News RSS Feed


Floods: Bridge will not be replaced


RESIDENTS fear they have been left defenceless after promised bridge works were withdrawn.

Seven households in The Heath, Milton-under-Wychwood, have been flooded up to three times in three years.

They were told that Church Road bridge would be replaced, costing £100,000, in a bid to stop water building up and flowing into nearby properties.

However, the Environment Agency (EA) has said that it will build a flood storage pond upstream of The Heath.

Oxfordshire County Council is also planning to construct a pipe through one side of the bridge, to allow more flood water to flow through.

Peter Collins, EA flood risk management team leader, said: “While we appreciate residents will be disappointed that the Church Road bridge is not being replaced, we will be working with the county council to deliver a package of works that will reduce their flood risk.”

EA spokesman, Richard Crowe, added: “The council is committed to carrying out works to The Heath bridge, and the Environment Agency assisted with assessing the impacts of flood risk.

“A number of options were considered, which included bridge replacement.”

Residents Gill and John Fox, of The Heath, were flooded twice in 2007. Water also flowed into neighbours’ homes in 2008.

Mrs Fox, 63, said: “There is still nothing that prevents me from picking up my furniture and everything and moving it upstairs each time I go on holiday, which is not something you should do at the age of 63.

“The solution, without any ongoing maintenance, is to enlarge the bridge.

“It’s too low, and the water can’t get through it.

“If the bridge gives way, it will be like a tsunami. Flood storage ponds will not help, we know this.”

Mrs Fox has been to many meetings in the village, where she claims residents were promised the bridge works. They even formed a campaign group, called Littlestock Brook Action Group.

She said: “I grew up in the age where if you said something, you meant it, and I don’t think it is fair to treat people like this.

“In two years, they have done nothing.”

County Hall spokesman Owen Morton said: “Oxfordshire County Council indicated it would pursue plans to install a larger bridge if flood modelling work carried out by the Environment Agency indicated this was the appropriate solution.

“The latest flood modelling report indicated that a replacement bridge would not provide significant benefit to those houses most at risk of flooding and as such, the council has concluded that the scheme is not justified.”

Comments(3)

lozzie24 says...
9:05am Fri 29 Jan 10

Howcome they can spare the money to resurface the town roads once or twice a year which is unnecessary but cannot build a bridge that could change the lives of people and which could mean if the worst happens and the bridge collapses peoples homes, lifes and possessions ruined. I wonder if this bridge was near where "the decision makers" lives would the result be different!

yentiw says...
3:35pm Sun 31 Jan 10

Face it, they don't give a ****. Look at the politically-correct jargon they use, 'Flood Modelling Report', I ask you! £100,000 is peanuts. Likely scenario for the future: you will be flooded again. And again. Just like the highways, patch this, patch that - exactly why our road network has fallen apart (it's not the weather - it's a long story of hiving out this and that to private companies etc etc and the job is not properly nor correctly done, simply because of one reason and one reason only, 'saving money'.

yentiw says...
3:39pm Sun 31 Jan 10

As an addition to the above by me, even this site is governed by daft pc logic. The 4 asterisks suggest to the reader I have sworn! Nothing could be further from the truth. The word this system has automatically 'banned was 'd a m n'.
How politically ridiculous our masters are today, eh? The nanny-state is here.


Worried residents Worried residents

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses