News RSS Feed


Health chiefs ration expensive weight-loss surgery


WEIGHT-LOSS surgery which it is claimed could benefit 10,000 people in Oxfordshire is being rationed by county health chiefs to save money.

The Royal College of Surgeons said the NHS should recognise surgery, such as gastric bands, as the best treatment for serious obesity – a call backed by an Oxford surgeon.

Last year NHS Oxfordshire – the county’s primary care trust – received 64 requests for surgery, which can cost up to £14,000, but only approved 25 cases.

The trust said it could not afford to carry out more operations.

Nick Maynard, a surgeon who works privately at Oxford’s John Radcliffe Hospital, called for a rethink.

He said: “There is proof that this treatment works.

“Up to 10,000 Oxfordshire people could benefit.

“Between 60 to 70 per cent of type two diabetes can be cured through surgery, the risk of heart disease can also be very significantly reduced, and other conditions such as the breathing problems associated with being overweight can be improved.”

Clare Burnett, 51, from Wallingford, was fitted with a gastric band to help her lose weight.

She said: “I did have some reservations before, but now I am in awe of gastric surgery.It has changed my life.”

The National Institute of health and Clinical Excellence (Nice), which provides guidelines on NHS care, thinks patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 40 or above should be referred for surgery.

A healthy BMI falls between 19 and 25 per cent body fat.

A BMI of 25-30 is classed as overweight, and over 30 is considered obese.

It is estimated that about half of Oxfordshire’s 635,500 population is overweight or obese – with five per cent morbidly obese, meaning they have a BMI above 40.

Nice said people with a BMI of between 35 and 40 who have other conditions should also be referred.

But NHS Oxfordshire, which needs to make £80m savings, will only pay for the surgery for those with a BMI over 50 who also have a serious weight-related illness.

The trust has been asked to consider surgery for anyone with a BMI of more than 50 – and those with a BMI of more than 40 who have diabetes.

But the trust said it would cost an extra £750,000 in the next financial year.

It said it was already spending £600,000 a year treating obesity.

A spokesman said a review at the end of the year would reconsider resources.

Cancer treatment campaigner Clive Stone, from Freeland, said the NHS was right to make priorities. He said: “Someone who is dying because they can’t get drugs is a higher priority than someone who wants this surgery.”

CLARE Burnett has battled with her weight most of her adult life.

At 5ft 5ins tall and 16st, Ms Burnett, 51, from Wallingford said she had always been conscious of her weight.

She said her father, who had diabetes, had suffered a major stroke and her mother died of a heart attack in 2006.

She added: “I felt my weight was increasing the chance of experiencing the same conditions.”

With a BMI of 37 she was not eligible to have surgery on the NHS so had a gastric band fitted privately last August. Since then she has lost two-and-a-half stone, moving from a dress size 22 to a loose-fitting 18.



Your Say YourOxfordshire

Quentin Walker, Oxford says...
7:45am Tue 26 Jan 10

it would be useful if the article stated how much obesity was unavoidable, due to medical conditions (if any) and how much was self-inflicted.

LadyPenelope, West Oxon says...
8:04am Tue 26 Jan 10

Very few cases of obesity are caused by a medical conditions. Most the medical conditions they suffer from are due to the obesity, which in turn prevents them from loosing weight.
I don't think gastric bands should be free on the NHS.

phantom flan flinger, tiswas says...
8:44am Tue 26 Jan 10

Eat less you fat gits,
I've never see any one in Cambodia who is fat because of their metabolism or any other BS reason!

Eat less!

Headington-Heathcliff, oxford says...
11:07am Tue 26 Jan 10

I don't want t pay for somebody's self-inflicted, slobbish obesity. I also don't want to pay for stitching up binge drinkers who have enough money to get their drink but expect to be patched up for nothing. I hope spending cuts force the NHS to stick to the basics and do it well rather than mop up after people who can't take care of themselves. And smokers - better not start that one!

Green123, Witney says...
11:17am Tue 26 Jan 10

I am overweight for my height, and have a BMI that classifies me as 'obese', putting me into risk categories for diabetes and other illnesses. However, I am also fit and healthy, I eat well and enjoy a drink, but I also enjoy long walks and digging the garden and climbing mountains. There is no reason for the majority of overweight people to be unhealthy, and offering drastic, invasive and costly surgery on the NHS sends a dangerous message that it's OK to be fat, the NHS will just operate and sort you out.

Jamie Burns, Oxford says...
11:47am Tue 26 Jan 10

They wont pay for this, they wont pay for cancer drugs, they wont pay for IVF what exactly do they spend OUR money on ???

LadyPenelope, West Oxon says...
12:08pm Tue 26 Jan 10

Jamie Burns wrote:
They wont pay for this, they wont pay for cancer drugs, they wont pay for IVF what exactly do they spend OUR money on ???
You can hardly compare gastric bands and cancer drugs! The latter being a condition you generally have no control over! I would be furious if they'd paid for gastric bands, and denied someone cancer drugs!

Jamie Burns, Oxford says...
1:04pm Tue 26 Jan 10

LadyPenelope wrote:
Jamie Burns wrote:
They wont pay for this, they wont pay for cancer drugs, they wont pay for IVF what exactly do they spend OUR money on ???
You can hardly compare gastric bands and cancer drugs! The latter being a condition you generally have no control over! I would be furious if they'd paid for gastric bands, and denied someone cancer drugs!
Illness is illness - regardless of how or where it's contracted.

They pay for lung cancer treatment caused by smoking on a daily basis and yet kidney cancer drugs are denied.

My point is what are they spending our money on when all we ever hear about is what they won't spend it on.

STBO, says...
1:19pm Tue 26 Jan 10

Jamie Burns wrote:
LadyPenelope wrote:
Jamie Burns wrote:
They wont pay for this, they wont pay for cancer drugs, they wont pay for IVF what exactly do they spend OUR money on ???
You can hardly compare gastric bands and cancer drugs! The latter being a condition you generally have no control over! I would be furious if they'd paid for gastric bands, and denied someone cancer drugs!
Illness is illness - regardless of how or where it's contracted.

They pay for lung cancer treatment caused by smoking on a daily basis and yet kidney cancer drugs are denied.

My point is what are they spending our money on when all we ever hear about is what they won't spend it on.
Smokers more than cover their cost to the NHS in the amount of tax they pay on tobacco. Maybe fat people should put their biscuit allowance aside and they'd be able to pay for their own gastric band in no time at all. It's not a disease. Tax the fat!

abingdonguy, says...
1:32pm Tue 26 Jan 10

Is this another case of the NHS trust having to tightening their belts too?

Floflo, Oxford says...
2:48pm Tue 26 Jan 10

LadyPenelope wrote:
Jamie Burns wrote:
They wont pay for this, they wont pay for cancer drugs, they wont pay for IVF what exactly do they spend OUR money on ???
You can hardly compare gastric bands and cancer drugs! The latter being a condition you generally have no control over! I would be furious if they'd paid for gastric bands, and denied someone cancer drugs!
What about funding treatment for those injured in the pursuit of dangerous sport?
.
Someone who falls when out running?
.
What about if the person running is 80 years old, or has a history of heart problems?
.
Someone who injures themselves in a car crash when 2mph over the speed limit?
.
Someone who gets run over while crossing a busy road?
.
Where fitting a gastric band is cheaper than supporting the health problems of an obeste person?

LadyPenelope, West Oxon says...
3:20pm Tue 26 Jan 10

Floflo, your list of activities are all "what ifs" and involve an element of risk. Obesity is a choice.

b79, oxford says...
3:51pm Tue 26 Jan 10

TO LADYPENELOPE WHO THINKS SHE HAS THE RIGHT TO JUDGE PEOPLE WITHOUT FACT!
OBESE PEOPLE ALSO PAY TAX WITHOUT A SAY IN HOW IT IS SPENT. THE NHS WAS FOUNDED TO TREAT EVERYONE WITHOUT PREJUDICE BASED ON NEED. I WAS ON THE OXFORDSHIRE NHS LIST FOR BARIATRIC SURGERY UNDER MR MAYNARD BUT ALAS THEY PULLED THE FUNDING AT THE LAST MINUTE. MY WEIGHT GAIN WAS NOT TOTALLY MY FAULT. I HAVE A HISTORY OF BULIMIA WHICH RELAPSES IF I DIET. I HAVE ALSO BEEN ON VERY STRONG PSYCHIATRIC DRUGS WHICH INTEFERE WITH METABOLISM. IT WOULD BE CHEAPER TO TREAT ME NOW THEN PAY FOR LONG TERM CARE WHEN I AM UNABLE TO LOOK AFTER MYSELF.I HAVE APPEALED TO THE PCT BUT AFTER 4 MONTHS HAVE NOT HAD A REPLY.
THERE IS ALWAYS SOMEONE TO BLAME FOR AN ILLNESS OR DISEASE BUT SITUATIONS ARE NEVER ONE DIMENSIONAL. THERE ARE MANY FACTORS THAT CAUSE SOMEONE TO OVER EAT. SHOULD I BE BLAMED FOR THE TRAUMA THAT HAPPENED TO ME TO CAUSE MY EATING PROBLEMS? GENERALLY, NOT TREATING PEOPLE COSTS MORE IN THE LONG TERM. WHAT RIGHT HAS ANYONE TO DECIDE WHO IS WORTHY OF TREATMENT AND WHO ISN'T. CLEARLY LADYPENELOPE HAS NEVER LIVED IN THE REAL WORLD!

