News RSS Feed


Shotgun brandished at dog walkers

A FARMER’S brandishing of a shotgun in front of two dog walkers was no different to “using a shovel for gardening”, his barrister claimed.

Timothy Hook was sentenced at Oxford Crown Court for a common assault on dog-walker Gary Somerville.

Nigel Fryer, defending, said his client had not intended to scare Mr Somerville and his partner Mr Cripps when he produced the weapon.

He said: “The reality here is that whilst a shotgun was involved on a limited basis, to those who are not involved in the farming community and to someone who has no knowledge of guns the production of such a weapon can seem threatening and frightening, but of course for Mr Hook, being a farmer, it’s a tool of his trade — no more, no less.

“It’s the same as getting a shovel out.”

Mr Somerville and Mr Cripps were walking their two West Highland terriers and one red setter on land owned by the GJ Hook and Son dairy farm in Cote, near Bampton, on May 18.

The court was told the route was often used by the pair, who mistakenly thought it was a public right of way.

Prosecutor Jonathan Stone said 30-year-old Hook pulled over in a Land Rover and shouted: “What the **** are you doing on my land?”

Mr Stone said Mr Somerville apologised and told the farmer they would leave, but Hook said: “If I catch you on my land again I will take you and your dogs out” before removing a shotgun in its case from the vehicle.

Hook, whose barrister described the incident as a “clash of cultures”, denied using a firearm with intent to cause fear but admitted a lesser charge of common assault. He was given a 12-month conditional discharge with £475 costs.

Comments(55)

the wizard says...
11:19am Fri 20 Jan 12

While nobody can condone the threat of a firearm being used, far too many people take it for granted that they can walk and wander anywhere.
Farmers, although not my favourite species, have enough worries over spread of disease across their land and contamination of crops and the like.
Dog mess is a constant cause of annoyance throughout society. These two walkers should have took the lesson on board, but no, they go and report it as if they were in the right to be there. I hope the farmer erects plenty of signs and further deterrents to keep them out in the future, after all, he was only protecting what is rightfully his to start with. Had they caught an infection no doubt they would be suing him, when they had no right to be there in the first place, and Cameron says you can defend what is yours, hmmmmmm.

Darkforbid says...
11:21am Fri 20 Jan 12

Strangely, most would think getting a gun from your car... Is intent to use it

But obviously not under "UK rich landowner" law

Dilligaf2010 says...
11:29am Fri 20 Jan 12

A Farmer's brandishing of a shotgun in front of two dog walkers was no different to “using a shovel for gardening”, his barrister claimed.......
........what planet is this Barrister from? Cloud Cuckoo-Land?
I must've missed something, last time I bought a shovel I didn't have to produce a license, anybody else had to?

Darkforbid says...
12:03pm Fri 20 Jan 12

Of course you do!!

Its part of the garden tools licensing act (1758)

Your_Kidding says...
12:10pm Fri 20 Jan 12

So will he now loose his shotgun licence for having a conviction for assault ?

Dilligaf2010 says...
12:25pm Fri 20 Jan 12

Your_Kidding wrote:
So will he now loose his shotgun licence for having a conviction for assault ?
Doubt it, but he'll probably get a mention in the Queen's Birthday Honours list.

Straight Six says...
1:32pm Fri 20 Jan 12

Jeesh will you lot get a life....Bigger issues out there right now me thinks. And removing a sheathed gun from a vehicle constitutes intent to use use it? Idiot. Thank goodness the Judge used his brain.

Straight Six says...
1:33pm Fri 20 Jan 12

Idiots. Thank goodness the Judge used his brain.

Straight Six says...
1:34pm Fri 20 Jan 12

Ooops.....

Dilligaf2010 says...
1:37pm Fri 20 Jan 12

Straight Six wrote:
Idiots. Thank goodness the Judge used his brain.
Not like you then :P

Your_Kidding says...
1:46pm Fri 20 Jan 12

Straight Six wrote:
Jeesh will you lot get a life....Bigger issues out there right now me thinks. And removing a sheathed gun from a vehicle constitutes intent to use use it? Idiot. Thank goodness the Judge used his brain.
Issues so big you felt the need to tear yourself away from them to add your three comments.

King Joke says...
2:05pm Fri 20 Jan 12

A sheathed gun is still a gun, ie a thing designed to kill people with. Waving one around at people who have annoyed you is not the way people in a civilised society carry on.

If someone walked across my front garden and I went back to the kitched to fetch a knife to wave at them, I'd quite rightly have the book thrown at me. Farmers should be no different.

Dilligaf2010 says...
3:13pm Fri 20 Jan 12

King Joke wrote:
A sheathed gun is still a gun, ie a thing designed to kill people with. Waving one around at people who have annoyed you is not the way people in a civilised society carry on.

If someone walked across my front garden and I went back to the kitched to fetch a knife to wave at them, I'd quite rightly have the book thrown at me. Farmers should be no different.
Ah, but according to the Barrister, you'd be better off keeping a shovel in your cutlery drawer :P

Darkforbid says...
3:44pm Fri 20 Jan 12

And in most 'gun legal' countries the simple act of using one in a threatening manner, gives you the right to respond with extreme force...

If the dog walkers in this story had hit him with something heavy, bet they'd be looking at jail time...

Lord Palmerstone says...
4:21pm Fri 20 Jan 12

If he'd taken a shovel out of his motor I would have expected him to hit me with it. The least he should have got was Probation with Anger Mangement but realistically he may need to see a shrink if he's unable to control himself, like this. And no, he shouldn't keep his shotgun licence, even if only for fear of self-harm.

King Joke says...
4:55pm Fri 20 Jan 12

Some sense from one of our Lords, but what of McVey? Why is he still keeping his counsel?

iklhik says...
7:09pm Fri 20 Jan 12

King Joke wrote:
A sheathed gun is still a gun, ie a thing designed to kill people with. Waving one around at people who have annoyed you is not the way people in a civilised society carry on.

If someone walked across my front garden and I went back to the kitched to fetch a knife to wave at them, I'd quite rightly have the book thrown at me. Farmers should be no different.
Only this is a shotgun, not a handgun. Hardly the tool of choice for criminals, and no more designed to kill people than your kitchen knives or your car - all are capable, but designed for other purposes.

Darkforbid says...
7:34pm Fri 20 Jan 12

┄Hardly the tool of choice
for criminals┄

?? In the UK it is!!

You may have to shorten it first, hence "sawnoff" the most common weapon used in armed robberies, in the country

King Joke says...
9:07pm Fri 20 Jan 12

THat's what's known as nit-picking. If someone is swearing at me, telling me to get off his land, and retrieving a firearm from his vehicle, I am in no way going to be reassured by the fact it was designed for killing pheasants not people. I will most likely be in fear of serious injury, or my life.

Instilling the fear of imminent demise into someone who has wronged you is the action of a thuggish hooligan, and the law should deal with this chap accordingly.

The Big Issue says...
10:23pm Fri 20 Jan 12

Congratulations Farmer Hook for using three great farmer stereotypes; Gets out of his LAND ROVER, brandishing a SHOTGUN, and asks "What are you doing on MY LAAAAANNNND?"

Did he say oooh arrrgh aswell?

Darkforbid says...
11:38pm Fri 20 Jan 12

┄Did he say oooh arrrgh aswell?┄

Perhaps he thought it was an audition for Vis the movie...

LORD PETE MCVEY OX2 6EG says...
3:30am Sat 21 Jan 12

Your_Kidding wrote:
So will he now loose his shotgun licence for having a conviction for assault ?
One would assume that you would want his shotgun licence to be tightened, not as you state to be more LOOSE, or did you want him to LOSE his licence ?

LORD PETE MCVEY OX2 6EG says...
3:37am Sat 21 Jan 12

King Joke wrote:
Some sense from one of our Lords, but what of McVey? Why is he still keeping his counsel?
TBH, these plebs that seem to think that they can just use other peoples land for their own pleasures, are exactly the same ones that come running out of their houses if you even park your car 1 inch over their driveway effing and blinding about it being their property. They can't have it both ways, and the farmer was just warning them in a forceful way so that they would not trespass again. Typical Townies not understanding the ways of the country. But I was surprised at the judge giving such a harsh sentence, a conditional discharge would have been appropriate in this case.

LORD PETE MCVEY OX2 6EG says...
3:39am Sat 21 Jan 12

King Joke wrote:
Some sense from one of our Lords, but what of McVey? Why is he still keeping his counsel?
Had trouble getting a cab home mate, bl00dy students are back and took them all. Gave me an excuse for a couple of extra nitecaps.

Darkforbid says...
4:49am Sat 21 Jan 12

┄Typical Townies
not understanding the ways of the
country.┄

┄Mr
Somerville and his partner Mr
Cripps┄

Peter by the sound of it Cripps&Somerville had been walking their dogs along the same track for some time (possibly local), so I don't think village/town was the issue.

The “clash of cultures” must mean something else any ideas?

Lord Palmerstone says...
7:00am Sat 21 Jan 12

Some sense from one of our Lords. Can't have you approving of me, so try this. If, as should have happened the matter had proceeded under Section 16a Firearms Act 1968, which is why it was in Crown Court in the first place, and if the sentence had been anything less than the statutory maximum of 10 years then CPS (why did they take a low plea on an absolute dead cert?) would have appealed on undue lenience grounds, having regard to the fact that the victims were members of a group sanctified by the Blairbrown slow motion train crash.

xjohnx says...
2:48pm Sat 21 Jan 12

Sounds to me like those two 'dog walkers' set up the situation. How long had they been winding up the farmer?
A shotgun is a country tool. In town, would they have feigned fear of him running them over instead?

King Joke says...
1:09pm Sun 22 Jan 12

xjohnx wrote:
Sounds to me like those two 'dog walkers' set up the situation. How long had they been winding up the farmer? A shotgun is a country tool. In town, would they have feigned fear of him running them over instead?
Threatening to run someone over is no better and no worse than waving a gun at them. THe threat of physical violence should be abhorrent to most of us in a civilised society, and the law should be dealing with this in the strongest terms.

If a thug waved a legally-owned kitchen knife at someone in Hackney over a percieved slight, he would be looking a couple of years inside. The least this feller should have got is loss of a firearm licence for a number of years. THis is undue leniency.

Kropotkin says...
2:18pm Sun 22 Jan 12

And try being young and found with a kitchen knife let alone producing it. Automatic jail.

One law for ...

Kropotkin says...
2:18pm Sun 22 Jan 12

And try being young and found with a kitchen knife let alone producing it. Automatic jail.

One law for ...

Kropotkin says...
2:18pm Sun 22 Jan 12

And try being young and found with a kitchen knife let alone producing it. Automatic jail.

One law for ...

Darkforbid says...
4:37pm Sun 22 Jan 12

┄And try being young and
found with a kitchen knife let alone producing it. Automatic jail.

One law for...┄

?? You can carry a knife in the UK, if you have a good reason...

Kitchen knife and Nightclub or pub, is not going to work

But a Leatherman is a toolkit so is legal...

I generally carry a woodaxe around but have a reason so its legal

BigAlBiker says...
8:54am Mon 23 Jan 12

I carry an offensive weapon around in my jeans every day, although it gets used very rarely.

King Joke says...
9:25am Mon 23 Jan 12

Big Al, if you brandished it at some dog walkers, I think the beak might take a dim view of it!

## Nonny Mouse ## says...
10:53am Mon 23 Jan 12

The Farmer in this case should'nt have used his gun as a deterent and should really get his licence revoked for that. That is not on. Also, he has done a diservice to the Agricultural community with his actions.

However, far too many people do not respect our rights of way and think they can 'ramble freely'. You can't. What they were doing was trespassing. End of. Also, were these dogs on leashes? Were they fowling on the land? The land belongs to a dairy farm, it is of grave importance that the land is kept free of infection etc. Also, had these dogs been of the lead and started chasing cattle around causing injury, the farmer would have little discourse.

It is these pressures that provoked such a bad reaction from the farmer, but i don't condone them for one instant.

King Joke says...
10:59am Mon 23 Jan 12

Spot on Nonny. Just because someone is in the wrong doesn't give you the right to wave weapons about.

When my dog was younger and could do the mileage I used to take off for whole days with just an OS map. I always stuck to the paths marked in green. I think it should be made clearer the dangers that dogs pose to all livestock, not just sheep.

xjohnx says...
3:09pm Mon 23 Jan 12

I say again, I think this may well have been a set up by the walkers.
Apart from the two dog walkers themselves, who saw him threaten them?
I myself have been threatened by so called dogwalkers. Unfortunately they had mistaken me for a landowner.

Lord Palmerstone says...
6:12pm Mon 23 Jan 12

xjohnx wrote:
I say again, I think this may well have been a set up by the walkers.
Apart from the two dog walkers themselves, who saw him threaten them?
I myself have been threatened by so called dogwalkers. Unfortunately they had mistaken me for a landowner.
Apart from the two dog walkers themselves, who saw him threaten them?
He did. That's why he pleaded to the lesser charge, with massive relief.

LORD PETE MCVEY OX2 6EG says...
9:18pm Mon 23 Jan 12

Lord Palmerstone wrote:
xjohnx wrote:
I say again, I think this may well have been a set up by the walkers.
Apart from the two dog walkers themselves, who saw him threaten them?
I myself have been threatened by so called dogwalkers. Unfortunately they had mistaken me for a landowner.
Apart from the two dog walkers themselves, who saw him threaten them?
He did. That's why he pleaded to the lesser charge, with massive relief.
Maybe he should have just shot them, no witnesses then. But seriously I don't know why you lot are so wound up, all he did was tell them forcibly to get off of his land with their dirty animals, and in a manner that they would take seriously and not come back. He used reasonable force, in fact not any force at all, but under the supposed new law he did nothing wrong in protecting his property. So actually nothing has changed, and you wake up to find some scroat in your bedroom robbing you, then you must politely ask him to leave because if you frighten him by pulling out a weapon then you are still going to be nicked.

King Joke says...
9:46pm Mon 23 Jan 12

Straying onto a field while walking the mutt hardly equates to robbing somebody's house. You might be happy living in a society where firearms are waved around to scare the living crap out of people but most of us certainly are not.

millybeau says...
12:03am Tue 24 Jan 12

they didn't "stray" into somebody's field.. it was a daily routine ! If i took my dog into next doors' vegetable patch to go to the toilet I would expect to be told to *****get off my land. Likewise, if somebody regularly brought their dog into my garden to have a c**p I would probably get a little fed up with it and if the response was one of arrogance then it would probably try my patience. No difference to the waste of money spent on the court case !!

Lord Palmerstone says...
7:33am Tue 24 Jan 12

Perhaps we should just repeal the OAPA 1861 and then he could set spring guns to protect the bank's land. The point remains, he's not well in the head to behave like this.

oxfordbuddy says...
10:41am Tue 24 Jan 12

Waving a shotgun at someone is called 'just the ways of the country'. Unbelievable. I was once threatened like this too, out with my family, we strayed unintentionally off the footpath. Up comes Farmer Giles in his quadbike thingy with 4 rampant dogs in the back waving his gun. We explained and apologised and as he directed us back to the footpath, he said 'I wouldn't want to be walking around here with kiddies, we do a lot of deer shooting'. Talk about harrassment! And farmers so often block footpaths, churn them up, remove footpath signs so as to make walking in the countryside impossible. They are so often the nastiest people around and then they expect us to go to farmers markets and buy their produce and sympathise with them over their 'battle with the supermarkets'. At least the manager of Tescos can be expected to behave in a civil manner!

punisher22 says...
11:15pm Tue 24 Jan 12

No wonder there are incidents with firearms where many people are killed when the police/courts let a mad **** farmer keep his licence....he should be stripped of it IMMEDIATLEY......

the wizard says...
7:46am Wed 25 Jan 12

As I said in the first reply to the article, Farmers, not my favourite people but if some of you got off your Town and City backsides and spent a few days with "Farmers" then you would appreciate his stance. Thing is political correctness and health and safety have got to most, so lets put it like this, brandishing is one thing, but he had the self control, NOT, to use it, and that is something else, add to that it was in all probability NOT loaded either.
I'll also bet that the dog walkers, nor any of their buddies go that way again. Too many people with dogs roaming the fields spreading all sorts of infections to cattle and crops, and I'll bet the likes of those two walk their dogs across the fields when the whole farming community is fighting the likes of Foot and Mouth, mindless idiots.

LORD PETE MCVEY OX2 6EG says...
7:38pm Wed 25 Jan 12

oxfordbuddy wrote:
Waving a shotgun at someone is called 'just the ways of the country'. Unbelievable. I was once threatened like this too, out with my family, we strayed unintentionally off the footpath. Up comes Farmer Giles in his quadbike thingy with 4 rampant dogs in the back waving his gun. We explained and apologised and as he directed us back to the footpath, he said 'I wouldn't want to be walking around here with kiddies, we do a lot of deer shooting'. Talk about harrassment! And farmers so often block footpaths, churn them up, remove footpath signs so as to make walking in the countryside impossible. They are so often the nastiest people around and then they expect us to go to farmers markets and buy their produce and sympathise with them over their 'battle with the supermarkets'. At least the manager of Tescos can be expected to behave in a civil manner!
Look more carefully next time you invade some body else's property, do not assume that it is your right. Your imaginary farmer was at least polite enough to warn you about the shooting on HIS LAND, instead he could have let you carry on and be shot in mistake for a deer, you should be thankful.

LORD PETE MCVEY OX2 6EG says...
7:41pm Wed 25 Jan 12

Lord Palmerstone wrote:
Perhaps we should just repeal the OAPA 1861 and then he could set spring guns to protect the bank's land. The point remains, he's not well in the head to behave like this.
Sorry NO M'LUD. It is his property and livlihood. And having regular interlopers destroying his land with their dogs sh!t etc is not on. The police do not care, so you have to make it clear that those people are not allowed to use your land as a dogs toilet.

