City council 'plans to abolish area committees' (From thisisoxfordshire)
When It Happens Panel Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting 'OXFORD NEWS' to 80360 or email
City council 'plans to abolish area committees'
7:00am Wednesday 13th April 2011 in News By Chris Buratta
Stephen Brown
OXFORD City Council is pushing ahead with controversial plans to overhaul its decision making despite public opposition.
The authority plans to downgrade its area committees that deal with neighbourhood issues, planning applications and grants to community groups.
It would also hand greater power to councillors on the executive board, allowing them to take decisions on their own. The Labour administration said it would improve efficiency and decision making.
It also said area committees were “overly influenced” by the public on planning decisions which had lead to the council losing costly appeals.
But the council’s public consultation revealed the majority of people were against the moves and opposition councillors claimed it had been designed to centralise power within the ruling Labour group.
Public opposition to each of the changes ranged between 55 and 86 per cent.
The council executive board is set to approve the plans at its meeting tonight, but a meeting of full council would need to ratify the decision next week.
Under the proposals, the six area committees that meet monthly would be axed and replaced by area forums that would meet quarterly.
They would also be stripped of planning powers, which would be handed to two newly created east and west planning committees.
Individual councillors would also be given a £1,500 budget to spend on neighbourhood projects or holding community meetings. Liberal Democrat leader Stephen Brown said their was “no reason of justification” for removing planning powers from area committees.
He said: “It is patently obvious, by any stretch of the imagination, the public do not want these changes.
“What is the point of having a consultation and then appearing not to take any notice of it? It is all about centralising and controlling.”
But council leader Bob Price said allowing single executive board members to take “non-controversial” decisions would improve efficiency.
He said area committees were not objective enough in deciding planning applications and this had lead to costly appeals being lost.
And he added the public consultation was not a fair representation of Oxford.
He said: “The number of people who responded was about 180.
“It is not a significant proportion of the city and most of them had a vested interest in maintaining the current committees.
“The opposition parties tried to get people to write in.”
Comments(10)
EBTWO
says...
9:17am Wed 13 Apr 11
GET RID OF THESE IDIOTS BEFORE THEY SPEND YET MORE OF OUR MONEY
Better still just get rid of Oxford City Council. Never before have I met such a bunch of incompenant idiots. The estates department especially...
OxfordResident
says...
12:03pm Wed 13 Apr 11
EBTWO wrote:OX11 8AZ - you appear to be from Didcot, so what relevence exactly does Oxford City Council have for you?
Typical Labour control freakery. Spend money on more bureaucrats and making non-jobs. So now we have no say in planning and other council services. No more consultations.
GET RID OF THESE IDIOTS BEFORE THEY SPEND YET MORE OF OUR MONEY
Better still just get rid of Oxford City Council. Never before have I met such a bunch of incompenant idiots. The estates department especially...
newcy
says...
12:08pm Wed 13 Apr 11
newcy
says...
12:09pm Wed 13 Apr 11
newcy
says...
12:18pm Wed 13 Apr 11
Seconded! Driven entirely by profit-seeking and idleness -only motivated by the quest for maximum revenue for minimum or no effort. If it doesn't pay nicely, they won't do anything.
EBTWO
says...
12:59pm Wed 13 Apr 11
OxfordResident wrote:"OX11 8AZ - you appear to be from Didcot, so what relevence exactly does Oxford City Council have for you?"
EBTWO wrote:OX11 8AZ - you appear to be from Didcot, so what relevence exactly does Oxford City Council have for you?
Typical Labour control freakery. Spend money on more bureaucrats and making non-jobs. So now we have no say in planning and other council services. No more consultations.
GET RID OF THESE IDIOTS BEFORE THEY SPEND YET MORE OF OUR MONEY
Better still just get rid of Oxford City Council. Never before have I met such a bunch of incompenant idiots. The estates department especially...
I was - that was a long time ago. I am Oxford born, have lived in and owned a business in Oxford, so have had to deal with many sections of Oxford City Council, and I can honestly say they are hopeless.
No-one takes any responsibility - all the staff can do is "take instruction" (this is what they say on the phone) and pass it on to another manager, who passes it on......and repeat. They are just abysmal.
I hate Oxford City Council. They were partly responsible for my business closing and they have ruined one of the most famous cities in the world.
If you're as proud of your city as I am, you'd feel the same way.
Mr Peter Mcvay
says...
6:11pm Wed 13 Apr 11
newcy wrote:It is actually a good thing, Newcy. Because all the NIMBYS get certain planning permission turned down through personal interest and not on the merit of the application, which in turn costs us £thousands when the developer wins the appeal. Whereas now this should not happen so often, as applications will be judged solely on merit, and not by some hysterical mob ranting no to this and that all the time.
My point being that they are now being more open and official about their efforts to reduce or remove public 'say' in planning decisions. Not that this is a good thing.
Victor Meldrew2
says...
7:32pm Wed 13 Apr 11
If the poll had been opened to the public ' do you want more power to go to the councillors' I'm sure we all know the result of that.
Now we have democracy, British democracy and Bob Price democracy which appears to give decisions to fewer and fewer people as the general public can't be trusted to make the 'correct' decisons.
Oxford taxpayer
says...
8:16pm Wed 13 Apr 11
mjdmorton says...
8:59am Wed 13 Apr 11