LadyPenelope, West Oxon says...
4:04pm Tue 26 Jan 10

b79, if you READ my initial post, you'll see it says "Very few cases of obesity are caused by a medical conditions." i.e. SOME cases are caused by medical conditions i.e yours. I do live in the real world, and obesity in most cases is a lifestyle choice.

Please don't write in capitals, as it makes it very difficult to read and comes across as aggressive.

Green123, Witney says...
4:42pm Tue 26 Jan 10

B79, as I said in my post above, I'm 'an obese person' myself, and yes, I pay my taxes like everyone else. But I DON'T want my taxes being spent by the NHS to treat people whose 'illness' can be avoided - I want the NHS to spend my taxes on treating people who are ill through no fault of their own. People who use anything to excess (be it nicotine, drugs, alcohol or food) and who are ill because of their lifestyle choices should NOT be prioritised over people with dangerous and life-limiting illnesses such as cancer.

Floflo, Oxford says...
5:04pm Tue 26 Jan 10

Green123 wrote:
B79, as I said in my post above, I'm 'an obese person' myself, and yes, I pay my taxes like everyone else. But I DON'T want my taxes being spent by the NHS to treat people whose 'illness' can be avoided - I want the NHS to spend my taxes on treating people who are ill through no fault of their own. People who use anything to excess (be it nicotine, drugs, alcohol or food) and who are ill because of their lifestyle choices should NOT be prioritised over people with dangerous and life-limiting illnesses such as cancer.
Would you also add to your list of those not worthy for treatment inactive people? Exercise for 30 minutes a day and your risk of heart disease is at least halved.
.
People who have very stressful jobs are also far more prone to illnesses. These are preventable.
.
People who get sun burnt and then develop skin cancer?

EB, Oxford says...
8:42pm Tue 26 Jan 10

"Someone who falls when out running?"

The health benefits of exercise far outweight the risks (and costs) of treatment.

People who choose to harm their health should contribute more to their treatment.

Green123, Witney says...
9:43pm Tue 26 Jan 10

I certainly would include inactive people, yes, Floflo. Unless someone is severely disabled there's no excuse to be completely inactive. A neighbour of mine drives his kids the five minutes down the road to school, drives a few minutes to the shops and drives to pick up a takeaway from round the corner.

And then I hear him puffing and panting when he has waddle down his path to wheel his bin out onto the drive. I rest my case...

Petre Mcvey, Barton says...
2:26am Wed 27 Jan 10

If somebody wants to fit and healthy then it is up to them, If somebody wishes to be fat then it is up to them. Nobody has the right to judge unless they are breaking the law, and the last time that I looked being fat was NOT illegal. It is another government brainwashing exercise to cover up their underfunding of the N.H.S. and I can't believe that in a town full of educated people, as oxford professes to be, you lot fell for it. P.S. Oh and Headington-Heathclif
f. You say "SMOKERS DON'T GET ME STARTED ON THAT ONE" I wish you would get started, no doubt you would tell us that smokers cost the N.H.S. £1.5 Billion a year. But I wonder if you would fail to mention that they CONTRIBUTE £9 Billion a year in Tobacco duty alone. Perhaps if you shortened the first word of your user name and, put Richard before it, it would be perfect for you.

Floflo, Oxford says...
9:11am Wed 27 Jan 10

Green123 wrote:
I certainly would include inactive people, yes, Floflo. Unless someone is severely disabled there's no excuse to be completely inactive. A neighbour of mine drives his kids the five minutes down the road to school, drives a few minutes to the shops and drives to pick up a takeaway from round the corner.

And then I hear him puffing and panting when he has waddle down his path to wheel his bin out onto the drive. I rest my case...
What level of activity would you say people have to prove that they undertake before they can access free health care?

LadyPenelope, West Oxon says...
12:31pm Wed 27 Jan 10

Floflo wrote:
Green123 wrote: I certainly would include inactive people, yes, Floflo. Unless someone is severely disabled there's no excuse to be completely inactive. A neighbour of mine drives his kids the five minutes down the road to school, drives a few minutes to the shops and drives to pick up a takeaway from round the corner. And then I hear him puffing and panting when he has waddle down his path to wheel his bin out onto the drive. I rest my case...
What level of activity would you say people have to prove that they undertake before they can access free health care?
30 mins walking on a daily basis should be a minimum requirement, as most people should easily be able to manage this.

"Inactive" classifies those whose only exercise is walking to the fridge to get another pie, or walking to the front door to greet the arrival of a takeaway pizza etc...

Comments are closed on this article.

Nick Maynard believes gastric surgery should be widely available Clare Burnett

Nick Maynard believes gastric surgery should be widely available

Clare Burnett




Stay with Prague Hotels | Visit Spain with Barcelona Hotels

Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »