have somewhere to play, but their parents aren't willing to take them there.
GTS kiddy wrote:well said i'm behind the parents 100% the children are asking for some where to play safley as a parent of 3 my children had no where to play when they were little it only takes 1 to spoil what they had.
For goodness sake you lot, everybody moans that all kids do nowadays is sit in on games consoles and computers and these kids are making the effort to go out and get some exercise, We were all kids once, I played in the street when I was young and never got into trouble, People nowadays are so miserable and grumpy,
Please let the kids play football as llong as they not damaging anything then let them be!!!
I bet you have all forgotten you were young once and needed somewhere to play!!
I feel sorry for kids nowadays. Cos they not allowed to do this not allowed to do that.
We have kids playing footy in our street a few people moan. But they forget their kids did it when they were younger! Maybe the councils should hire a security guard for all parks now so the younger kids can go there safely.
Also. If you have taken your 2 or 3 year old to the swings would u want someone in there kicking a football about. ??
People nowadays are so miserable and selfish!!
..........you are joking, surely?
Why should the council provide a security guard to do something that parents can do, are you living on cloud cuckoo land?
It is up to parents to keep an eye on their own children.
But I dont think at 10 years old parents should have to escort the children to the park because of drug dealers, etc.... and older kids and dog mess!!
also as I ws saying before if you have a younger child in the park would you want a couple of youngsters kicking a ball around? poor kids cant do anything right nowadays. give them a bit of green for playing footy a park with swings etc for the others. and for gods sake people stop being so negative and miserable. life is too short, not everyone is equal, just deal with it!!
.........the park is a fairly large area, plenty of room to kick a ball about, without having to go near the swings etc.
I agree, life's too short, but it's even shorter for parents that would rather sit on their arses watching TV and drinking, than taking their kids out to play football.
I agree, not everyone is equal, but these parents seem to think they're more equal than others, and therefore entitled to more.
Dilligaf2010
says...
4:50pm Mon 23 Jul 12
kaydensmummy wrote:Ah, so this article is nothing to do with kids not being able to play football, the parents want the garden, which is there, but has never been theirs, back.
my last say on the matter because quite frankly i have better things to do but what your actually missing out is that its not the land the parents want they want the garden back !!!!!
How stupid of us all, I don't know how I managed to get it wrong, I've got an IQ of 145 (Top 1% of the country), and I was convinced the argument was about a ban on ball games.
Dilligaf2010
says...
5:37pm Mon 23 Jul 12
Captain J
says...
5:43pm Mon 23 Jul 12
Dilligaf, I require immediate proof of your claimed IQ of 145. From your posts I'd say your IQ was 142 TOPS.
simplicissimus
says...
6:29pm Mon 23 Jul 12
noodles78 wrote:Were you a victim of Labour's "new learning", noodles78? You tend to major on your "rights", rather than on what always should come first, ie our familial and social obligations. Initially, children should always, generally and by default, respect adults.
have some respect for the elderly!!!!! dont make me laugh, u tell me y these kids should show respect to someone who opens their door and says stop kickin ur f****ng football in my garden and im phonin the f****ng council about u, answer that cos when i was younger i was taught to show respect to people who gave u respect!
Pupils who mistakenly think that adults and even their teachers need to earn their (the children's) respect 1st, are living in the topsy-turvy world of Leftist "child-centred" teacher training dogma, which is yet another reason why much of the comprehensive system is failing, why our schools are not working as well as they could, and why increasingly the tail wags the dog.
The result is often a lack of discipline and of respect for seniority, bad education, poor manners, ill-natured selfishness, or worse.
## Nonny Mouse ##
says...
8:55am Tue 24 Jul 12
Nail on head.
noodles78
says...
12:06am Mon 6 Aug 12
Simplizissimus
says...
8:14am Mon 6 Aug 12
Dilligaf2010
says...
9:50am Mon 6 Aug 12
.........broken glass everywhere, wow that must've taken somebody hours, and I'd love to know how they got all the glass there, someone must've seen the truck that delivered it.
........how can you be so sure it was human excrement under the slide. it could've been a large dog's.
Lord Palmerstone says...
7:27am Tue 17 Jul 12