Policy changed on new postgrad digs

Sietske Boeles Sietske Boeles

A POLICY designed to stop student accommodation being built in residential areas would not apply to housing for postgraduates, it has emerged.

Residents strongly supported an Oxford City Council policy designed to direct student accommodation to main thoroughways and the city centre.

The policy was seen as a means of reducing disturbance from students and to ensure developers focused on building family homes, rather than more profitable student blocks.

But it is claimed the Sites and Housing Plan – which sets out where homes should be built in Oxford over the next 13 years and was approved last month by a planning inspector – has seen the policy watered down.

East Oxford Residents’ Associations Forum, made up of 20 residents’ groups, say a late compromise has resulted in a distinction being made between undergraduate and postgraduate accommodation, to allow new graduate accommodation to go on being built in residential areas.

Forum spokesman Dr Sietske Boeles fears the change will hit the number of homes built for families, meaning Oxford may not meet its housing targets.

She said: “There is now huge concern. It seems that graduate accommodation will not be subject to the policy. It goes against the core principle that the expansion of student accommodation in Oxford should not be at the expense of general housing provision.

Related links

“It seems there will now be two types of student accommodation. It is a mess.”

Colin Cook, city council board member for development, said: “I sympathize with residents who are concerned on this front. But the inspector has been persuaded by the university’s argument that graduates are a different kettle of fish.

“But I think we will still be able to meet our housing target, although demand for housing will always vastly outstrip supply.”

Mr Cook assured residents that postgraduates were far less likely to inflict late night disturbance.

Oxford University spokesman, Matt Pickles, said: “Graduate students tend to be older and live and work like full-time professionals, sometimes with families.”

Ed Chipperfield, of James Street, said: “Postgraduate students are usually a quiet bunch in my personal experience, and I was one once.

“I can see why that compromise has been reached but I would be concerned about the long- term implications of it because who is to say that housing built for postgraduate students won’t be turned into housing for undergraduates in the future if it can’t be filled.”

Of the students currently at Oxford University, 11,752 are undergraduates and 9,621 postgraduates.

The council clashed with Oxford University over a proposal to make it and the colleges contribute to social housing as the price of being allowed to build new student accommodation, with a charge of £140 per square metre.

After seeking legal advice the colleges said the policy was unlawful and amounted to “a specialist local tax”.

It is understood the compromise arrangements mean the universities and colleges will be able to seek exemption on grounds such as “viability and meeting student accommodation targets”.

The Sites and Housing Plan will go to the city Council’s full council for formal adoption on February 18.

Comments(4)

Andrew:Oxford says...
8:53am Fri 18 Jan 13

If the rules were too rigidly defined and implemented, many working professionals - such as senior Drs & medical consultants, who are required to undertake core study and development to maintain their professional status, could be forced out of their homes...

As many post-graduates work as part of their ongoing education and development the effective rule of:-

"No accommodation without taxation!"

Seems to be fair.

Grunden Skip says...
3:04pm Fri 18 Jan 13

Another case of the University making the council look like the fools they probably are. As more and more student accommodation goes up within the city, local families are either forced out of their locality, or have to rent privately off of slum landlords, with exorbitant rents paid for by you and me in the form of housing benefit. The City was here first, so technically The University is a guest of ours, but unfortunately it looks like the guests have taken over the hotel.

Myron Blatz says...
12:16am Sat 19 Jan 13

Weren't the Romans here first? Money and breeding speaks, Grunden - as the odd Lottery winner, top footballers and pop stars know only too-well. And so it is with Oxford University, which probably originated 'Town and Gown' and has seemed to breed people who think themselves smart and clever ever-since, as proven by former students like Oxford East's very own Andrew Smith MP, and City Council's Bored Member, Cllr Colin Cook.

Toby Porter says...
4:05pm Mon 21 Jan 13

Planning decisions will work better for Oxford's residents when we become more skillful at linking the voting records and role of Councillors on important planning decisions with re-election campaigns. Councillor Colin Cook, for example, needs to be held accountable by the residents of Jericho, who are almost to a person offended and appalled by the fact that the University was granted planning permission for the ugly flats blighting Port Meadow, with a consultation process that has proven shambolic to the point of suspicious. Residents of Jericho are quite rightly up in arms, but how many of them know the important role Cllr Cook has in the planning process that went so badly wrong. The ballot box is the ultimate accountability took

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree