News RSS Feed


CPRE launches fresh defence of Green Belt


A CAMPAIGN group battling plans to build thousands of homes near Oxford’s Grenoble Road has released a document highlighting the importance of the city’s Green Belt.

The Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE), along with Natural England, said land around the city must be protected to prevent Oxford falling victim to the “uncontrolled urban sprawl” spreading through Britain.

They claimed the area’s agricultural, environmental and historical importance were reasons why it must not be built on.

Last month, we revealed the South East Area plan to build up to 4,000 new homes near Blackbird Leys was being challenged legally.

The Oxford City Council-backed scheme is on hold while a High Court judge reviews the plan.

CPRE Oxfordshire campaign manager Dr Helena Whall said: “By protecting land from development, the Oxford Green Belt has protected the setting of the historic city of Oxford and prevented the uncontrolled urban sprawl witnessed in many other cities.

“This report shows that the Green Belt is much more than a planning designation. It is a vital environmental resource that can help with the production of locally grown food, can support wildlife and can provide breathing places for city dwellers and others.”

The Oxford Green Belt was established more than 50 years ago and covers 66,868 hectares.

In Green Belts: a Greener Future, the two groups have vowed to protect the land by “continuing to uphold existing Government planning policy, focusing on better land management, maintaining and improving the Green Belt’s ecological network and encouraging more public use of the area”.

Oxfordshire CPRE believes it secured a High Court victory in September, when the Government admitted its plan was flawed. It agreed to remove any references to a strategic development area south of Oxford from the South East Plan.

Dr Whall added: “The report confirms that the countryside around the city of Oxford is a vital, but fragile, environmental asset.

“We must not sacrifice the health of the city of Oxford and the surrounding environment by allowing plans to build homes in protected countryside.”

Nationally, Green Belts cover 13 per cent of the land surface, with 30 million people living in or next to one.

Michael Crofton-Briggs, head of development at the city council, said: “We are currently awaiting the outcome of the legal challenges to the South East Plan.

“The delays are outside our control and we are still awaiting the formal court decision.”


Your Say YourOxfordshire

GaryOxford, Oxford says...
11:27pm Fri 5 Feb 10

I think it's disgraceful that Oxford City Council want to build houses to provide shelter for the people of Oxford. Don't they realise that housing is there primarily as a means for baby boomers/NIMBYs/CPRE members to profiteer from at the expense of younger generations?

Petre Mcvay, Barton says...
4:11am Sat 6 Feb 10

Peeople like Dr Wally would make me laugh if their actions weren't so serious. One assumes that she is campaigning from the comfort of her OWN home. I wonder that, if she was paying half her wages to live in 1 room in a house full of strangers she would be so fervent in her efforts to stop HOMES for people being built.

Isisbridge, Oxford says...
10:28am Sat 6 Feb 10

If housing waiting lists didn't give priority to the feckless and to those with unplanned pregnancies, then working people might not have to live in bedsits.

Building more and more houses on green belt will not solve the housing shortage unless efforts are made to control immigration and population growth.

Joe Cooke, Oxford says...
1:21pm Sat 6 Feb 10

We must build on this land, the people against it are Nimby's who are lucky enough to have a home.

Andrew:Oxford, Oxford says...
2:25pm Sat 6 Feb 10

Where are the pylons, the massive electric substation, sewage works and portable-building storage facility on the "green belt" picture the good Dr is holding? All are currently on the land south of Grenoble Road... Oxford needs more homes, affordable homes for real working people to buy and live in, only say 20% for social rental. There should also be a 10 year restrictive covenant to prevent the new homes being privately rented in order that a real community can be established.

Jonathan Gittos, Wolvercote says...
5:02pm Sat 6 Feb 10

Some of the comments above seem quite 'co-ordinated'. Surely arguing that housing should not be built on Green Belt or that Oxford should not become a sprawling concrete clone-town, is quite reasonable and not the same as arguing that the social housing is not needed anywhere in the area.

There are major two bits of free-standing Green Belt in the south of England, one around Oxford, the other around Cambridge in order to protect their beauty and setting. Oxford was the second fastest-growing City in the UK over the last ten years. Much of that growth has been driven by huge deliberate 'co-ordinated' state-sector growth and migration into the city. The council wants that to continue whereas many of us believe that Oxford has reached the rough limit of population growth if it is not to start looking as beautiful as Swindon. We have a housing waiting-list of (I think) 3,000 people which we can easily accomodate within the existing city. The councils 'co-ordinated' rush to expand the city is always justified by housing need and social deprivation but so often seems to operate to favour big developers and big government.

Joe Cooke, Oxford says...
5:15pm Sat 6 Feb 10

Thats the point, people on the council waiting list have to wait years, many are Oxford born people, why should they have to move to Witney, Bicester or Didcot because they can not afford to live in Oxford where as people not born in Oxford get houses either because they are rich or they jump the council list for one reason or another. Anyway the land south of Grenoble road is hardly a beauty spot is it.

GaryOxford, Oxford says...
7:13pm Sat 6 Feb 10

@Jonathan Gittos
There are 4000 people on the council waiting list. Where precisely are they to be housed within the city? According to you this is easily achievable so I would expect a succinct response.

I do not know whether you are a member of CPRE or not but I find it laughable that you argue against what you allege to be a 'co-ordinated' response to CPRE's latest vexatious legal challenge. However CPRE ‘co-ordinate’ opposition to any development yet you don’t criticise this. Hypocrisy anyone? I for one am not part of any ‘co-ordinated’ opposition to CPRE’s legal challenge. I am just a younger person who is sick and tired of paying through the nose to live in a slum because Oxford City Council has not provided enough social housing or allowed enough private housing to be built in an attempt to inflate house prices for a selected few.

Thirdly, CPRE call for housing densities of 50 homes per hectare. How many members of CPRE live in housing that meets this figure?

Jonathan Gittos, Wolvercote says...
8:27pm Sat 6 Feb 10

Gary - I'm not a member of CPRE but I support their aims so guess I should join. Perhaps I shouldn't have said "easily" but the Council's own plans show that they believe they can build (I think) 8,000 houses within the existing city boundaries on brownfield land, some new developments and natural growth. I've lived all my adult life in housing much denser than 50-homes-per-hectare and I think that is the way we should build our cities with high-quality design, easy cycling, short bus journeys and local shops that allow a real community to flourish. I believe we've got to stop building sprawling divided ghettoes of 'wealthy' or 'social' dwellings - we're just repeating the mistakes of the past and I'm very suspicious of Oxford City Council's supposed 'social' motives. Many people believe their consistent but unstated aim has been to grow the city and expand their rule - political not human motives...

Headington-Heathcliff, oxford says...
1:59pm Mon 8 Feb 10

If the green belt has to be loosened a bit, then the least attractive countryside should be built on. Looking around Oxford's edges, I'd say south of Greater Leys is that place. I declare my interest: I live in Marston and I think the countryside around Elsfield is fantastic. Also, Wytham Woods and Shotover are irreplaceable. But those flat fields beside the Leys - who would miss them? I bet the farmers/owners will retire on the proceeds.

Petre Mcvay, Barton says...
3:52am Tue 9 Feb 10

Also the bottom (wolvecote) end of port meadow is very dreary with the railway line running alongside. This would be perfect for a few thousand houses and they could re-open the wolvecote halt to bring people into the city by rail, what do you reckon GITtos

Comments are closed on this article.

CPRE Oxfordshire campaign manager Dr Helena Whall CPRE Oxfordshire campaign manager Dr Helena Whall

Stay with Prague Hotels | Visit Spain with Barcelona Hotels

Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »