When It Happens Panel Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting 'OXFORD NEWS' to 80360 or email
7:30am Friday 19th March 2010 in
A CONTROVERSIAL £132m revamp of Oxford Brookes University’s Headington Campus was given the go-ahead last night.
Councillors voted 24 to 10 in favour of the Gipsy Lane site redevelopment at a full council meeting in the Town Hall.
Campaigners have been fighting the scheme, which would provide a new home for the university’s library, computer centre, lecture theatres and students’ union.
But last night they accepted the battle was over.
Neighbours opposed to the four-storey structure raised concerns about its size and proximity to nearby houses during the meeting.
There were also fears it would put pressure on what they claimed was an antiquated sewerage system.
Colin Rosser, a member of Headington Hill Residents’ Association, said: “We know from the ongoing crisis with sewers, not to mention additional noise, traffic and light pollution, that the infrastructure is hardly able to bear this kind of overbuilding.
“We have come to the end of the road now after 15 months of fighting. I think a lot of people will be depressed when they hear this.”
It is the second time the plan has gone before the full council.
The first application, in June was approved by the strategic development control committee (SDCC).
But councillors turned it had been turned down in September following concerns about its size.
The university scaled down and resubmitted plans in December.
The height of the library was reduced from five storeys with a basement, to four storeys with a larger underground section, which cut three metres off the height.
These were initially approved by the council, but councillors once again called in the plan.
Last night, Oxford Brookes said it was delighted by the decision.
Vice-chancellor Professor Janet Beer said: “This development will provide generations of students with inspirational teaching and learning spaces.
“Oxford Brookes makes a huge contribution to the economic well-being of the city and the region – we add £1m a day to the local and national economy. These facilities are essential to the continued success of the university.”
Comments(11)
scupper
says...
9:31am Fri 19 Mar 10
Concerned one
says...
10:05am Fri 19 Mar 10
LadyPenelope
says...
10:22am Fri 19 Mar 10
bifocal bill
says...
11:43am Fri 19 Mar 10
Pierre My
says...
11:50am Fri 19 Mar 10
LadyPenelope wrote:Because it will just add to the drunken/drug fuelled anti-social behaviour that the local residents have to put up with. Along with the rubbish filled, vermin attracting gardens of the student houses, not to mention the destruction of communities as families are forced out. But living in the middle of nowhere, you wouldn't have these problems.
Excellent news. The development looks great! Not sure why people were against it...
oxman
says...
12:13pm Fri 19 Mar 10
Pierre My wrote:You've just described the areas of Cowley and Blackbird Leys that I have lived in, yet there were no students in those areas. Strange.
LadyPenelope wrote:Because it will just add to the drunken/drug fuelled anti-social behaviour that the local residents have to put up with. Along with the rubbish filled, vermin attracting gardens of the student houses, not to mention the destruction of communities as families are forced out. But living in the middle of nowhere, you wouldn't have these problems.
Excellent news. The development looks great! Not sure why people were against it...
LadyPenelope
says...
12:18pm Fri 19 Mar 10
Mike Ratcliffe
says...
1:41pm Fri 19 Mar 10
Pierre My wrote:Pierre,
LadyPenelope wrote: Excellent news. The development looks great! Not sure why people were against it...Because it will just add to the drunken/drug fuelled anti-social behaviour that the local residents have to put up with. Along with the rubbish filled, vermin attracting gardens of the student houses, not to mention the destruction of communities as families are forced out. But living in the middle of nowhere, you wouldn't have these problems.
Tom Daily
says...
11:48pm Sun 21 Mar 10
pater mcvey
says...
11:09pm Mon 22 Mar 10
Mike Ratcliffe wrote:Yes it is a library, but it is a shame that they don't keep as quiet outside as they do in. Or maybe we should open it at 3am on a Tuesday morning so that they can come straight from the Bridge (via Kebab Kid) and carry on their partying there. I wonder how long the powers that be in the Poly would put up with that for? Probably about 30 seconds. But as long as their little darlings make our (the plebs) lives a misery and not theirs, that is alright then.
Pierre My wrote:Pierre, It's a library.LadyPenelope wrote: Excellent news. The development looks great! Not sure why people were against it...Because it will just add to the drunken/drug fuelled anti-social behaviour that the local residents have to put up with. Along with the rubbish filled, vermin attracting gardens of the student houses, not to mention the destruction of communities as families are forced out. But living in the middle of nowhere, you wouldn't have these problems.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find your next job now in Oxfordshire
Search Now »
Make a date in Oxfordshire now!
Search Now »
Oxfordshire homes for sale and to let
Search Now »
Cars for sale in Oxfordshire
Search Now »
oxford-2008 says...
9:21am Fri 19 Mar 10