Fear Green Belt will be destroyed by deal (From thisisoxfordshire)
When It Happens Panel Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting 'OXFORD NEWS' to 80360 or email
Fear Green Belt will be destroyed by deal
6:00pm Friday 1st March 2013 in News
By Reg Little, Oxford Times Chief Reporter. Call me on 01865 425434
Michael Tyce of the Oxfordshire CPRE
OXFORDSHIRE could pay a heavy price to secure City Deal millions from Government, with the widespread destruction of the Green Belt.
The claim comes from a leading conservation group, which fears key planning issues, such as the expansion of Oxford, could soon be handed over to an unelected quango.
And it warns that the newly announced City Deal with Government – said to hold out the promise of millions to boost economic growth – will lead to the creation of a “Greater Oxford” by the backdoor.
The claims have been refuted by a senior city council executive, who branded them “speculation written as fact”.
The City Deals bid was jointly submitted by all six Oxfordshire councils, the two universities, major science faculties and Oxfordshire Local Enterprise Partnership.
Announcing last week that Oxford and Oxfordshire was one of 20 regions in the second wave of deals, deputy prime minister Nick Clegg said the decision would mean Whitehall “letting go of power and money”.
But the Oxfordshire Campaign To Protect Rural England fears some local councils had not understood what they signed up to.
And it argues that rather than going to local representatives, planning powers will be handed to an unelected board, dominated by organisations hellbent on expanding Oxford on to the Green Belt, including land south of Grenoble Road.
CPRE committee member Michael Tyce said: “It will involve creating a Greater Oxford city region spreading out as far as Bicester to speed up economic growth.
“With City Deals the Government provides funding and enhanced decision making powers in return for assurances that development will be ratcheted up. It is hard to see this as anything other than a major outward expansion of the city, as the city council has long been planning.”
Mr Tyce claims this would be made possible with the creation of a new Quango Board of the City, with powers to take binding decisions.
While there would be representatives of district councils, he said it would include Oxford University, a major landowner which, with Oxford colleges, could make millions from development, and the city council would act as administrator for the board.
Mr Tyce said: “Although all the local authorities would be represented on the board, they would be outnumbered by the city and other members. This seems like passing control of a large swathe of Oxfordshire and its residents from the control of elected councils to an unelected quango.”
But David Edwards, city council executive director for regeneration and housing, said: “This is not Green Belt busting by the back door. There is a lot of speculation on the part of the CPRE written as fact. There is no hidden agenda.
“Any proposal for new development would have to go through the planning process properly, as it does now.”
He said many questions remained to be answered and the council would be meeting with Government to explore how to boost economic growth.
Oxfordshire County Council leader Ian Hudspeth said: “Since all Oxfordshire councils are working together on the City Deal, it’s certainly wide of the mark to suggest this amounts to an unelected body.”
Comments(4)
xjohnx
says...
8:35am Sat 2 Mar 13
Might I suggest than less micro management by planners would help bring our nation into the 21st century.
Dont drag it back to the past all the time.
Lord Palmerstone
says...
10:04am Sun 3 Mar 13
xjohnx wrote:Good point. If a Martian were told of the planning laws then asked to identify builldings which conform he would inevitably point to those built pre-1947. Taking the vicinity of Speedwell Street our Martian would identify it as being built at a time of pure anarchy, and certainly never subject to the Town and Country Planning Act.
Strangely enough, the beautiful buildings in Oxford and all our cities, were built before planning rules were even thought of.
Might I suggest than less micro management by planners would help bring our nation into the 21st century.
Dont drag it back to the past all the time.
But having been exposed so long to ugliness can our cities ever recover?
Lord Palmerstone
says...
10:10am Sun 3 Mar 13
Kevin Webster Iffley Fields wrote:I think that green open space benefits even your huddled masses Kevin, not just the fat men in dress suits with top hats like me who trample upon said masses and breakfast on their babies. A little less socialist bigotry wouldn't come amiss , would it?
Andrew:Oxford wrote:Maybe if groups like the CPRE had to have an equal leadership of people in rented houses, people living at home who can't afford to buy or rent, as well as the current leadership of well off people looking to secure their own property value, then we may get a rational response to plans that involve giving hope to the first two of ever having a home of their own. Until that happens then The CPRE will always be seen as an upper class nimby and nowhere near either campaign group looking to protect their mansions.
What's the difference between a Quango engaging with planning decisions and the ever vocal CPRE and their obsession with the land south of Grenoble Road.
The best thing for land South of Grenoble Road is a Golf Course and to build on Southfield Golf Course - that way the houses stay inside the ring road...
Andrew:Oxford says...
8:36pm Fri 1 Mar 13
The best thing for land South of Grenoble Road is a Golf Course and to build on Southfield Golf Course - that way the houses stay inside the ring road...