LORD PETE MCVEY OX2 6EG says...
7:43pm Wed 25 Jan 12

millybeau wrote:
they didn't "stray" into somebody's field.. it was a daily routine ! If i took my dog into next doors' vegetable patch to go to the toilet I would expect to be told to *****get off my land. Likewise, if somebody regularly brought their dog into my garden to have a c**p I would probably get a little fed up with it and if the response was one of arrogance then it would probably try my patience. No difference to the waste of money spent on the court case !!
Exactly.

King Joke says...
8:39pm Wed 25 Jan 12

The issue here is the threat of lethal force, not trespass or loss of livelihood. Aggravated hreatening behaviour is as vile in a field as it is on Cornmarket.

I work for an energy company where 'downsizing' has been happening during the current climate. As such my livelihood is threatened by repated customer service calls wiping out margin, non-payment of debt, breach of contract and so on. Do I go round and wave guns at people who do this? No.

Do bookshop owners go up the Amazon warehouse waving machetes? No.

Do bus inspectors stand at the roadside pointing guns at motorists in bus lanes? No.

Farmers shouldn't be any different.

Lord Palmerstone says...
10:16pm Wed 25 Jan 12

LPMV you'll have to point me to the bit where Farmer Giles asked the 2 confirmed bachelors not to trespass, politely, without guns, on some previous occasion, then I could agree with you.

Dilligaf2010 says...
2:02am Thu 26 Jan 12

I don't suppose there were any signs telling people the land was private property, and not a public right of way?
Can't be a proper farmer anyway, he should've shouted "Get orff my laand!" :)

## Nonny Mouse ## says...
9:07am Thu 26 Jan 12

'he said 'I wouldn't want to be walking around here with kiddies, we do a lot of deer shooting'. Talk about harrassment!'

Harrassment? What is harrassing with that? That along with your other mindless bigoted views show you have little or no understanding of what goes on in the countryside. It is industrial land. Pests such as deer are controlled with lethal force on a daily basis. This is strictly controlled and done away from public rights of way etc so that YOU and your ilk DON'T get shot! If you are trespassing and accidentally take a bullet, the land owner is still culpable.

'No wonder there are incidents with firearms where many people are killed when the police/courts let a mad **** farmer keep his licence'

I suppose you are tarring him with the Raoul Moat brush? He was 1 licenced gun-owner that went crackers. How about all the un-licenced firearms in the country that are in the hands of 'children' in our inner cities. I am substantially more worried about that, personally.

Dilligaf2010 says...
11:26am Thu 26 Jan 12

## Nonny Mouse ## wrote:
'he said 'I wouldn't want to be walking around here with kiddies, we do a lot of deer shooting'. Talk about harrassment!'

Harrassment? What is harrassing with that? That along with your other mindless bigoted views show you have little or no understanding of what goes on in the countryside. It is industrial land. Pests such as deer are controlled with lethal force on a daily basis. This is strictly controlled and done away from public rights of way etc so that YOU and your ilk DON'T get shot! If you are trespassing and accidentally take a bullet, the land owner is still culpable.

'No wonder there are incidents with firearms where many people are killed when the police/courts let a mad **** farmer keep his licence'

I suppose you are tarring him with the Raoul Moat brush? He was 1 licenced gun-owner that went crackers. How about all the un-licenced firearms in the country that are in the hands of 'children' in our inner cities. I am substantially more worried about that, personally.
Actually, I think you'll find the Countryside is Agricultural Land, if you were actually as knowledgeable as you claim, you'd know that.

King Joke says...
11:47am Thu 26 Jan 12

Let's say it's industrial land, which in many ways it is. If you walk your dog across some far corner of the BMW site, or one of the large units on Osney Mead, you'd be horrified if a security guard got a shooter out. of his van, and the guard would be hauled over the coals for over-stepping their authority. THere should be no special consideration for farmers, they can observe the same laws as the rest of us.

## Nonny Mouse ## says...
1:15pm Thu 26 Jan 12

You will see from my previous comments that i am not condoning the guy's behaviour. It's downright irresponsible.

What i am getting peeved about is ignoramuses like 'oxfordbuddy' spouting stuff like 'They (farmers) are so often the nastiest people around'. I'm sure others would get annoyed if you exchanged the word Farmer for 'civil servant/policeman/bi
nman'.

And as for suggesting that Farmer's are in someway responsible for gun related fatality statistics is just laughable.

Local Businesses

Most popular