89 per cent of city's roads need attention

89 per cent of city's roads need attention 89 per cent of city's roads need attention

A WISH-LIST of roadworks projects in Oxford has grown to more than 1,400 because of a lack of funding, transport bosses have revealed.

Every year, the city council asks County Hall for money to repair roads across the city’s 232-mile network.

But because of what the city council claims are funding shortages, the list gets longer every year, with some projects dating as far back as 1994.

During 2011 to 2012, 18 schemes were completed.

A Freedom of Information request made by Britannia Rescue has shown that there are 1,439 road maintenance projects outstanding in the city, spanning 207 of the city’s 232 miles of roads – 89 per cent of the network.

The city’s most repaired road in the past five years is Turl Street, which has had 119 projects carried out on it during that time.

The figures mean the city has the fifth highest number of outstanding schemes, and the third biggest length of roads where works are due in the country.

Taxi driver Richard Barlow, 59, said: “It is surprising, but then again if they actually filled in potholes with something permanent rather than this stuff which washes away they would not have to repair them all the time.”

Related links

West Oxford resident and the Cyclox cycling campaign group chairman Richard Mann, 43, said he didn’t think the figures showed Oxford City Council was falling behind with its duties.

He said: “They sound like fairly arbitrary figures, and what I assume is it reflects as much as anything how good the council is at understanding what is expected of it.

“I think the council probably has a good record of what it needs to do, and it will probably do it as soon as it can get the money.

“Local authorities are struggling to do the long list of jobs they have in front of them, and the council is being realistic about what it needs to do.”

City council spokesman Louisa Dean explained that the figure was from a council “wish-list” of projects which it applied for funding for every year.

She said: “We submit a bid to the highway authority in December every year to request funding. The schemes are based on our assessment and allocated a priority.

“The bid, for example, for 2011-2012 was £8.2m and we subsequently received £1.5m, therefore, due to the lack of funding, schemes remain on the list from year to year.”

Ms Dean said the 119 projects in Turl Street included responses to safety defects such as pothole repairs, but she said that the road had since been completely resurfaced.

She added that numerous projects dated as far back as 1994, including plans for a footpath reconstruction in Osler Road.

Oxfordshire County Council spokesman Owen Morton said: “The city council receives a proportionate amount of money for road maintenance compared with other parts of Oxfordshire, and is responsible for deciding how and where that money is spent, as a result of a funding agreement the city council itself signed up to.”

Comments(3)

Mark L. says...
11:06am Fri 8 Mar 13

I would suggest that many of the counties roads are in a similar appalling state.

Dick Wolff says...
4:42pm Fri 8 Mar 13

Allocation of funding by proportion of road length doesn't make sense when volume and weight of traffic is a bigger factor in road wear. Many of Oxford's roads are poorly constructed in the first place and it is clear that they cannot take the pounding they get from the modern buses. It's interesting to note the big difference between Sunderland Avenue in North Oxford which has needed very little work for years and, say Banbury Road, which is often under repair. Sunderland Avenue gets a lot of container trucks - but no buses. It will be interesting to see how the rebuilt Iffley Road stan the test.

Also : too many of the pothole repairs are poorly sealed, meaning that the next period of icy weather breaks them up.

Reynaldo Throckmorton, Duke of Botley says...
5:29pm Fri 8 Mar 13

232 miles of roads is an outrageously excessive length; far too long for any city, no matter how large. Surely the answer is to reduce the number of roads, and shorten the ones that remain, until the cost of the "wish-list" matches the cash provided by County Hall?

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree