Today's most viewed
Attack dog is put down
The two-year-old Alsatian that attacked a teenager in a park has been put down despite calls to save its life.
Amy and Victor Armstrong decided to have their pet George put to sleep after it attacked 14-year-old Dominic Sanders, of Elm Drive, Garsington, on July 26.
He suffered two bite wounds after the dog was let off its lead by Mr Armstrong during one of its daily walks.
George was taken to a vet on Saturday despite some urging his owners to spare the dog's life.
Mr Armstrong said: "After everything that has happened, I'm just tired of it all now and want to move on."
Last week, his wife apologised for the incident. She added: "We're shocked at what he has done to the boy - we cannot apologise enough.
"What happened was definitely out of character. We're having him put down, which I'm a little bit choked about, but it should be done, because it's the law."
Many readers posting comments on our website www.oxfordmail.co.uk had called for George to be saved.
4:33pm Monday 4th August 2008
Print 
Email this 
CommentPosted by: jenny, garsington on 4:53pm Mon 4 Aug 08
gutted
Posted by: Mr Ison, England on 4:54pm Mon 4 Aug 08
They were ritually killing a motorcycle the other day.
If you do not want the dog maybe someone else does?
They were ritually killing a motorcycle the other day.
If you do not want the dog maybe someone else does?
Posted by: Faith, Seattle, WA on 5:22pm Mon 4 Aug 08
This is a sad and preventable situation and the dogs life could have been saved it the owner used some common sense and leashed his dog in public.
This is a sad and preventable situation and the dogs life could have been saved it the owner used some common sense and leashed his dog in public.
Posted by: Tom on 5:28pm Mon 4 Aug 08
[quote][bold]Faith[/bold] wrote:
This is a sad and preventable situation and the dogs life could have been saved it the owner used some common sense and leashed his dog in public. [/quote] The dog that is your president has (by proxy) killed over 200,000 people in the world in the lie that is "the war on terror".
Why do you try putting a leash on him and spare us your comments from the west coast of the U.S.
Faith wrote:
This is a sad and preventable situation and the dogs life could have been saved it the owner used some common sense and leashed his dog in public.
The dog that is your president has (by proxy) killed over 200,000 people in the world in the lie that is "the war on terror".
Why do you try putting a leash on him and spare us your comments from the west coast of the U.S.
Posted by: John D., Oxford on 5:31pm Mon 4 Aug 08
The owners were careless and irresponsible. Then they compound their error by having the dog killed. They should be prosecuted criminally. I imagine the victim's family will be filing a civil lawsuit as well.
The owners were careless and irresponsible. Then they compound their error by having the dog killed. They should be prosecuted criminally. I imagine the victim's family will be filing a civil lawsuit as well.
Posted by: Tom on 5:38pm Mon 4 Aug 08
[quote][bold]John D.[/bold] wrote:
The owners were careless and irresponsible. Then they compound their error by having the dog killed. They should be prosecuted criminally. I imagine the victim's family will be filing a civil lawsuit as well.[/quote] You (like myself) do not know if they were careless or irresponsible,you were not there and do not know if the "victim" provoked the animal.
In what respect do you think they should be prosecuted?
As for....
"I imagine the victim's family will be filing a civil lawsuit as well."
Is the Pope a former Nazi?.....
John D. wrote:
The owners were careless and irresponsible. Then they compound their error by having the dog killed. They should be prosecuted criminally. I imagine the victim's family will be filing a civil lawsuit as well.
You (like myself) do not know if they were careless or irresponsible,you were not there and do not know if the "victim" provoked the animal.
In what respect do you think they should be prosecuted?
As for....
"I imagine the victim's family will be filing a civil lawsuit as well."
Is the Pope a former Nazi?.....
Posted by: Chris, Oxford on 5:46pm Mon 4 Aug 08
Tom, you sound like a raging nutter who probably shouldn't even be offering a home to a hamster let alone a German Shepherd !
Tom, you sound like a raging nutter who probably shouldn't even be offering a home to a hamster let alone a German Shepherd !
Posted by: Tom on 5:53pm Mon 4 Aug 08
[quote][bold]Chris[/bold] wrote:
Tom, you sound like a raging nutter who probably shouldn't even be offering a home to a hamster let alone a German Shepherd ! [/quote] That is the problem with spineless individuals like you Chris.
Anybody with a strong view is a nutter to you because they make you feel inadequate and helpless.
Am i right in saying that your attitude is "as long as my mortgage gets paid and i can go to Marks and Spencer?........"
And finally do not forget Hamsters need love too.
Chris wrote:
Tom, you sound like a raging nutter who probably shouldn't even be offering a home to a hamster let alone a German Shepherd !
That is the problem with spineless individuals like you Chris.
Anybody with a strong view is a nutter to you because they make you feel inadequate and helpless.
Am i right in saying that your attitude is "as long as my mortgage gets paid and i can go to Marks and Spencer?........"
And finally do not forget Hamsters need love too.
Posted by: Tracey, Oxford on 6:00pm Mon 4 Aug 08
I'm very upset about this. My dog attacked me when I was younger but we gave him another chance, he's never done it again. He's part of the family, can't imagine being without him.
If it was up to me I wouldn't let the couple have any more pets in case the same thing happened again and they reacted the same way. What I would love to know is why wasn't the dog on a lead to start with?? This never would happened if he had been.
I'm very upset about this. My dog attacked me when I was younger but we gave him another chance, he's never done it again. He's part of the family, can't imagine being without him.
If it was up to me I wouldn't let the couple have any more pets in case the same thing happened again and they reacted the same way. What I would love to know is why wasn't the dog on a lead to start with?? This never would happened if he had been.
Posted by: kmb, LV,NV,US on 6:03pm Mon 4 Aug 08
[quote]Tom, you sound like a raging nutter who probably shouldn't even be offering a home to a hamster let alone a German Shepherd ![/quote]
I agree with Chris, and Faith, I don't know if you are an American but not all of us Brits as a ignorant as that man.
Tom, you sound like a raging nutter who probably shouldn't even be offering a home to a hamster let alone a German Shepherd !
I agree with Chris, and Faith, I don't know if you are an American but not all of us Brits as a ignorant as that man.
Posted by: Realistic, Oxford on 6:17pm Mon 4 Aug 08
I am a little confused. A big powerful dog attacks a child. Dog is then put down (at owners request). I don't see the problem. Should the owners have waited until the attacks got more serious (loss of limbs, death of person/other dogs) until they have it put down?
Or maybe they should have given the dog away then someone else is responsible next time it attacks someone??
I am a little confused. A big powerful dog attacks a child. Dog is then put down (at owners request). I don't see the problem. Should the owners have waited until the attacks got more serious (loss of limbs, death of person/other dogs) until they have it put down?
Or maybe they should have given the dog away then someone else is responsible next time it attacks someone??
Posted by: Tom on 6:48pm Mon 4 Aug 08
[quote][bold]kmb[/bold] wrote:
[quote]Tom, you sound like a raging nutter who probably shouldn't even be offering a home to a hamster let alone a German Shepherd ![/quote] I agree with Chris, and Faith, I don't know if you are an American but not all of us Brits as a ignorant as that man.[/quote] Ah.....
A Brit Behind enemy lines would have to adopt that cowardly stance.
P.S i am not British....
kmb wrote:
Tom, you sound like a raging nutter who probably shouldn't even be offering a home to a hamster let alone a German Shepherd !
I agree with Chris, and Faith, I don't know if you are an American but not all of us Brits as a ignorant as that man.
Ah.....
A Brit Behind enemy lines would have to adopt that cowardly stance.
P.S i am not British....
Posted by: Tom on 6:56pm Mon 4 Aug 08
[quote][bold]Realistic[/bold] wrote:
I am a little confused. A big powerful dog attacks a child. Dog is then put down (at owners request). I don't see the problem. Should the owners have waited until the attacks got more serious (loss of limbs, death of person/other dogs) until they have it put down? Or maybe they should have given the dog away then someone else is responsible next time it attacks someone??[/quote] Yes you are confused.
"A big powerful dog attacks a child."
(1) the dog did minimal damage,it was confused,most likely due to the teenagers teasing it.A dog like that ,if vicious,would have taken his arm off.....
(2) He is not a child,in fact he looks like a recruit from "Britains next ASBO".
"Dog is then put down (at owners request)"
(1) maybe easier to kill the dog than try to deal with the situation?
Or maybe they should have given the dog away then someone else is responsible next time it attacks someone??
(1)There is noting to lead you to say that it would have attacked again.This is utter nonsense.
Realistic wrote:
I am a little confused. A big powerful dog attacks a child. Dog is then put down (at owners request). I don't see the problem. Should the owners have waited until the attacks got more serious (loss of limbs, death of person/other dogs) until they have it put down? Or maybe they should have given the dog away then someone else is responsible next time it attacks someone??
Yes you are confused.
"A big powerful dog attacks a child."
(1) the dog did minimal damage,it was confused,most likely due to the teenagers teasing it.A dog like that ,if vicious,would have taken his arm off.....
(2) He is not a child,in fact he looks like a recruit from "Britains next ASBO".
"Dog is then put down (at owners request)"
(1) maybe easier to kill the dog than try to deal with the situation?
Or maybe they should have given the dog away then someone else is responsible next time it attacks someone??
(1)There is noting to lead you to say that it would have attacked again.This is utter nonsense.
Posted by: Viva las Vegas on 7:03pm Mon 4 Aug 08
[quote][bold]kmb[/bold] wrote:
[quote]Tom, you sound like a raging nutter who probably shouldn't even be offering a home to a hamster let alone a German Shepherd ![/quote] I agree with Chris, and Faith, I don't know if you are an American but not all of us Brits as a ignorant as that man.[/quote] Clearly been pulling too hard at the one armed bandits too long......
kmb wrote:
Tom, you sound like a raging nutter who probably shouldn't even be offering a home to a hamster let alone a German Shepherd !
I agree with Chris, and Faith, I don't know if you are an American but not all of us Brits as a ignorant as that man.
Clearly been pulling too hard at the one armed bandits too long......
Posted by: Ed, Oxford on 8:23pm Mon 4 Aug 08
Very sad. I would have given him a home with my other 2 year old German Shepherd.
A dog like that would do a great deal more damage if attacked, so this lad's scratch was clearly a warning to "leave me and my owner alone or else".
RIP George
Very sad. I would have given him a home with my other 2 year old German Shepherd.
A dog like that would do a great deal more damage if attacked, so this lad's scratch was clearly a warning to "leave me and my owner alone or else".
RIP George
Posted by: Woof Woof, Bicester on 9:36pm Mon 4 Aug 08
Ed, Oxford..
You say you would have taken this dog in.. would your views still be the same, if this dog has killed the lad?????
Dogs should always be kept on a lead..
Ed, Oxford..
You say you would have taken this dog in.. would your views still be the same, if this dog has killed the lad?????
Dogs should always be kept on a lead..
Posted by: Delancey, Omaha, NE USA on 9:55pm Mon 4 Aug 08
Tom is Master of the Obvious. Bush started a war on a lie? Really?? My stars Tom, thank goodness you set us all straight on that one! And to think we were content to discuss a dead dog!
Tom is Master of the Obvious. Bush started a war on a lie? Really?? My stars Tom, thank goodness you set us all straight on that one! And to think we were content to discuss a dead dog!
Posted by: Mr Ison, England on 9:57pm Mon 4 Aug 08
How you gonna chase after a ball if you are tethered?
How you gonna chase after a ball if you are tethered?
Posted by: Ben, Banbury on 11:56pm Mon 4 Aug 08
I also find this a little hard to get my head around. We hear stories of dogs that attack people, but people are quite happy to let this dog have another chances because its the owners fault. In my opinion, the severity of an attack should not determine whether the dog should be put down or not. The simple fact is it lost control and attacked someone, and nobody can be completely sure that this will not happen again.
You only need to go on the BBC website to realise just how many people have been savaged by uncontrollable dogs. Instead of blaming the owners or teenagers, how about considering that this dog could have gone on to this to a small child in a more brutal way next time.
I like animals, but when you start placing their importance above the safety of toddlers and teenagers you have serious issues, or have obviously never experienced this happening to your own children.
I also find this a little hard to get my head around. We hear stories of dogs that attack people, but people are quite happy to let this dog have another chances because its the owners fault. In my opinion, the severity of an attack should not determine whether the dog should be put down or not. The simple fact is it lost control and attacked someone, and nobody can be completely sure that this will not happen again.
You only need to go on the BBC website to realise just how many people have been savaged by uncontrollable dogs. Instead of blaming the owners or teenagers, how about considering that this dog could have gone on to this to a small child in a more brutal way next time.
I like animals, but when you start placing their importance above the safety of toddlers and teenagers you have serious issues, or have obviously never experienced this happening to your own children.
Posted by: sienna on 11:11am Tue 5 Aug 08
[quote][bold]Ben[/bold] wrote:
I also find this a little hard to get my head around. We hear stories of dogs that attack people, but people are quite happy to let this dog have another chances because its the owners fault. In my opinion, the severity of an attack should not determine whether the dog should be put down or not. The simple fact is it lost control and attacked someone, and nobody can be completely sure that this will not happen again. You only need to go on the BBC website to realise just how many people have been savaged by uncontrollable dogs. Instead of blaming the owners or teenagers, how about considering that this dog could have gone on to this to a small child in a more brutal way next time. I like animals, but when you start placing their importance above the safety of toddlers and teenagers you have serious issues, or have obviously never experienced this happening to your own children.[/quote] At last-someone talking some sense.Good for you Ben
Ben wrote:
I also find this a little hard to get my head around. We hear stories of dogs that attack people, but people are quite happy to let this dog have another chances because its the owners fault. In my opinion, the severity of an attack should not determine whether the dog should be put down or not. The simple fact is it lost control and attacked someone, and nobody can be completely sure that this will not happen again. You only need to go on the BBC website to realise just how many people have been savaged by uncontrollable dogs. Instead of blaming the owners or teenagers, how about considering that this dog could have gone on to this to a small child in a more brutal way next time. I like animals, but when you start placing their importance above the safety of toddlers and teenagers you have serious issues, or have obviously never experienced this happening to your own children.
At last-someone talking some sense.Good for you Ben
Posted by: Tom on 11:27am Tue 5 Aug 08
[quote][bold]Delancey[/bold] wrote:
Tom is Master of the Obvious. Bush started a war on a lie? Really?? My stars Tom, thank goodness you set us all straight on that one! And to think we were content to discuss a dead dog![/quote] History has shown us time and time again that the citizens of that country are happy to turn a blind eye to "foreign suffering", as long as it ensures their standard of livivng continues.
Just thought i would state that obvious point too Delancey.
Delancey wrote:
Tom is Master of the Obvious. Bush started a war on a lie? Really?? My stars Tom, thank goodness you set us all straight on that one! And to think we were content to discuss a dead dog!
History has shown us time and time again that the citizens of that country are happy to turn a blind eye to "foreign suffering", as long as it ensures their standard of livivng continues.
Just thought i would state that obvious point too Delancey.
Posted by: Tom on 11:29am Tue 5 Aug 08
[quote][bold]sienna[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Ben[/bold] wrote: I also find this a little hard to get my head around. We hear stories of dogs that attack people, but people are quite happy to let this dog have another chances because its the owners fault. In my opinion, the severity of an attack should not determine whether the dog should be put down or not. The simple fact is it lost control and attacked someone, and nobody can be completely sure that this will not happen again. You only need to go on the BBC website to realise just how many people have been savaged by uncontrollable dogs. Instead of blaming the owners or teenagers, how about considering that this dog could have gone on to this to a small child in a more brutal way next time. I like animals, but when you start placing their importance above the safety of toddlers and teenagers you have serious issues, or have obviously never experienced this happening to your own children.[/quote] At last-someone talking some sense.Good for you Ben[/quote] "At last-someone talking some sense.Good for you Ben"
Translated.....
"Ben and Sienna are going to get a room."
Layer Cake was great.
sienna wrote:
Ben wrote: I also find this a little hard to get my head around. We hear stories of dogs that attack people, but people are quite happy to let this dog have another chances because its the owners fault. In my opinion, the severity of an attack should not determine whether the dog should be put down or not. The simple fact is it lost control and attacked someone, and nobody can be completely sure that this will not happen again. You only need to go on the BBC website to realise just how many people have been savaged by uncontrollable dogs. Instead of blaming the owners or teenagers, how about considering that this dog could have gone on to this to a small child in a more brutal way next time. I like animals, but when you start placing their importance above the safety of toddlers and teenagers you have serious issues, or have obviously never experienced this happening to your own children.
At last-someone talking some sense.Good for you Ben
"At last-someone talking some sense.Good for you Ben"
Translated.....
"Ben and Sienna are going to get a room."
Layer Cake was great.
Posted by: cottage2day, Cowley on 11:42am Tue 5 Aug 08
HA HA. GLAD THE MUTT HAS BEEN PUT DOWN.
HA HA. GLAD THE MUTT HAS BEEN PUT DOWN.
Posted by: Chris, Oxford on 12:21pm Tue 5 Aug 08
[quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Chris[/bold] wrote: Tom, you sound like a raging nutter who probably shouldn\'t even be offering a home to a hamster let alone a German Shepherd ! [/quote] That is the problem with spineless individuals like you Chris. Anybody with a strong view is a nutter to you because they make you feel inadequate and helpless. Am i right in saying that your attitude is \"as long as my mortgage gets paid and i can go to Marks and Spencer?........\" And finally do not forget Hamsters need love too. [/quote] I'll bear that in mind..
Am I right in guessing you're a deluded loner who lives in a grubby bedsit somewhere ?
Tom wrote:
Chris wrote: Tom, you sound like a raging nutter who probably shouldn\'t even be offering a home to a hamster let alone a German Shepherd !
That is the problem with spineless individuals like you Chris. Anybody with a strong view is a nutter to you because they make you feel inadequate and helpless. Am i right in saying that your attitude is \"as long as my mortgage gets paid and i can go to Marks and Spencer?........\" And finally do not forget Hamsters need love too.
I'll bear that in mind..
Am I right in guessing you're a deluded loner who lives in a grubby bedsit somewhere ?
Posted by: Tom on 2:02pm Tue 5 Aug 08
[quote][bold]Chris[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Chris[/bold] wrote: Tom, you sound like a raging nutter who probably shouldn\'t even be offering a home to a hamster let alone a German Shepherd ! [/quote] That is the problem with spineless individuals like you Chris. Anybody with a strong view is a nutter to you because they make you feel inadequate and helpless. Am i right in saying that your attitude is \"as long as my mortgage gets paid and i can go to Marks and Spencer?........\" And finally do not forget Hamsters need love too. [/quote] I'll bear that in mind.. Am I right in guessing you're a deluded loner who lives in a grubby bedsit somewhere ? [/quote] Chris i actually have a well paying job and do not live in a "grubby bedsit".
But if it makes your little ego feel better than you can think that.
Stereotyping is a sign of weak brainpower.
You do know that you can hold down a reasonable job without being a "yes man"?.
Chris wrote:
Tom wrote: Chris wrote: Tom, you sound like a raging nutter who probably shouldn\'t even be offering a home to a hamster let alone a German Shepherd !
That is the problem with spineless individuals like you Chris. Anybody with a strong view is a nutter to you because they make you feel inadequate and helpless. Am i right in saying that your attitude is \"as long as my mortgage gets paid and i can go to Marks and Spencer?........\" And finally do not forget Hamsters need love too.
I'll bear that in mind.. Am I right in guessing you're a deluded loner who lives in a grubby bedsit somewhere ?
Chris i actually have a well paying job and do not live in a "grubby bedsit".
But if it makes your little ego feel better than you can think that.
Stereotyping is a sign of weak brainpower.
You do know that you can hold down a reasonable job without being a "yes man"?.
Posted by: Tom on 2:04pm Tue 5 Aug 08
[quote][bold]cottage2day[/bold] wrote:
HA HA. GLAD THE MUTT HAS BEEN PUT DOWN.[/quote] That statement reflects you real lack of brainpower......
But i guess in Cowley that is no surprise...
cottage2day wrote:
HA HA. GLAD THE MUTT HAS BEEN PUT DOWN.
That statement reflects you real lack of brainpower......
But i guess in Cowley that is no surprise...
Posted by: Tom on 2:09pm Tue 5 Aug 08
Cowley is the Bronx of Oxford
Cowley is the Bronx of Oxford
Posted by: cottage2day, Cowley on 2:59pm Tue 5 Aug 08
Certainly is. Muther f*ckin G Dogg.
Certainly is. Muther f*ckin G Dogg.
Posted by: Ben on 4:11pm Tue 5 Aug 08
Tom-you're full of c***
Posted by: Tom on 4:18pm Tue 5 Aug 08
[quote][bold]cottage2day[/bold] wrote:
Certainly is. Muther f*ckin G Dogg.[/quote] While there recently they seem to be knocking down a lot of the Bronx to rebuild it all.
Cowley should in my opinion face the same fate.With the residents still in their houses????.
No great loss really.
The dumping ground of Oxford.
cottage2day wrote:
Certainly is. Muther f*ckin G Dogg.
While there recently they seem to be knocking down a lot of the Bronx to rebuild it all.
Cowley should in my opinion face the same fate.With the residents still in their houses????.
No great loss really.
The dumping ground of Oxford.
Posted by: Tom on 4:19pm Tue 5 Aug 08
[quote][bold]Ben[/bold] wrote:
Tom-you're full of c***[/quote] How was Sienna?
Ben wrote:
Tom-you're full of c***
How was Sienna?
Posted by: cottage2day, Cowley on 4:27pm Tue 5 Aug 08
[quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]cottage2day[/bold] wrote: Certainly is. Muther f*ckin G Dogg.[/quote] While there recently they seem to be knocking down a lot of the Bronx to rebuild it all. Cowley should in my opinion face the same fate.With the residents still in their houses????. No great loss really. The dumping ground of Oxford.[/quote] Cowley is better than the following: Barton, Rose Hill, BBL, Littlemore, Jericho, Berinsfield. Cos there are TRUE MUTHER F*CKING G'S THERE.
Tom wrote:
cottage2day wrote: Certainly is. Muther f*ckin G Dogg.
While there recently they seem to be knocking down a lot of the Bronx to rebuild it all. Cowley should in my opinion face the same fate.With the residents still in their houses????. No great loss really. The dumping ground of Oxford.
Cowley is better than the following: Barton, Rose Hill, BBL, Littlemore, Jericho, Berinsfield. Cos there are TRUE MUTHER F*CKING G'S THERE.
Posted by: ben on 4:39pm Tue 5 Aug 08
[quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Ben[/bold] wrote: Tom-you're full of c***[/quote] How was Sienna?[/quote] Not quite sure what you're talking about Tom-I don't think you do either.I obviously don't have enough 'brain power'
Tom wrote:
Ben wrote: Tom-you're full of c***
How was Sienna?
Not quite sure what you're talking about Tom-I don't think you do either.I obviously don't have enough 'brain power'
Posted by: Tom on 4:45pm Tue 5 Aug 08
[quote][bold]cottage2day[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]cottage2day[/bold] wrote: Certainly is. Muther f*ckin G Dogg.[/quote] While there recently they seem to be knocking down a lot of the Bronx to rebuild it all. Cowley should in my opinion face the same fate.With the residents still in their houses????. No great loss really. The dumping ground of Oxford.[/quote] Cowley is better than the following: Barton, Rose Hill, BBL, Littlemore, Jericho, Berinsfield. Cos there are TRUE MUTHER F*CKING G'S THERE.[/quote] Eastside....Westside
......
Why do nothside and southside never get mentioned ?????.
A sectret that 2pac will have taken to the grave no doubt.
Is a "G" a chavite?
Really does anybody know?.
cottage2day wrote:
Tom wrote: cottage2day wrote: Certainly is. Muther f*ckin G Dogg.
While there recently they seem to be knocking down a lot of the Bronx to rebuild it all. Cowley should in my opinion face the same fate.With the residents still in their houses????. No great loss really. The dumping ground of Oxford.
Cowley is better than the following: Barton, Rose Hill, BBL, Littlemore, Jericho, Berinsfield. Cos there are TRUE MUTHER F*CKING G'S THERE.
Eastside....Westside
......
Why do nothside and southside never get mentioned ?????.
A sectret that 2pac will have taken to the grave no doubt.
Is a "G" a chavite?
Really does anybody know?.
Posted by: Tom on 4:47pm Tue 5 Aug 08
[quote][bold]ben[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Ben[/bold] wrote: Tom-you're full of c***[/quote] How was Sienna?[/quote] Not quite sure what you're talking about Tom-I don't think you do either.I obviously don't have enough 'brain power'[/quote] I love you Ben,you make me want to leave my girlfriend.
ben wrote:
Tom wrote: Ben wrote: Tom-you're full of c***
How was Sienna?
Not quite sure what you're talking about Tom-I don't think you do either.I obviously don't have enough 'brain power'
I love you Ben,you make me want to leave my girlfriend.
Posted by: ben on 4:53pm Tue 5 Aug 08
[quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]ben[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Ben[/bold] wrote: Tom-you're full of c***[/quote] How was Sienna?[/quote] Not quite sure what you're talking about Tom-I don't think you do either.I obviously don't have enough 'brain power'[/quote] I love you Ben,you make me want to leave my girlfriend.[/quote] Do you
Tom wrote:
ben wrote: Tom wrote: Ben wrote: Tom-you're full of c***
How was Sienna?
Not quite sure what you're talking about Tom-I don't think you do either.I obviously don't have enough 'brain power'
I love you Ben,you make me want to leave my girlfriend.
Do you
Posted by: Tom on 4:54pm Tue 5 Aug 08
[quote][bold]ben[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]ben[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Ben[/bold] wrote: Tom-you're full of c***[/quote] How was Sienna?[/quote] Not quite sure what you're talking about Tom-I don't think you do either.I obviously don't have enough 'brain power'[/quote] I love you Ben,you make me want to leave my girlfriend.[/quote] Do you[/quote] Actually i think i will try and marry Sienna,she sounds hot.
ben wrote:
Tom wrote: ben wrote: Tom wrote: Ben wrote: Tom-you're full of c***
How was Sienna?
Not quite sure what you're talking about Tom-I don't think you do either.I obviously don't have enough 'brain power'
I love you Ben,you make me want to leave my girlfriend.
Do you
Actually i think i will try and marry Sienna,she sounds hot.
Posted by: cottage2day, Cowley on 5:10pm Tue 5 Aug 08
[quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]ben[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]ben[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Ben[/bold] wrote: Tom-you're full of c***[/quote] How was Sienna?[/quote] Not quite sure what you're talking about Tom-I don't think you do either.I obviously don't have enough 'brain power'[/quote] I love you Ben,you make me want to leave my girlfriend.[/quote] Do you[/quote] Actually i think i will try and marry Sienna,she sounds hot.[/quote] not as hot as your sister.... actually or your mum come to think about it. That one is debatable though.
Tom wrote:
ben wrote: Tom wrote: ben wrote: Tom wrote: Ben wrote: Tom-you're full of c***
How was Sienna?
Not quite sure what you're talking about Tom-I don't think you do either.I obviously don't have enough 'brain power'
I love you Ben,you make me want to leave my girlfriend.
Do you
Actually i think i will try and marry Sienna,she sounds hot.
not as hot as your sister.... actually or your mum come to think about it. That one is debatable though.
Posted by: Tom on 5:25pm Tue 5 Aug 08
[quote][bold]cottage2day[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]ben[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]ben[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Ben[/bold] wrote: Tom-you\'re full of c***[/quote] How was Sienna?[/quote] Not quite sure what you\'re talking about Tom-I don\'t think you do either.I obviously don\'t have enough \'brain power\'[/quote] I love you Ben,you make me want to leave my girlfriend.[/quote] Do you[/quote] Actually i think i will try and marry Sienna,she sounds hot.[/quote] not as hot as your sister.... actually or your mum come to think about it. That one is debatable though.[/quote] It takes a true man to make it personal.
I do not have any sisters and my mother is dead.
cottage2day wrote:
Tom wrote: ben wrote: Tom wrote: ben wrote: Tom wrote: Ben wrote: Tom-you\'re full of c***
How was Sienna?
Not quite sure what you\'re talking about Tom-I don\'t think you do either.I obviously don\'t have enough \'brain power\'
I love you Ben,you make me want to leave my girlfriend.
Do you
Actually i think i will try and marry Sienna,she sounds hot.
not as hot as your sister.... actually or your mum come to think about it. That one is debatable though.
It takes a true man to make it personal.
I do not have any sisters and my mother is dead.
Posted by: Realistic, Oxford on 5:48pm Tue 5 Aug 08
[quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Realistic[/bold] wrote:
I am a little confused. A big powerful dog attacks a child. Dog is then put down (at owners request). I don't see the problem. Should the owners have waited until the attacks got more serious (loss of limbs, death of person/other dogs) until they have it put down? Or maybe they should have given the dog away then someone else is responsible next time it attacks someone??[/quote] Yes you are confused.
"A big powerful dog attacks a child."
(1) the dog did minimal damage,it was confused,most likely due to the teenagers teasing it.A dog like that ,if vicious,would have taken his arm off.....
(2) He is not a child,in fact he looks like a recruit from "Britains next ASBO".
"Dog is then put down (at owners request)"
(1) maybe easier to kill the dog than try to deal with the situation?
Or maybe they should have given the dog away then someone else is responsible next time it attacks someone??
(1)There is noting to lead you to say that it would have attacked again.This is utter nonsense.
[/quote] Tom
The IS big and it IS powerful. That is fact.
The boy was 14. He is a child. That is fact.
You dont know if the child was teasing it. That is guessing.
There is nothing to say it WOULDN'T attack again. Again you are guessing.
The dog has a track record of attacking a child. That is fact. It poses a hightened risk having attacked already.
I don't think it is me who is talking nonsense. Just saying it how it is.
You are clearly an animal lover, which is admirable, but you need to concentrate on reality.
Tom wrote:
Realistic wrote:
I am a little confused. A big powerful dog attacks a child. Dog is then put down (at owners request). I don't see the problem. Should the owners have waited until the attacks got more serious (loss of limbs, death of person/other dogs) until they have it put down? Or maybe they should have given the dog away then someone else is responsible next time it attacks someone??
Yes you are confused.
"A big powerful dog attacks a child."
(1) the dog did minimal damage,it was confused,most likely due to the teenagers teasing it.A dog like that ,if vicious,would have taken his arm off.....
(2) He is not a child,in fact he looks like a recruit from "Britains next ASBO".
"Dog is then put down (at owners request)"
(1) maybe easier to kill the dog than try to deal with the situation?
Or maybe they should have given the dog away then someone else is responsible next time it attacks someone??
(1)There is noting to lead you to say that it would have attacked again.This is utter nonsense.
Tom
The IS big and it IS powerful. That is fact.
The boy was 14. He is a child. That is fact.
You dont know if the child was teasing it. That is guessing.
There is nothing to say it WOULDN'T attack again. Again you are guessing.
The dog has a track record of attacking a child. That is fact. It poses a hightened risk having attacked already.
I don't think it is me who is talking nonsense. Just saying it how it is.
You are clearly an animal lover, which is admirable, but you need to concentrate on reality.
Posted by: moo, oxford on 11:18pm Tue 5 Aug 08
that dog could have and should have been saved!!
i believe he was provoked by that boy, and now the dog has been destroyed! im quite gutted, especially after people offered to take him. there wasnt a police order to have him put down, if it was my dog i would have stood my ground against that stupid mother that thinks the sun shines out of her kids backside!!
RIP little george xx
that dog could have and should have been saved!!
i believe he was provoked by that boy, and now the dog has been destroyed! im quite gutted, especially after people offered to take him. there wasnt a police order to have him put down, if it was my dog i would have stood my ground against that stupid mother that thinks the sun shines out of her kids backside!!
RIP little george xx
Posted by: moo, oxford on 11:20pm Tue 5 Aug 08
oh yeah, im from cowley, and yes it is a dump and cowley road is a ghetto!!
oh yeah, im from cowley, and yes it is a dump and cowley road is a ghetto!!
Posted by: hillary on 10:12am Wed 6 Aug 08
my son did not provoke that dog and i dont think the sun shines out of his arse he was in that field with his brother and friends listin 2 music on there phones and another thing i,m NOT a stupid mother that same dog actacked another lad on the 5th july that the police know about wot if it was 1 of your kids u would,nt of cared now whos the stupid 1
my son did not provoke that dog and i dont think the sun shines out of his arse he was in that field with his brother and friends listin 2 music on there phones and another thing i,m NOT a stupid mother that same dog actacked another lad on the 5th july that the police know about wot if it was 1 of your kids u would,nt of cared now whos the stupid 1
Posted by: Tom on 10:20am Wed 6 Aug 08
[quote][bold]hillary[/bold] wrote:
my son did not provoke that dog and i dont think the sun shines out of his arse he was in that field with his brother and friends listin 2 music on there phones and another thing i,m NOT a stupid mother that same dog actacked another lad on the 5th july that the police know about wot if it was 1 of your kids u would,nt of cared now whos the stupid 1 [/quote] Oh do shut up you badly educated dog killer.
I am sick of people like you being a cancer on society.
You caused George to die.
He had more to give this world than you and your whole "clan" will ever.
hillary wrote:
my son did not provoke that dog and i dont think the sun shines out of his arse he was in that field with his brother and friends listin 2 music on there phones and another thing i,m NOT a stupid mother that same dog actacked another lad on the 5th july that the police know about wot if it was 1 of your kids u would,nt of cared now whos the stupid 1
Oh do shut up you badly educated dog killer.
I am sick of people like you being a cancer on society.
You caused George to die.
He had more to give this world than you and your whole "clan" will ever.
Posted by: Realistic, oxford on 1:04pm Wed 6 Aug 08
[quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]hillary[/bold] wrote: my son did not provoke that dog and i dont think the sun shines out of his arse he was in that field with his brother and friends listin 2 music on there phones and another thing i,m NOT a stupid mother that same dog actacked another lad on the 5th july that the police know about wot if it was 1 of your kids u would,nt of cared now whos the stupid 1 [/quote] Oh do shut up you badly educated dog killer. I am sick of people like you being a cancer on society. You caused George to die. He had more to give this world than you and your whole "clan" will ever. [/quote] Oh dear Tom. Sadly, as I expected, you are not able to have a constructive adult debate on the matter. You haven't replied to my post regarding the facts of the matter and have resorted to insults.
I suggest you don't bother posting until you are mature enough to debate a subject, rather than ranting and insulting.
Tom wrote:
hillary wrote: my son did not provoke that dog and i dont think the sun shines out of his arse he was in that field with his brother and friends listin 2 music on there phones and another thing i,m NOT a stupid mother that same dog actacked another lad on the 5th july that the police know about wot if it was 1 of your kids u would,nt of cared now whos the stupid 1
Oh do shut up you badly educated dog killer. I am sick of people like you being a cancer on society. You caused George to die. He had more to give this world than you and your whole "clan" will ever.
Oh dear Tom. Sadly, as I expected, you are not able to have a constructive adult debate on the matter. You haven't replied to my post regarding the facts of the matter and have resorted to insults.
I suggest you don't bother posting until you are mature enough to debate a subject, rather than ranting and insulting.
Posted by: Tom on 1:32pm Wed 6 Aug 08
[quote][bold]Realistic[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]hillary[/bold] wrote: my son did not provoke that dog and i dont think the sun shines out of his arse he was in that field with his brother and friends listin 2 music on there phones and another thing i,m NOT a stupid mother that same dog actacked another lad on the 5th july that the police know about wot if it was 1 of your kids u would,nt of cared now whos the stupid 1 [/quote] Oh do shut up you badly educated dog killer. I am sick of people like you being a cancer on society. You caused George to die. He had more to give this world than you and your whole "clan" will ever. [/quote] Oh dear Tom. Sadly, as I expected, you are not able to have a constructive adult debate on the matter. You haven't replied to my post regarding the facts of the matter and have resorted to insults. I suggest you don't bother posting until you are mature enough to debate a subject, rather than ranting and insulting.[/quote] I am ignoring you because you bore me.
I do not rant and if i insult anybody it is because they are scum.
Who are you exactly?
Realistic wrote:
Tom wrote: hillary wrote: my son did not provoke that dog and i dont think the sun shines out of his arse he was in that field with his brother and friends listin 2 music on there phones and another thing i,m NOT a stupid mother that same dog actacked another lad on the 5th july that the police know about wot if it was 1 of your kids u would,nt of cared now whos the stupid 1
Oh do shut up you badly educated dog killer. I am sick of people like you being a cancer on society. You caused George to die. He had more to give this world than you and your whole "clan" will ever.
Oh dear Tom. Sadly, as I expected, you are not able to have a constructive adult debate on the matter. You haven't replied to my post regarding the facts of the matter and have resorted to insults. I suggest you don't bother posting until you are mature enough to debate a subject, rather than ranting and insulting.
I am ignoring you because you bore me.
I do not rant and if i insult anybody it is because they are scum.
Who are you exactly?
Posted by: Realistic, oxford on 4:53pm Wed 6 Aug 08
[quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Realistic[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]hillary[/bold] wrote: my son did not provoke that dog and i dont think the sun shines out of his arse he was in that field with his brother and friends listin 2 music on there phones and another thing i,m NOT a stupid mother that same dog actacked another lad on the 5th july that the police know about wot if it was 1 of your kids u would,nt of cared now whos the stupid 1 [/quote] Oh do shut up you badly educated dog killer. I am sick of people like you being a cancer on society. You caused George to die. He had more to give this world than you and your whole "clan" will ever. [/quote] Oh dear Tom. Sadly, as I expected, you are not able to have a constructive adult debate on the matter. You haven't replied to my post regarding the facts of the matter and have resorted to insults. I suggest you don't bother posting until you are mature enough to debate a subject, rather than ranting and insulting.[/quote] I am ignoring you because you bore me. I do not rant and if i insult anybody it is because they are scum. Who are you exactly? [/quote] Yeah, you must find it boring letting the facts get in the way of your rant and inability to hold up your argument.
Whatever
Tom wrote:
Realistic wrote: Tom wrote: hillary wrote: my son did not provoke that dog and i dont think the sun shines out of his arse he was in that field with his brother and friends listin 2 music on there phones and another thing i,m NOT a stupid mother that same dog actacked another lad on the 5th july that the police know about wot if it was 1 of your kids u would,nt of cared now whos the stupid 1
Oh do shut up you badly educated dog killer. I am sick of people like you being a cancer on society. You caused George to die. He had more to give this world than you and your whole "clan" will ever.
Oh dear Tom. Sadly, as I expected, you are not able to have a constructive adult debate on the matter. You haven't replied to my post regarding the facts of the matter and have resorted to insults. I suggest you don't bother posting until you are mature enough to debate a subject, rather than ranting and insulting.
I am ignoring you because you bore me. I do not rant and if i insult anybody it is because they are scum. Who are you exactly?
Yeah, you must find it boring letting the facts get in the way of your rant and inability to hold up your argument.
Whatever
Posted by: Tom on 6:18pm Wed 6 Aug 08
[quote][bold]Realistic[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Realistic[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]Tom[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]hillary[/bold] wrote: my son did not provoke that dog and i dont think the sun shines out of his arse he was in that field with his brother and friends listin 2 music on there phones and another thing i,m NOT a stupid mother that same dog actacked another lad on the 5th july that the police know about wot if it was 1 of your kids u would,nt of cared now whos the stupid 1 [/quote] Oh do shut up you badly educated dog killer. I am sick of people like you being a cancer on society. You caused George to die. He had more to give this world than you and your whole "clan" will ever. [/quote] Oh dear Tom. Sadly, as I expected, you are not able to have a constructive adult debate on the matter. You haven't replied to my post regarding the facts of the matter and have resorted to insults. I suggest you don't bother posting until you are mature enough to debate a subject, rather than ranting and insulting.[/quote] I am ignoring you because you bore me. I do not rant and if i insult anybody it is because they are scum. Who are you exactly? [/quote] Yeah, you must find it boring letting the facts get in the way of your rant and inability to hold up your argument. Whatever[/quote] Ok Sista..........
Realistic wrote:
Tom wrote: Realistic wrote: Tom wrote: hillary wrote: my son did not provoke that dog and i dont think the sun shines out of his arse he was in that field with his brother and friends listin 2 music on there phones and another thing i,m NOT a stupid mother that same dog actacked another lad on the 5th july that the police know about wot if it was 1 of your kids u would,nt of cared now whos the stupid 1
Oh do shut up you badly educated dog killer. I am sick of people like you being a cancer on society. You caused George to die. He had more to give this world than you and your whole "clan" will ever.
Oh dear Tom. Sadly, as I expected, you are not able to have a constructive adult debate on the matter. You haven't replied to my post regarding the facts of the matter and have resorted to insults. I suggest you don't bother posting until you are mature enough to debate a subject, rather than ranting and insulting.
I am ignoring you because you bore me. I do not rant and if i insult anybody it is because they are scum. Who are you exactly?
Yeah, you must find it boring letting the facts get in the way of your rant and inability to hold up your argument. Whatever
Ok Sista..........
Posted by: moo, oxford on 9:59pm Wed 6 Aug 08
[quote][bold]hillary[/bold] wrote:
my son did not provoke that dog and i dont think the sun shines out of his arse he was in that field with his brother and friends listin 2 music on there phones and another thing i,m NOT a stupid mother that same dog actacked another lad on the 5th july that the police know about wot if it was 1 of your kids u would,nt of cared now whos the stupid 1 [/quote] yeah well that kid down the road probably provoked him as well, then when your kid did the same, the poor dog probably thought sod this!!
learn how to type FULL words you silly moo, keep text speak for your mobile!!
hillary wrote:
my son did not provoke that dog and i dont think the sun shines out of his arse he was in that field with his brother and friends listin 2 music on there phones and another thing i,m NOT a stupid mother that same dog actacked another lad on the 5th july that the police know about wot if it was 1 of your kids u would,nt of cared now whos the stupid 1
yeah well that kid down the road probably provoked him as well, then when your kid did the same, the poor dog probably thought sod this!!
learn how to type FULL words you silly moo, keep text speak for your mobile!!
Posted by: hillary, oxford on 8:04pm Mon 18 Aug 08
i think all this bibchin should stop now the dog has not been put down it has gone 2 a dogs home
i think all this bibchin should stop now the dog has not been put down it has gone 2 a dogs home
What are these links for?
If you liked this article and would like to share it with others on the web who might be searching for good content we've made it easy for you to do it.
At the bottom of all articles, you'll see links to six sites. These sites - commonly called 'social bookmark' or 'social news' sites - have large communities of web users who share and rate interesting, useful and fun things on the web.
Clicking the links will automatically add the address of the story you are reading to one of these sites, letting you share it with others. Each site will ask you to register to share stories. Registration is free and once a member, you can store, recommend and search for stories that interest you.
More on Digg
More on del.icio.us
More on Furl
More on reddit
More on NowPublic/
More on Yahoo!
