News RSS Feed


'Council put my car in crusher'

7:00am Monday 14th May 2007

comment Comments (7)   Have your say »


A tax disc is all that was left after Oxford City Council mistook a man's vandalised car as an abandoned vehicle and took it away to be scrapped.

Martin Young, of Headington Hill, contacted police immediately after discovering his car was missing last Thursday and reported it stolen.

Mr Young then decided to contact the council to see whether it had been found dumped somewhere - and was stunned to be told that the City Works department had towed it away.

He said: "I spoke to someone in the department, who told me that the car had been taken to a private contractor who deals with abandoned vehicles.

"I was given the number for LC Hughes, in Bicester, and they told me that the car was there and all the fluids had been removed.

"Then, later on, they called me back and said, 'sorry, it's been scrapped'."

Mr Young, who is now left without any form of transport, is demanding compensation from the council for the loss of his vehicle.

He said: "I thought that I had left it somewhere it would be safe.

"I was just waiting until I had the time and money to fix it up.

"I know that the council has the right to take away abandoned vehicles, but they can't just go on to private land and remove them.

"I could claim on my insurance, but I don't see why I should.

"I plan on sticking to my guns on this one and I won't be happy until my car is replaced."

Phil Dunsdon, interim business manager at City Works, said: "We can confirm that the vehicle has been removed and it has subsequently been destroyed, due to the condition that the officer found it in.

"The owner can contact the council and discuss this further if he wishes."

Mr Young was featured in the Oxford Mail last month after the car, a blue Ford Escort estate, was vandalised and a 'To Let' sign was smashed through the windscreen.


Your Say Yourthisisoxfordshire

Lucy, says...
12:58am Mon 14 May 07

Martin, you have my sympathies as something similar happened to me a few years back.

Good luck with getting an sense (or compensation!) out of the council :(

J, oxford says...
9:45am Mon 14 May 07

So, that'll be someones entire year of council tax paying for a new car for this guy!

Contratulations to the council for another mistake and wasting yet more of our council tax!! no wonder we get so little for the extortionate amount of CT that we pay!

Mikey, Oxford says...
12:21pm Mon 14 May 07

I'm Sure that Mr young would be the first to complain if an un-roadworthy vehicle were Left in his street for a month.

The article is not entirely clear about where Mr Young had dumped his vehicle-If it's his own "Private Land" or if he had permission from the land owner then he has been very unlucky but if it were on a public highway then it's his own fault and the Council (and ultimatly the council tax payer) should NOT foot the bill.

The reason why Young should claim on his insurance is because he is more to blame than anyone else (including the vandal, the council and the company who crushed his car).

andy, says...
1:08pm Mon 14 May 07

Mikey...You do not understand, this car was taxed so was legally allowed on the highway. The council if they bothered could have checked this with the DLVA. Therefore they should pay the costs and staff suspended.

Mikey, Oxford says...
1:40pm Mon 14 May 07

Andy- From the Thames valley Police website i think that this is pretty similar to how the council will have judged Mr Youngs Vehicle.

"What is an abandoned Vehicle?

The Council must be satisfied that a vehicle is abandoned before it can be dealt with. Normally you can tell if a vehicle has been abandoned by looking for the following signs:

It may not have moved for a long time (weeks or months), It is not taxed,
It may have been vandalised (broken windows, flat tyres or other parts missing),
It may be neglected and in poor condition generally,
It may be burnt out or have had a crash."


How many of these criteria do you think Mr Young's vehicle matched?

michael, says...
2:50pm Mon 14 May 07

Why didn't he claim on his insurance when the unwitnessed criminal damage occurred - the car would have been repaired and this could have been avoided. Thats why we pay our insurance premiums - to cover these unfortunte incidents. The owner has to take some responsibility for leaving a car in this state. If the vehicle was on private land he will undoubtedly have a claim and grievance. If it was on the Highway (the definition of which is broad) then the council have every right to move it to prevent danger and harm to others. If the later is the case then Mr Young only has himself to blame.

ADI, Oxford says...
9:48am Tue 15 May 07

How the heck can he get his car repaired when above it says
"We can confirm that the vehicle has been removed and it has subsequently been destroyed"

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »